Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can One Make Any Money After Getting Iu?

Rate this question


griffcher

Question

  • Answers 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
John,

I think you bring up a somewhat valid point. And I imagine some people outside the system would not think too highly of the idea. But most people outside the system don't understand the system anyway. They would have trouble discerning which vets were getting compensated for SC conditions and which vets were getting compensated for being unable to work.

So would you suggest that vets who were drawing a certain amount of compensation because of the SC conditions quit working so that people on the outside of the VA wouldn't look at them badly? What level of SC disability should a Vet be allowed to draw and still remain employed?

I know that it would irk me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schedular (non-mental) is different than IU in that you can still work. If I have lost an arm and a leg and i'm 100% schedular I can work all I want. The key word here is schedular.

IU is defined differently. IU is not a schedular rating, it's only for those that aren't 100% schedular that are considered unemployable.

Jerr

John,

I think you bring up a somewhat valid point. And I imagine some people outside the system would not think too highly of the idea. But most people outside the system don't understand the system anyway. They would have trouble discerning which vets were getting compensated for SC conditions and which vets were getting compensated for being unable to work.

So would you suggest that vets who were drawing a certain amount of compensation because of the SC conditions quit working so that people on the outside of the VA wouldn't look at them badly? What level of SC disability should a Vet be allowed to draw and still remain employed?

Edited by jerrbilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free, Wanted to clarify something you wrote on 12/27/07 @ 3:08a.m...."The peple that just gamble for fun(ie hobby) can only deduct their losses."

Not true...IRS Sections 165 (d) 165.10 (Thanks for posting the IRS site) and so listed there basically state: ...provides that losses from wagering transactions are allowed as deductions only to the extent of the gains from such transactions. I know this all too well.

I self "medicated" with gambling as a form of compensating with my problems...my win/loss statment arrived and I tried to claim all losses on Income Taxes, NOPE doesn't work that way, according to regs can only deduct losses that are equaled to the winnings and no more.

Like the first year, I won over 8k but lost over 15k I could only offset the 8k lost to = the 8k won. I am out the rest.(7k) Had I won 8k and lost 0% I would have been taxed on the 8k. The losses are yours. No claiming, no deductions, just stupid giveaways. Too bad it took me and my spouse over 6 yrs to figure this out...gambling is another powerful addiction.

Each yr got progressively worse on the losses too. Some people smoke, drink and I had no vices till I went to a casino, then gambling was my form of escapism from my pain/depression/problems/claims woes,etc...That compounded my problems trifold.

job...stopped going to VA...got d/c... then 5 yrs later job did not pan out and he has been trying to refile since then to get back the 100% scd he once was.

If I am incorrect reading this then it's my bag. But I will go back again and see if that is not posted as thought

Edited by halos2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true for gambling but for investments you can claim up to $3000 in losses annually. I know this first hand. Too bad my losses were way over $3000 last year. :angry:

jerr

Free, Wanted to clarify something you wrote on 12/27/07 @ 3:08a.m...."The peple that just gamble for fun(ie hobby) can only deduct their losses."

Not true...IRS Sections 165 (d) 165.10 (Thanks for posting the IRS site) and so listed there basically state: ...provides that losses from wagering transactions are allowed as deductions only to the extent of the gains from such transactions. I know this all too well.

I self "medicated" with gambling as a form of compensating with my problems...my win/loss statment arrived and I tried to claim all losses on Income Taxes, NOPE doesn't work that way, according to regs can only deduct losses that are equaled to the winnings and no more.

Like the first year, I won over 8k but lost over 15k I could only offset the 8k lost to = the 8k won. I am out the rest.(7k) Had I won 8k and lost 0% I would have been taxed on the 8k. The losses are yours. No claiming, no deductions, just stupid giveaways. Too bad it took me and my spouse over 6 yrs to figure this out...gambling is another powerful addiction.

Each yr got progressively worse on the losses too. Some people smoke, drink and I had no vices till I went to a casino, then gambling was my form of escapism from my pain/depression/problems/claims woes,etc...That compounded my problems trifold.

job...stopped going to VA...got d/c... then 5 yrs later job did not pan out and he has been trying to refile since then to get back the 100% scd he once was.

If I am incorrect reading this then it's my bag. But I will go back again and see if that is not posted as thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free, Wanted to clarify something you wrote on 12/27/07 @ 3:08a.m...."The peple that just gamble for fun(ie hobby) can only deduct their losses."

Not true...IRS Sections 165 (d) 165.10 (Thanks for posting the IRS site) and so listed there basically state: ...provides that losses from wagering transactions are allowed as deductions only to the extent of the gains from such transactions. I know this all too well.

I self "medicated" with gambling as a form of compensating with my problems...my win/loss statment arrived and I tried to claim all losses on Income Taxes, NOPE doesn't work that way, according to regs can only deduct losses that are equaled to the winnings and no more.

Like the first year, I won over 8k but lost over 15k I could only offset the 8k lost to = the 8k won. I am out the rest.(7k) Had I won 8k and lost 0% I would have been taxed on the 8k. The losses are yours. No claiming, no deductions, just stupid giveaways. Too bad it took me and my spouse over 6 yrs to figure this out...gambling is another powerful addiction.

Each yr got progressively worse on the losses too. Some people smoke, drink and I had no vices till I went to a casino, then gambling was my form of escapism from my pain/depression/problems/claims woes,etc...That compounded my problems trifold.

job...stopped going to VA...got d/c... then 5 yrs later job did not pan out and he has been trying to refile since then to get back the 100% scd he once was.

If I am incorrect reading this then it's my bag. But I will go back again and see if that is not posted as thought

Halos,

You bring up a very valid point. Actually what I said about people who gamble for a hobby being able to only deduct their losses is true. I just did not explain it fully. I was mostly comparing gambling as a hobby with gambling as a profession - and the only thing those who gamble for a hobby are allowed to deduct is their losses, whereas those who gamble for a profession are allowed to deduct other things as a business expenses. I am sorry if it appeared that I was indicating that gamblers can deduct all of their losses. That was not my intent. Of course, as you stated, they are only allowed to deduct losses to offset what they won. Any loss above their winnings is not deductible. However, professional gamblers can deduct ANY gambling related expense as a business expense.

My main intent was not to give an IRS lesson on gambling. My main intent was to indicate that is not always safe to assume that gambling income is always considered unearned income. The VA or SSA would sometimes be able to come in and say if you are capable of gambling that much you are capable of working. And if the facts of your case are such that the VA or SSA determined that you met the IRS standards for a professional gambler, they could say you already were working.

And as you state - yes, gambling can sometimes become a very powerful addiction.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true for gambling but for investments you can claim up to $3000 in losses annually. I know this first hand. Too bad my losses were way over $3000 last year. :angry:

jerr

Yep. Last year was NOT a good year for investments. :(

I invested in food - I figured it would hold it's value. :) (I didn't buy stocks in food companies. I bought food!)

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use