Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Buddy Letters And Combat Or Non Combat Claims

Rate this question


Cm Burns

Question

Is using (lay evidence) buddy letters, nexus ect only for combat veterans or does this apply in claims for all vets. I was just reading here on hadit.com/forums about evaluating evidence and making decisions and It says lay evidence is for combat soldiers. Is that they case. I have several buddy letters ect in my claim due to no smr's if thats the case then I amnot getting approved. I worked in a hospital and we say a lot of people hurt in war I never went to a combat site however. We also treated injuries in ftx's done at Ft Stewart. I say ever thing from Hand gradnade injuries to women thrown off balcanies by they active duty husbands.

Any help would be appreciated.

Claim 1 & 2 /w pension Filed 10/23/2009 CnPs- Dec Phase 10/1/2010 Notification 10/12/2010 Closed 10/15/2010

Claim 3 Filed June 23,10 CNPs- Jan 2011 Dec Phase- Mar 2011 Notification- May 2011 Closed My 2011 (CLAIM DENIED)

Claim 4 Filed June 13,11 cnps-Na Dec Phase- Aug 2011 Notification- ...

Voc Rehab Claim Filed July 2011 Orientation-17 Aug 2011 Found Entitled- 17 Aug 2011 Classes paid- 19 Aug 2011 First Stipen Check- ...

***Under Ga VARO from 2009 - Until Present***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Buddy letters are even more important in non combat PTSD claims. Get as many letters as you can describing what incidents you witnessed. If you are a combat vet you often have combat badges. These verify stressors. Non combat PTSD stressor has to be proved with evidence. Buddy letters are evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Is using (lay evidence) buddy letters, nexus ect only for combat veterans or does this apply in claims for all vets. I was just reading here on hadit.com/forums about evaluating evidence and making decisions and It says lay evidence is for combat soldiers. Is that they case. I have several buddy letters ect in my claim due to no smr's if thats the case then I amnot getting approved. I worked in a hospital and we say a lot of people hurt in war I never went to a combat site however. We also treated injuries in ftx's done at Ft Stewart. I say ever thing from Hand gradnade injuries to women thrown off balcanies by they active duty husbands.

Any help would be appreciated.

Buddy letters may be necessary when military record evidence is lacking. They can help prove that you were at a certain place and time, or witnessed some event.

The VA will usually try to discount them any way it can. A notarized letter/statement may help if the case goes to appeal. The same general issues exist when non medical professionals

write a letter that is favorable to a claim. The letter writer must be careful to not give an opinion, and just state things that a "layman" might see or understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I talked to a service officer about this topic yesterday. You should also talk to your service and compare any info you get from a service officer with the info you get here.

The SO told me yesterday that a single buddy letter about stressful events is not winning claims. He said to get as many as you can. This also applys to secondary evidence of a stressor. Secondary evidence includes statements you made to other individuals at the time of the event and their observations of any chamge in behavior in you mood or behavior around the time of the event.

Also statements as to the types of injuries you worked with at the hospital could be used to support your job duties relative to your MOS or other known identification of your actually specialty in the military.

A single letter from someone in your chain of command would really help. If you need help finding active duty members I think there is a process where the military will get a letter to anybody you can remember if they are still on active duty.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to a service officer about this topic yesterday. You should also talk to your service and compare any info you get from a service officer with the info you get here.

The SO told me yesterday that a single buddy letter about stressful events is not winning claims. He said to get as many as you can. This also applys to secondary evidence of a stressor. Secondary evidence includes statements you made to other individuals at the time of the event and their observations of any chamge in behavior in you mood or behavior around the time of the event.

Also statements as to the types of injuries you worked with at the hospital could be used to support your job duties relative to your MOS or other known identification of your actually specialty in the military.

A single letter from someone in your chain of command would really help. If you need help finding active duty members I think there is a process where the military will get a letter to anybody you can remember if they are still on active duty.

my former cast clinic ncoic is listed as a witness. I will ask him for a letter in his own words. he agreed to be a witness but is in school and was unable to get me a letter so i enters a statement in support of cliam listing him. I am waiting on hime now. to contact me back.. i think he is in airborne school

Claim 1 & 2 /w pension Filed 10/23/2009 CnPs- Dec Phase 10/1/2010 Notification 10/12/2010 Closed 10/15/2010

Claim 3 Filed June 23,10 CNPs- Jan 2011 Dec Phase- Mar 2011 Notification- May 2011 Closed My 2011 (CLAIM DENIED)

Claim 4 Filed June 13,11 cnps-Na Dec Phase- Aug 2011 Notification- ...

Voc Rehab Claim Filed July 2011 Orientation-17 Aug 2011 Found Entitled- 17 Aug 2011 Classes paid- 19 Aug 2011 First Stipen Check- ...

***Under Ga VARO from 2009 - Until Present***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Any letters, you get, should be in the form of an affidavit. This is merely a notarized statement that states that this is a true statement and that it is signed under the penalties of perjury. Evidentiary wise, affidavits carry more weight. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use