Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lost Cue The Impossible Dream

Rate this question


john999

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

My CUE at the BVA was denied. The BVA admitted that the VA excluded my doctor's evidence in my 1973 decision. However, they said that even if they had not excluded the evidence of "Chronic Schizophrenia" that I would still only be ratable at 10%. The BVA said that a statement from a VA doctor on the locked psychiatric ward that I got on well with the other mental patients was all they needed to deny that I was low balled on my rating. My doctor said I could not work or function in society. This is what reasonable minds conclude that life on a locked ward is the same as life on the outside. It is more complicated but that is the basic idea. My lawyer is taking it to CAVA. The VA said also that no matter how unfair a decision is that does not make a CUE. If they never gave you appeal rights that is also not a CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

John keep fighting on, I don't know if the BVA stated an oxymoron or they were just being a moron.

Are you sure you sent this to the BVA and not OWCP, I thought OWCP was the only agency who could bring new meaning of understanding to the English language. :wacko:

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My CUE was for a higher percentage. What the VA did was to just exclude evidence from my psychologist who treated me for six months. My doctor said I was getting worse. The BVA admitted this fact. They let in evidence from a VA doctor who saw me one time on the locked ward. I never had a C&P exam. My psychologist's evidence was the only evidence that followed the criteria for an exam. The VA relied completely on my SMR's, statements from unnamed witnesses about drug abuse, and a single sentence from a VA doctor. What the VA said was that the evidence for a higher rating than 10% was not undebateable. Nothing is undebateable. Some people believe the world is flat. According to the VA's I don't think any vet can meet that standard of proof. It is a fraud. It was not a case about weighing the evidence. It was about excluding evidence. What the VA says is regardless of the exclusion of evidence you cannot meet our impossible burden anyway. The VA can exclude any evidence they want in a final decision and you still can't win a CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My CUE was for a higher percentage. What the VA did was to just exclude evidence from my psychologist who treated me for six months. My doctor said I was getting worse. The BVA admitted this fact. They let in evidence from a VA doctor who saw me one time on the locked ward. I never had a C&P exam. My psychologist's evidence was the only evidence that followed the criteria for an exam. The VA relied completely on my SMR's, statements from unnamed witnesses about drug abuse, and a single sentence from a VA doctor. What the VA said was that the evidence for a higher rating than 10% was not undebateable. Nothing is undebateable. Some people believe the world is flat. According to the VA's I don't think any vet can meet that standard of proof. It is a fraud. It was not a case about weighing the evidence. It was about excluding evidence. What the VA says is regardless of the exclusion of evidence you cannot meet our impossible burden anyway. The VA can exclude any evidence they want in a final decision and you still can't win a CUE.

x

x

x

I think you will win at COAVC. Your attorney thinks so too, or he would tell you otherwise.

Your attny should provide you with Precedent cases that he's going to cite/submit with his Appeal; otherwise, you will be setting Precedent.

I haven't read court cases for awhile, because I have some genuine cognative dissonance at present (keeping my distance mentally from the VA). My CUE should be decided by the VARO soon, and when I get it, I'll plug myself back into reading and writing.

The BVA has conceded Error, but they are loathe to call it "clear and umistakable". In my mind, withholding critical material evidence (proving the veteran's innocence) runs afoul of constititional law. In a real court of law, witholding evidence is a crime.

See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the prosecution had withheld from the criminal defendant certain evidence. The defendant challenged his conviction, arguing it had been contrary to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

John, It's ain't over yet, sorry to say. ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Never give up and remember your fight can help other Veterans. In the early 1990's a very special Veteran named Gardner from Palestine Texas took on the whole rotten system the VA had in place that actually allowed their butchers to mangle and harm you to skate and not even have to pay a dime. His win made it possible for 1151 Vets to be service connected and no one said the guy had a chance.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Oh, I am going to fight to the bitter end. My lawyer wants to fight as well. I just see that the current CUE system is a fraud. It is the only way for a vet to modify an old decision that was not appealed. The VA actually said that even though the VA did not provide me with appeal rights in 1973 that is no CUE. They also said that no matter how unfair a decision is that is not a CUE. That leads to the question of just what would be a CUE? I am getting more pissed everytime I think about it. I already told the lawyer to go ahead to the CAVA. I will sign the papers and do whatever else is required. It is a legal argument now. It is not about evidence or even about me. It is about the law and due process. I will quit ranting about it. How far can you get outside the VA system with a claim? Is CAVA the last appeal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Oh, I am going to fight to the bitter end. My lawyer wants to fight as well. I just see that the current CUE system is a fraud. It is the only way for a vet to modify an old decision that was not appealed. The VA actually said that even though the VA did not provide me with appeal rights in 1973 that is no CUE. They also said that no matter how unfair a decision is that is not a CUE. That leads to the question of just what would be a CUE? I am getting more pissed everytime I think about it. I already told the lawyer to go ahead to the CAVA. I will sign the papers and do whatever else is required. It is a legal argument now. It is not about evidence or even about me. It is about the law and due process. I will quit ranting about it. How far can you get outside the VA system with a claim? Is CAVA the last appeal?

x

x

x

Levels of Appeal

VARO (VA Regional Office)

DRO (Decision Review Officer)

BVA (Board of Vets Appeals)

AMC (Appeals Management Center, Tiger Team, etc.)

COAVC (Coart of Appeal for Vets Claims)

Federal Circuit

*Personal Hearing is possible at any level of appeal.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use