Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Presumptive Within One Year

Rate this question


iraqrecall

Question

Ok maybe I am just dumb but heres my question.

If a disability is claimed with in one year of discharge is it considered presumptive?

I have had some medical problems arise after discharge but prior to one year but have been denied because of no nexus in my active duty medical records.

Iraqrecall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

iraqrecall,

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/jul.../38cfr3.400.pdf

38 CFR

EFFECTIVE DATES

§ 3.400 General.

(ii) Presumptive service connection (§§3.307, 3.308, 3.309). Date entitlement arose, if claim is received within 1 year after separation from active duty; otherwise date of receipt of claim, or date entitlement arose, whichever is later.

Where the requirements for service connection are met during service, the effective date will be the day following separation from service if there was continuous active service following the period of service on which the presump- tion is based and a claim is received within 1 year after separation from active duty.

Also study 3.307, 3.308 and 3.309

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/jul.../38cfr3.307.pdf

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

iraqrecall,

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/jul.../38cfr3.400.pdf

38 CFR

EFFECTIVE DATES

§ 3.400 General.

(ii) Presumptive service connection (§§3.307, 3.308, 3.309). Date entitlement arose, if claim is received within 1 year after separation from active duty; otherwise date of receipt of claim, or date entitlement arose, whichever is later.

Where the requirements for service connection are met during service, the effective date will be the day following separation from service if there was continuous active service following the period of service on which the presump- tion is based and a claim is received within 1 year after separation from active duty.

Also study 3.307, 3.308 and 3.309

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/jul.../38cfr3.307.pdf

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Thanks! I think that says yes so will have to do a NOD>

Iraqrecall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I filed for a MH condition within one year of discharge. My effective date was the day after I was discharged. That is how it works, and that is why you want to make your claims within a year after discharge. You might not win your claim for five years but it goes back to day after discharge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are different types of service connection by presumption.

The list of chronic diseases,which are manifested to at least 10% disabling within one year after service, are found within 38 USC1101 (3) or 38 CFR 3.309(a)/

Multiple Sclerosis however has a seven year presumptive period and I believe TB residulas has a 3 year window-need to check that-

also AO is presmptive of course with in most cases (but not all) with no time limits for most AO presumptive disabilities.

Certain tropical disablities, POW disabilities from captivity,certain mustrard gas and Lewisite disabilities, some radiation disabilites and some Persian Gulf War disabilities can be awarded service connection due to legal presumption.

But any chronic disablity that is not on the chronic presumptive list above can also be service connected with strong medical evidence of the nexus to service by proving manifestation to at least 10% of the disability within one year after service.The SMRS would also possible reveal symptoms that were documented but not diagnosed during service.

Chronic is the key word on these types of chronic presumptives in 38 CFR 3.309.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I filed for a MH condition within one year of discharge. My effective date was the day after I was discharged. That is how it works, and that is why you want to make your claims within a year after discharge. You might not win your claim for five years but it goes back to day after discharge.

It will only go back to day following separation if it is continually prosecuted.

Example:

Date of Discharge: Jan 1, 1990.

Date claim is filed for condition X : March 1, 1990.

Rating Decision dated : May 1, 1990 - denies SC for condition X.

Claimant never files a NOD.

Rating Decision for condition X (denial) becomes final on May 1, 1991.

Veteran submits a request to reopen claim for condition X on Feb 1, 1992.

On March 1, 1992, Va responds : The Rating Decision dated May 1,1990 has become final.

You may re-open the claim for condition X, by submitting New and Material Evidence.

On March 10, 1992 the veteran submits New and Material Evidence that is dated Feb 1, 1992,

for condition X that is both probative and credible.

Rating Decision dated : Oct 1, 1993 states,

Service connection for condition X has been granted with an evaluation of 10 percent.

An effective date of Feb 1,1992 has been assigned as this is the date of your request to

re-open the claim for condition X.

This is the way I understand the regs (38 CFR 3.400) for General - Effective Dates.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use