Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Still Need Help And Input On My Claims

Rate this question


68mustang

Question

Please need your advice on this. I received the dreaded envelope a couple of weeks. I was denied the claims for PTSD and for pulmonary fibrosis. I noticed that in the evidence used to deny both claims several pieces of evidence are not listed. Such as some copies of reports from my pulmonary specialist and a CT-scan performed by an imaging clinic, which I faxed to the VA and have confirmation they were received. Both pulmonary reports note that I have mild asbestosis. The PTSD denial has information missing that I discussed with the mental health examiner. I have requested a copy of the mental health exam to look over what the examiner wrote or excluded. I did not have a pulmonary exam because the VA never sent me for one even after I requested one.

I am in the process of obtaining letters from my primary doctor and pulmonary specialist attributing my mild asbestosis to asbestos exposure in my military jobs.

Since the Houston office has not provided copies of the mental health exam, can I file a NOD or what do you all advise I do? Thanks.

68mustang

Edited by 68mustang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get a copy that is complete of your C&P and you can also go to your Mental Clinic and request that they release copies so that you can use them in your claim.

You might consider asking a Patient Rep to help you get the records that you need. Right now all you have is a denial and nothing to dispute cause you don't know.

Knowledge is Power

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Pete is correct, as usual, and I would add that you should take the information from your C file and do a thorough job on your NOD. Cite specific examples. For example:

I disagree with the decision dated April 1, 2010 on the issues of Service Connection for PTSD and Pulmonary Fibrosis. I elect a DRO Review (or hearing, your choice). I believe the decision is incorrect for the following reasons:

1. On May, 1, 2009 I faxed a copy of a medical report from Dr. Smith to the Regional Office and have enclosed the fax recipt. This evidence was not listed in the "evidence" section, so the document was either mishandled by the RO, or the RO failed to consider it. If the RO had considered this evidence, but decided to deny the claim anyway, then the RO should have explained in the "reason and basis for decision" why this Veteran favorable medical report still did not warrant an approval of benefits.

2. The RO also failed to give an explanatory "reasons and basis" for denial of the Pulmonary Fibrosis when the evidence supports the Veterans claim. (Then list the medical exams and dates that you think support your claim)

3. There is evidence of "shredding" or mishandling of evidence by the RO. Altho the extent of shredding is unknown, regulations require the VA consider all the evidence before a decision is rendered.

Ima Veteran April 13, 2010

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PTSD claim will need proof of a nexus-if that is why they denied it-

did they mention if JSRRC attempted to validate your stressor?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PTSD claim will need proof of a nexus-if that is why they denied it-

did they mention if JSRRC attempted to validate your stressor?

Thanks to all of you who responded. There was no mention if JSRRC attempted to validate my stressors. Nor did they mention buddy letters that I sent in as evidence. The VA did award 10% for depression due to hearing loss and tinnitus. I really believe the VA took the easy way out by awarding the 10% hoping that I drop the PTSD claim. Thanks.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did they mention the PTSD claim at all in this decision?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did they mention the PTSD claim at all in this decision?

Yes they did. The denial states " The examiner states you do not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD as stated in the the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American

Psychiatric Association. I was assigned a GAF of 65, however the C&P exam states a GAF of 60. There is not much difference, but it is still a mistake along with the omission of some other details that I told the examiner. Like I stated before I was rated for 10% for depression due to hearing loss tinnitus. I think I was rated for that hoping to keep me from going any further on the claim. Thanks.

68mustang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use