Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Decreasing Vet Disability Claims

Rate this question


COOL BREEZE

Question

This is in regards to those who think that one way to reduce the budget is to decrease the money paid to Vet Claims for disability. (various news stories on this and other forums) There are those who think that just the severely wounded Vets from combat should only receive compensation. Claims for sexual dysfunction, hemorrhoids(just using this as example only), ect should be discontinued. Oh we can really cut down on the billions paid out on VA claims yearly. Here is some food for thought. When you join the military,Uncle Sam owns your body. When you have to lug around hundreds of pounds of equipment, straining your back, eating high cholestrol military food , working in a noisy environment-flight deck, airfield ect. you just did your job as what the military expects. This is not a laid back civilian job 8-5 pm. We folks in the military are very unique. We serve our country . The damage done to our bodies caused by the military things we do are justified by the compensation that we have to fight for long and hard. The government owes us vets for all the physical and mental issues caused by our service. :ohmy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Statistically speaking,

how much of the Federal budget is actually spent on veteran's medical needs?

Not the Grand-Total amount supposedly allocated to all things in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

I'm curious if our stats hungry government even knows how much is health care and how much is spent on window dressing?

Parade grounds, staff cars, wasted space, extra employees and shrubs don't count as health care.

After they almost killed me cleaning out an artery I was sent home a bleeding, dripping, bloody mess because they couldn't afford a new bandage to cover up the worst suturing job I have ever seen.

Not enough money in the budget of intensive care.

Intensive care was in the process of an expansion while I was there.

Adding 4 new beds in a totally, newly constructed area that was being added on.

(That's what they told me and my wife, I ain't making this up.)

I had to leave the medical facility grounds and go to the nearest grocery store for bandaging materials so my wife could replace the dripping stuff with new materials.

I had bled through the hospital bandaging stuff onto my clothing before they released me to go home and dripping blood onto the carseat was not a good idea.

sledge

Sorry to hear about the terrible care they provided. Thats why if they tell me I need surgery, I will use my tri-care Prime and get another referral, and If i need surgery, you can bet the VA won;t being doing that. My sister(before she passed medically retired from the VA from a back injury-the lifting of patients,ect) used to tell me(she was a registered nurse) the horror stories going on. Yes the cutting off the wrong leg,arm,finger ect-whoops I am sorry, now we have to do the right now was correct. Now I know that was years ago-don't know if that is still going on. But that what this forum is for-to teach us so we know what to expect-and make sure you ask the appropriate questions. Yikes-amputation of the wrong leg-cut me a break:ohmy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Veterans should be compensated for their service if their disability is real. Thankfully, 99.99% who claim to be disabled are. Perhaps if all servicemembers who deserve compensation for their disabilities ARE compensated, then conditions for our next generation of Veterans will improve. The military will work to create a safer, more productive environment for soldiers when they realize that through doing so they are saving money down the road.

Douglas Rohde

4th Ranger Training Battalion, Fort Benning, GA

drohde@vetlawyers.com

www.vetlawyers.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Veterans should be compensated for their service if their disability is real.

Thankfully, 99.99% who claim to be disabled are.

Perhaps if all servicemembers who deserve compensation for their disabilities ARE compensated, then conditions for our next generation of Veterans will improve.

The military will work to create a safer, more productive environment for soldiers when they realize that through doing so they are saving money down the road.

drohde,

We got compensated for our service while we were active duty.

As veterans, if appropriate - we can be compensated for our disabilities that relate in some way to our time on

active duty.

There's just too many brothers and sister's out there trying to judge just who it is, that have "real" disability/s.

How is one vet to know, if another veterans disability is real ?

What would one even attempt to measure it by ?

It would sure help vets and the VA if the VA were a bit more willing to provide preventative health care to veterans,

this would truly save money down the road, and possibly a few more lives.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That ex-senator Simpson from Wyoming is on some panel that is working with Obama to find ways to cut the deficit. Simpson was complaining that disabled veterans were not helping because they were getting too much in the way of compensation. It was on MSNBC today. The panel is looking to cut medicare, SSA and veteran benefits as a way to reduce budget. I am not making this up. I don't think it is going to happen under current administration,but even talking about it while giving tax cuts to billionaires is crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ex-senator Simpson from Wyoming is on some panel that is working with Obama to find ways to cut the deficit. Simpson was complaining that disabled veterans were not helping because they were getting too much in the way of compensation. It was on MSNBC today. The panel is looking to cut medicare, SSA and veteran benefits as a way to reduce budget. I am not making this up. I don't think it is going to happen under current administration,but even talking about it while giving tax cuts to billionaires is crazy.

I think I have created an unpleasant hot topic which I would like all of of the members here to share there views. Whatever you can contribute to who is behind this issue so we can stay on top of this would be greatly appreciated . That way when it comes time for election time-we know who not to vote for. As i mentioned, this started out in the local papers, now has spread to the networks. Not good.:wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

We need to keep the politics out of this one. Interesting topic. A vet is a Vet regardless of wether he served in a period of war or wether he floated around in the USS bathtub guarding the drain plug.

If they served, they are veterans, regardless of when they served.

Folks with the attitude that differentiates usually dont hang around Hadit too long.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use