Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Exams

Rate this question


sharon

Question

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know when you get a cardiac or mental health C&P done by a PA you are getting a person whose only qualification is that they can read the disability sheet given them by the VA. They ask questions right from the list and if they are in a hurry they just skip tests or other objective or subjective findings. This is a disgrace and goes right to the cheapness of the VA. I have had horrible C&P exams in the past. If not for IMO's I would still be at 30% with no hope. I have had 10 minute mental health C&P exams frequently in the past. All they want to know is "Are you working or do you hear things or see things other people don't see or hear?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thank you Sharon. Good post.

What, if any changes will this report bring? And when will the changes be put into practice?

The problem I see is nothing changes with the C&P process. Same errors are repeated throughout the country.

Making sure where to send the appointment & following up with the vet for a correct address, getting examinations set up for the right conditions & "ALL" the issues need to be accurate the first time around. Nearly a 20% error rate? Why is that tollerated?

Report No. 08-01392-144

This is taken from the above report.

Incomplete C&P exam requests often result in additional and unnecessary work for VA personnel and can be indicative of poor customer service to veterans. To improve service provided to veterans filing disability claims, it is important for VA to take steps to reduce the number of incomplete exam requests.

VHA had inconsistent practices related to the extent VA healthcare facilities (VA HCFs) contacted veterans by telephone to schedule their C&P exam appointments. The number of incomplete C&P exam requests could be reduced if VHA improved C&P exam scheduling procedures. For example, VHA guidance states that VA HCF personnel are to contact veterans to schedule their C&P exam appointments and mail an appointment notification letter to the veteran. However, personnel at various VA HCFs did not call veterans to schedule their appointments and only notified veterans of their C&P exam appointments by letter. This practice is not in compliance with VHA scheduling guidance and does not include veterans in the process of scheduling their C&P exam appointments. Personnel from 6 (29 percent) of the 21 VA HCFs included in our sample stated they did not always make telephone calls to schedule C&P exam appointments, and personnel from 4 (19 percent) of the VA HCFs stated they only sent notification letters and did not make telephone calls. Personnel from 11 (52 percent) of the VA HCFs stated they scheduled C&P exam appointments by telephone contact with the veteran. We could not verify these statements because the method used to schedule appointments was not documented. Without direct communications with veterans, VHA cannot ensure they are working effectively with veterans who need C&P exams before complete decisions can be made on their disability claims.

VHA’s practices related to rescheduling veterans’ C&P exam appointments also differed across VA HCFs. VHA guidance states that C&P exams can be rescheduled on a one-time basis when a veteran requests that the exams be postponed for a valid reason. However, several C&P exams were inappropriately canceled because VA HCF personnel

VA Office of Inspector General i Audit of VA Incomplete Compensation and Pension Medical Examinations

did not reschedule the exam appointments based on the veteran’s reasonable request for a different appointment time. Instead, the exam requests were canceled and returned incomplete to the requesting VA Regional Office (VARO).

VARO personnel request more than one C&P exam, if necessary, when a veteran’s application contains multiple claimed conditions. VHA’s practices related to handling C&P exam requests with multiple exam appointments were not consistent across VA HCFs. VHA guidance does not address how to handle a situation when a veteran fails to report for an initial C&P exam and has subsequent appointments scheduled under the same request. Personnel at various VA HCFs canceled subsequent exam appointments and the C&P exam request after veterans did not attend their initial appointments without first contacting the veteran.

The number of incomplete exam requests could also be further reduced if VARO personnel submitted complete and accurate C&P exam requests to VA HCFs. We identified cases where VARO personnel sent C&P exam requests to the incorrect VA HCF. In these instances, VARO personnel sent C&P exam requests to incorrect VA HCFs based on the veterans’ residence, sent the requests to VA HCFs based on incorrect veterans’ addresses, or sent the requests to VA HCFs where the veterans were employed, which is contrary to VA guidance. We also identified C&P exam requests where VARO personnel did not include sufficient information for the exams to be scheduled and conducted, or the exams requested did not correctly address the veterans’ claimed conditions. About 11 percent of the incomplete C&P exam requests we reviewed were canceled because the requests were incomplete or inaccurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use