Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mets Question

Rate this question


COOL BREEZE

Question

On my Compensation exam done in June it states under Cardiomegaly-Functional limitations :Mets

reason Mets estimated only *Estimated Mets 5-7 based on exertion limited to types of activities such as climbing stairs, carrying objects 30-60 lbs, shoveling dirt,walking 4-5 mph.

Reason Mets estimated only:patient not able to walk on treadmill due to back and feet disabilities. pt had reaction to chemical stress test earlier this year when had chest pain evaluation. Effects on daily activities:none, effects on usual occupation:none.

Then under the impression/summary its states Mild cardiomegaly without evidence of ischemic disease documented by a negative persantine-thallium cardiac stress test.

The rating charts show a 30% rating for the Mets, however-I have been up nightly trying to figure if what the summary stated will wipe that out and give me a 0% I know how the doctor writes this up determines what you will get, and if they write this up per what the rating is for that category is supposed to determine what you get. But when the doctor writes something up and contradicts it in the summary I wonder If this will go against me. And this is exactly how my whole exam went with other issues. I would appreciate if someone who is familiar about this Mets issue could explain it to me what this means. By the way, the next idiot who tries to give this chemical stress again better stand by. A heart hospital gave me this test because my blood pressure was too high and I was on too many medications. I thought I was dying, was passing out cause I wasn't recovering from this test even with the refersal drug. They told me they were going to call an ambulance(the hospital was in the next block) if I didn't wake up. More drugs, after 2 hrs I limped out of the clinic and straight to bed rest for several days-don't get this test!!!!:ohmy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I think you may have problems with no evidence of Ischemic heart disease. They will have see if you have any of the others such as CAD, MI, ect.

Just my opinion, I hope I am wrong.

Dave

Edited by rotorhead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you may have problems with no evidence of Ischemic heart disease. They will have see if you have any of the others such as CAD, MI, ect.

Just my opinion, I hope I am wrong.

Dave

Yes-they wrote Mild cardiomegaly without evidence of ischemic heart disease documented by a negative persantine-thallium cardiac stress test. Also the ratings for the LVE say-left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent. So it could mean possible -30-60% perhaps based on these tests. They stated on the myocardial stress/rest test done at a heart hospital 50%-normal-but the VA assigns a 60% rating-am I missing something here? I can see why this got sent from the rating board back to development. Maybe a coin toss will decide this outcome:wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know I had a treadmill test and the chemical test. If one test says you have a problem and the other doesn't then you should get the benefit of doubt. This is what happened to me. I got 60% based on contradictory evidence from both tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes-they wrote Mild cardiomegaly without evidence of ischemic heart disease documented by a negative persantine-thallium cardiac stress test. Also the ratings for the LVE say-left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent. So it could mean possible -30-60% perhaps based on these tests. They stated on the myocardial stress/rest test done at a heart hospital 50%-normal-but the VA assigns a 60% rating-am I missing something here? I can see why this got sent from the rating board back to development. Maybe a coin toss will decide this outcome:wacko:

Please correct me I answer your post because I thought you were a Vietnam vet and was already rated for heart disease. Is that not the case?

Also I did a goggle of your heart disease:

Cardiomegaly is the abnormal enlargement of the heart and is also known as macrocardia or megalocardia. Mild cardiomegaly is a common heart condition in many people and is more prevalent among athletes. The exact cause of the condition is not known but medical research shows that underlying conditions are the cause in most cases. Some common causes of this condition are valvular disease, congenital heart disorders, and alcoholic cardiomyopathy. In some cases, it is possible that mild cardiomegaly is a symptom of a more serious, under-lying disease or illness. The most common diseases likely to cause mild cardiomegaly are Ischemic heart disease, heart cancer and 1q deletion. Mild cardiomegaly can affect people of all age groups and sexes.

Hmm this looks like what Berta said VA would do for this illness they are going to try any and all tricks not to award.

If I were you I would wait for the rating but if you do not get something you are happy with I would use the above and anything else out there to fight it!!

Edited by stillhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please correct me I answer your post because I thought you were a Vietnam vet and was already rated for heart disease. Is that not the case?

Also I did a goggle of your heart disease:

Cardiomegaly is the abnormal enlargement of the heart and is also known as macrocardia or megalocardia. Mild cardiomegaly is a common heart condition in many people and is more prevalent among athletes. The exact cause of the condition is not known but medical research shows that underlying conditions are the cause in most cases. Some common causes of this condition are valvular disease, congenital heart disorders, and alcoholic cardiomyopathy. In some cases, it is possible that mild cardiomegaly is a symptom of a more serious, under-lying disease or illness. The most common diseases likely to cause mild cardiomegaly are Ischemic heart disease, heart cancer and 1q deletion. Mild cardiomegaly can affect people of all age groups and sexes.

Hmm this looks like what Berta said VA would do for this illness they are going to try any and all tricks not to award.

If I were you I would wait for the rating but if you do not get something you are happy with I would use the above and anything else out there to fight it!!

I am not a vietnam vet-was in the Navy from 1976-1996. The VA had given me a ekg that said I had enlarged heart. So then I went to a heart hospital to have all the test given. Just have high blood pressure amoung a few other isssues, Also hardening of the arteries. I though I was about to die or somwtning so my military doctor on base for tri care Prime ordered all these test. I think they reverse what the VA said I had'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know I had a treadmill test and the chemical test. If one test says you have a problem and the other doesn't then you should get the benefit of doubt. This is what happened to me. I got 60% based on contradictory evidence from both tests.

Wow-thats nice. Cause I had a spine exam and the motion flex test states 0-10, all motions-that would be a least a 30%, then this tread mill test would be rated at 30%-estimated Mets-(currently at 30%) and that is not all the issues waiting at my "threw everything but the kitchen sink at them" . Probably thats why its taking them so long. They probably are trying to figure out a good excuse to low ball me cause they can't have me going from 30% to 70-80%. that would be to steep of an increase-we need to defer these issues for at least another few years. My exam results match the rating chart to a T or a few issues.:smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use