Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

85 Year Old Vet Finally Gets Comped

Rate this question


gdsnide

Question

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

The VA should be sued over this!!!

"A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of 'up to and including my life."


10% 1992

10% 1995

10% 2000

10% 2005

10% 2010

10% 2015

2015- found out that I have Post Concussion Syndrome(not SC), Stationed at contaminated installations

Still at that great 10% !!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Delayed or improperly rejected claims at the VA “are a catastrophic problem,” says Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. “Marty should be labeled a hero for never giving up.”

part of the problem is despite the VA has never paid compensation for soldiers heart, shell shock or any of the other terms PTSD has been known by over the decades seems to be ignored here, if you read deeper into the article they granted him 70% TDIU in 1997 he would have been what 72 at the time he was probably already drawing SS at this point so he was probably one of the first retired men to get a claim granted at the TDIU rate for PTSD tthen they went back and granted him a 10% award from 1945 - 1997 probably in an attempt to shut him up and let him "win" but no he wants 100% back to 1945 and we all know that is never going to happen hell will freeze over first he wants 400,000 for back pay bottom line they won't pay it and we all pretty much assume that I am shocked they even gave him 10% back to 1945 to me that is just a huge win

some people see him as a hero in attempting to get the VA to correctly compensate him for PTSD back to WW2 as we all know the VA did not officially recognize PTSD as a compensable issue until the DSM III was published in 1980 did they pay any Nam veterans back to 1965 or 1971? No they paid them back to when DSM III was published

other people will see him as what is wrong with the PTSD compensation program he worked his entire life after he retired he fought with the VARO and finally got his PTSD granted and the article does not state his progression thru the percentages but I doubt he filed a claim and they gave him 70% TDIU on the first attempt so many people will look at him as one of the veterans who spent the entire time from when they left the military working and then when they retired they learned of the opportunity to improve their retirement compensation by filing a VA claim they won't look at how his PTSD agffected his life, how many jobs he held, his 4 divorces, other problems legal or booze etc all they will see is a greedy vet trying to get 400,000 as a lottery win before he dies and tis story will bring back out the veterans whose ships sank in WW2 and Korea and will be wanting back pay for PTSD back to the day the ship sank I feel sorry for the VSOs that will have to deal with them after all this guy got his claim paid they won't look at the part where he filed a stress claim in 1945 and found a way in 1997 to reopen the 1947 paperwork they will demand the same benefits this guy got 65 years later and it just ain't going to happen......I don't know if this is a blessing or a curse to tell you the truth

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I see this old vet as a guy who suffered for 50 years before the VA even admitted he suffered from the affects of combat stress. I know that soldiers who had breakdowns from acute combat fatigue were compensated if they never recovered. I don't know how many of these guys never recovered from mental breakdowns during combat, but there was no help for the thousands who lived with PTSD for the rest of their lives. The VA dianosed this old guy with severe anxiety in 1947. They denied his claim saying there was no record of such a DX in service. It does not take much imagination to understand that his problems more likely than not resulted from prolonged combat exposure. The old vet worked, but his life was wrecked by the war. I think he deserves every penny he can get. How many of these old guys are even alive? More die every day. The Greatest Generation who actually fought the war were treated like trash after Uncle Sam got what he wanted. I don't think there will be a rush of WWII vets since most are over 80 years old. If they can get compensated for PTSD more power to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use