Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Reading Through The Decision, Etc

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

Okay. So my DH got his big white envelope. Here's the background of his disability: He was in an jeep accident back in the military, severely burned, especially his arms, shoulder, and head (both his ears were burned off and most of the back of his scalp - they did reconstructive surgery and did a decent job, but the scars are still very noticible. His shoulder joint was partially burned away, and he very narrowly missed having both hands amputated. He spent a year in the Burn Center at BAMC. He recovered (miraculously) and stayed in to eventually just get out a few years later with a regular honorable discharge in 1985.

His friend said go to the VA, and to the VA he went. He got rated at 50%: 10% + 10% for 2nd degree burn scars, and 30% for left shoulder condition. He was young and happy to have 50%, so he didn't question anything about it. He didn't even know he had access to VA healthcare, he just went on his way.

25 years later, he filed for an increase, only because a buddy asked him how long it had been since he'd been evaluated. "25 years!! Get ye to the VSO!!". That's what he did, but in addition to the scars he filed for loss of motion in both his hands.

So here we are with the decision today.

They ADDED 30% for 3rd degree burn scars on his head.

They ADDED 30% for 3rd degree burn scars back, neck and chest.

They Increased from 10% for 2nd degree burn scars to 30% 3rd degree burn scars on his left arm.

They Increased from 10% for 2nd degree burn scars to 20% 3rd degree burn scars on his right arm.

They said that his Left Shoulder Condition had not worsened, that it was DJD and is not changed, and remains at 30%.

They denied both of his claims for his hands (even though they admit in the narrative that both hands suffered 3rd degree burns). They state that there was no evidence in the record of any injury to the hands. (uhhhh....)

In addition, we saw that they did not receive or consider an IMO from a board certified doctor

and they did not receive or consider evidence that his hands had been un-usable for a period of time.

So here are my questions:

First of all, can he file something about the VA missing that his burns were 3rd degree back in 1985? He had no instructions that he could appeal. There's surely no way that his burn scars changed from 2nd degree to 3rd degree over the 25 years.... If they're 3rd degree now, they were that back then. Plus, how the heck did they miss the scars on his head??? If they had just appeared magically, they wouldn't be SC now, would they?

Second, how does he disagree with the examiner's findings on his shoulder? When the examiner (NP) told him to reach up with his left arm, he said it hurt. He said do it anyway. DH had tears rolling down his cheeks. It's even stated in the decision that he was in pain throughout the examination, but that he had little loss of ROM due to pain. They also state that he was guarded in his movements.

The same thing happened with his hands - the examiner made him squeeze a grippy thing and told him to squeeze as hard as he could, regardless of the pain. DH squeezed until there were tears in his eyes. Ergo, no loss of grip, no range of motion.

I feel like we're looking a gift horse in the mouth, but at the same time, it feels like he's been cheated.

Any thoughts or advice? Thanks! And if you think I'm being greedy, say that too, okay?

Edited by hedgey

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I am so glad your DH is still with you -

Now is the time, if you have not already done so, to dig in deep and ask all the questions you never asked before.

If you have not got the treatment records from "VA Central", you could try to get those old treatment records from the location he was actually treated at - the hospital. Sometimes this will get you more.

Were there providers outside of the VA that can verify the breadth of any of his injuries?

Are there any old letters (which he couldn't write...) photographs of his injuries, or any other documented data that would prove the hand or other injuries?

Start thinking sideways. I won my case with the help of two letters my late husband wrote home from RVN in 1968, which I did not have in my possession nor even know about for 40 years! (I changed my opinion about old girlfriends...)

AkWidow

Edited by akwidow

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, get this claim together and go for it. No one should be made to present a medical condition to the point of tears. My c&p tears were for mental health, not for physical symptoms. Can't imagine the depressive thoughts going through your dear husbands mind for all this.

Bless you.

Cg

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
Yes, get this claim together and go for it. No one should be made to present a medical condition to the point of tears. My c&p tears were for mental health, not for physical symptoms. Can't imagine the depressive thoughts going through your dear husbands mind for all this.

Bless you.

Cg

CG, I agree that he should be treated for some type of depression and a depression claim should be filed.

Hedgey, What is your Hubby service connected for?

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't mention TDIU. Have you applied for it? Your DH sounds like a good candidate for TDIU P&T, just my humble opinion.

You aren't being greedy. You're just trying to get the benefits your DH and you deserve, and there are a lot of folks rooting for you. FWIW I am one of those folks.

Best of luck, and don't be discouraged by denials or being shortchanged. Just appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Hedgey

I havent put those percentages in a benefit calculator to know what the combined rating is, but it sounds like it at least 90% combined. May I ask as to what is a "DH"?

It sounds like his injuries are definately in the severe category, and there is a "SMC" ratings for loss of use of a hand or a foot, which would add to the benefits. Also, I dont know if he is working or not, but if he is not, then you should ask for, and probably eventually get TDIU.

It is a "no brainer" that you need to file a Notice of Disagreement. ...if he is at 100% combined, then NOD based on that he deserves SMC and an Earlier effective date. I think that when he went to the VA to get treatment for 3rd degree burns from Service connected conditions, that would be an informal claim for increase, effective the date of the examination.

The potential Retro for that many years is enormous, probably in 6 figures, so proceed carefully and methodically so this Vet can get what he deserves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use