Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Travelboard Judge Decision

Rate this question


Steppenwolf

Question

Turned down again. DAV tells me that i have 120 days to ask for reconsideration. i don't see anything in the envelope that says that.

Too many points to rehash but key missing VAMC files are mentioned as found. I have not seen them in 40 years. Who do I ask for copies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Not sure may be at BVA in Washington. Ask VARO. What happened at your hearing?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure may be at BVA in Washington. Ask VARO. What happened at your hearing?

At my hearing? Judge remanded to BVA. BVA remanded to VARO in CT. CT sent it to FL Congressman in CT demanded it back from FL. FL would not send it back until they "looked at it" and it had to wait it's turn. Years later it went back to CT. CT sent it to NC NC awarded one of three. In award letter VARO mistakenly states the the ruling is yes on one and no on two. DAV argues with me that the two issues are closed and waiting for me to sign off on the one award. The DAV will not submit new evidence on all three issues. Senator gets involved. VARO write to the senator and admit mistake: all issues still open. DAV still will not speak with me or return phone calls. No other VSO will represent me because of " unwritten law not to steal another organizations work ". VARO notifies me that I did not submit new evidence in the proper time and ruled against me. VARO sends records back to BVA BVA sends to judge. Judge rules against me on two issues that have been in appeal since 1971. Before the judge ruled I sent several pieces of vital evidence to VARO NJ ( a matter of convenience ) and got the issues time stamped hoping to generate a new SSOC. That never happened. She ruled without new evidence. I have no idea if submitting this new evidence before the extended 60 day expiration date deems it old evidence which was my fear from the the moment that DAV refused to submit it for me. I have letters and emails from the DAV in CT and NC telling me to do nothing to expedite my NOD on the first award for mistake of % is pending a request for a hearing.

Hope you could follow that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with John to hell with the DAV hire a lawyer NOVA has some great ones but there are many others out there that KNOW VA law find one that deals in VA law do not hire just any lawyer get one that specializes in VA law there are quite a few of them

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree – I suggest that you make sure you have all SMRs and copies of all available medical evidence

and copy of your C file as the lawyer will need all that. The C file should be at the last VARO which handled your claim.Since there seems to be many ROs involved here-maybe it would be best to send an Iris to confirm where the C file is.

“Before the judge ruled I sent several pieces of vital evidence to VARO NJ ( a matter of convenience ) and got the issues time stamped hoping to generate a new SSOC “

I don't understand the matter of convenience -why send it to NJ?

Did they list it on the decision as considered?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sending it to NJ and not to where the case is being viewed, is not good. The BVA should have been the place to send it to support your claim.

I agree with everyone else you need a good lawyer and you could win this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use