Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Phony War Heroes Break Law Go Unpunished

Rate this question


carlie

Question

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I talk to a buddy from Vietnam every once in a while. He lives in Idaho and I live in Florida. We experienced some of the same events. He remembers them entirely differently that I do. I have a pretty good memory and I know he is wrong. He is sincere in his beliefs, so I would never say he is wrong. This goes to show how even honest people can distort the facts after 40 years. Just about every vet tells a war story, but there is a difference between being in Vietnam and not being there. There is a difference between getting a Medal of Honor and not getting one. Some of these guys actually believe they were in Vietnam or Iraq or Afghanistan. I can't imagine why anyone would claim to be there if they were not, so if someone tells me they were there I usually believe them. I got taken in by a guy who told me he was in SF for three years in Vietnam. Someone I know vouched for him, and I took it as fact. I found out later it was lies. He landed in jail for theft and fraud, so that is when I began to check. I think most Vietnam vets were treated so badly they might lie and say they were not there. Like on a college campus in the 60's and early 70's who would want to declare "I was in Vietnam and proud of it". First off, the other students think you were an idiot or a psychopath if you discuss it. Your professors would think of you as a specimen to be studied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If a person tells a lie enough after awhile they believe the lie. Most people today could give a rats ass about what anyone did or did not do. I find that for me when anyone mentions my service I tell them that I was drafted and served in Germany. I have the utmost respect for combat Veterans but I take people at their word till they prove other wise. Even as naive as I am sometimes I can usually tell a bull shitter cause I have known quite a few combat veterans and as yet I have not met one of them that felt like telling war stories and how they earned their medals.

So the guy with the silver and bronze star and 5 purple hearts would have stood out. I am not much of a fan of Burkette and his stolen valor but when I see a story like this I see a need for what he has done.

As a Viet Nam Era Veteran I joined the VVA in Dallas when it had been torn apart cause the elected President had just been shown up as a liar. He claimed he was a Navy Seal but he served in the Coast Guard.They made us show a copy of our DD 214 to join which I think is a good way to put an end to a lot of this crap.

Pete

3/12th Air Cav 3rd Armor Division Germany

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I talk to a buddy from Vietnam every once in a while. He lives in Idaho and I live in Florida. We experienced some of the same events. He remembers them entirely differently that I do. I have a pretty good memory and I know he is wrong. He is sincere in his beliefs, so I would never say he is wrong. This goes to show how even honest people can distort the facts after 40 years. Just about every vet tells a war story, but there is a difference between being in Vietnam and not being there. There is a difference between getting a Medal of Honor and not getting one. Some of these guys actually believe they were in Vietnam or Iraq or Afghanistan. I can't imagine why anyone would claim to be there if they were not, so if someone tells me they were there I usually believe them. I got taken in by a guy who told me he was in SF for three years in Vietnam. Someone I know vouched for him, and I took it as fact. I found out later it was lies. He landed in jail for theft and fraud, so that is when I began to check. I think most Vietnam vets were treated so badly they might lie and say they were not there. Like on a college campus in the 60's and early 70's who would want to declare "I was in Vietnam and proud of it". First off, the other students think you were an idiot or a psychopath if you discuss it. Your professors would think of you as a specimen to be studied.

Yes John, so true . You are right on target with your post, especially about " how even honest people can distort the facts after 40 years", as well as your other comments here.. . Like you, I also have a very good memory. Although I personally try not to remember my war experience, it seems that other people have done that for me. Over the years, I have accumulated after actions reports, battalion logs, copies of sworn military eye witness reports, as well as other publications, etc... Not to forget the old worn out flash backs, that can pull me back into 67'-68' Nam in a nano second. You could say my life is an open book. I do feel and appreciate the anonymity I have here at Hadit. You meet some of the most interesting vets and other people here.

post-4811-1264803148_thumb.jpg

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Commander Bob - I agree with you about meeting and keeping folks here. I find myself looking forward to reading and replying to a number of folks here, and really enjoying them and others whether I want hear what they say or not. I find Hadit a definite enrichment to my life.

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libel??? for talking about something thats public news????

Hate to tell ya but that's NOT grounds for libel. Libel would be if we knew him and was spreading false rumors. The things we're talking about here aren't rumors, their FRONT PAGE NEWS.

Repeating what's already being discussed by the news media isn't libel.

I read a lot of your posts and all I read is you bashing the VA. Don't be a hypocrit.

jerr

I would ask that the moderators close this post at least until such time as this Veteran(s) guilt has been confiremed by a court of law. Until such time, there is some chance that this/other Veterans sue hadit for libel. It is against the law to "slander" someones name, especially if it is discovered to be false. Until conviction, it is merely "rumors" and I dont think hadit wants to spread rumors.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use