Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Travelboard Judge Decision

Rate this question


Steppenwolf

Question

Turned down again. DAV tells me that i have 120 days to ask for reconsideration. i don't see anything in the envelope that says that.

Too many points to rehash but key missing VAMC files are mentioned as found. I have not seen them in 40 years. Who do I ask for copies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks Berta. Sorry it's taken so long to get back. i will read the IMO thread.

You asked: " Have you formally filed for TDIU? "

No. My POA has told me that i can not apply for TDIU because 50% does not allow me to file for it until one disability is 70% or two equal 60%. If you know otherwise please explain.

Yesterday i called the 1 800 number and was told that there is no record of a travel board judge decision. i have about three weeks to respond to that decision. Since my POA has bailed on me i'm left with figuring out what to say besides : "I disagree with the judges decision."

The CAVC does not accept new evidence-I assume this is why the claim was remanded for the VA to consider it.

"The judge didn't like the way he said it."

Yes the statement was too ambiguous. We have a specific IMO format here under the IMO topic.

I developed it myself by using the IMOs I had from a doctor who used to work for VA so he knew exactly what wording to use.

"seemed to" is not a medical opinion with any rationale that conforms to VA lingo that they can comprehend.It gives them too much leeway to deny.

If the doc had said "I have reviewed the veteran's SMRs and it is as likely as not his present back problems arise from his documented back injuries in his SMRs.The veteran has had chronic problems with his back since leaving service and "..... here he could expand on his medical rationale.

"Anxiety, mood, and BP disorder" Approved 50% Most service records mention work related problems. All independent letters and reports and VA service records mention Unemployable nature of the condition including a 3 month study at a university which states: "you have not been employed for most of the past 39 years since your discharge from the military" I filed a NOD for 70% based on the unemployable history. I have another IMO stating the same."

Have you formally filed for TDIU?

"Yes to the C&P and Yes i supplied more evidence until my POA would not submit the rest of the new evidence that i had/have."

If you are on remand this has opened the door for more evidence.

If they didnt list anything as Evidence in the decision, it means they ignored it and you can submit it again unless it is redundant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Your POA is stupid. If you are 50% and apply for TDIU it makes the VA consider a higher rating.

If you are not working you are not working and the VARO can always grat extra schedular.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right Pete!

Regardless of SC percentage-if any SC disability(ies) render a vet unemployable by medical evidence then they are eligible for TDIU-if they apply for it.

70%SC triggers the VA to consider TDIU and send the form.

But nothing prevents a vet from applying for TDIU even with no SC at all.

SOme reps are too lazy to help a vet fill out the TDIU form.Or they simply dont know that it is medical evidence that awards TDIU,

I mentioned personal examples of vets before here I know that this worked for.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I was 30% when I applied for IU. I got 70% later and IU still denied. Another IMO and I got my IU. My effective date went back to the date when I had 30% and filed for IU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your POA is stupid. If you are 50% and apply for TDIU it makes the VA consider a higher rating.

If you are not working you are not working and the VARO can always grat extra schedular.

My POA is that and then some Pete. They have in reality abandoned me in the middle of my appeal. Attempting to find a new POA has proven near impossible since i was told by the American Legion NSO that "there is an unwritten 'rule' that one service organization does not take on the appeal of a veteran mid-stream..." i asked why and was told: " we won't take credit for the work that another organization has

done ". Maybe that means the screw ups as well as the sucess. In any event, they don't even return my call.

i have an NOD hearing sometime in the future where i was going to argue the percentage. If there is another way of going for the TDIU that i should know about please let me know.

Thanks for your feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use