Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd

Rate this question


grent

Question

HI GOOD AFTERNOON. MY CURRENT RATE IS 100% P AND T JUST GOT REMOVED FROM TDIU BOUT YEAR AGO

MY PROBLEM IS THIS ONE OF MY SC'S WAS FOR MOOD DISORDER THEN THE VA DID AN OOPS RECLASSIFIED ME TO 70% PTSD.

I KEEP APPEALING AND SHOWING MY LIFETIME GAF OF 40 PLUS MY VO-REHAB DISMISSAL LETTER SAYING IM NO LONGER ABLE TO STAY IN THE PROGRAM PLUS ALL MY PYSCH REPORTS STATING I SHOULD BE 100% PTSD

VA STILL CONTINUES TO LEAVE ME AT 70% WHEN IN FACT OTHER VETS GET 100% PTSD FOR GAF OF 55 OR HIGHER

BUDDY MINE SAID JUST KEEP APPEALING EVENTUALLY VA WILL WAKE UP SMELL THE COFFE

ANYONE HERE STUCK IN THIS SITUATION OR FINALLY GOTTEN 100% PTSD

ILL BE GLAD WHEN I FINALLY GET ADVANCED TO 100% PTSD

ANY THOUGHTS HERE THANKS

GT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

grent - you've really lost me. Please quote the regs you're talking about. Some vietnam vet friend said doesn't cut it. In '89, I believe, 4.16c became effective and was rescinded on 10/8/96. It required anyone w/a single disability of PTSD rated at 70%, unable to work due to that disability, to be rated at 100% A schedular rating of 100% requires the VA to infer HB or A&A. Were you rated during that period?? You're just confusing me.

pr

I was on tdiu then i filed some more claims based on lost records and i told the VA my mood was not mood but PTSD months later without even telling me brown envelope comes in the mail

and it brown envelope does not say hi hello you are kicked off tdiu it drabbles on in the VA mumbo jumbo legal dictum so i had to call DAV and they told me I was removed from TDIU granted 100% P and T and my mood was re-classified as PTSD but only at 70% because during that time frame VA put a directive out to all VARO's NO MORE 100% PTSD because VA started to see a spike in 100% PTSD awards

friend of mine said yeah of course VA saw a spike in 100% PTSD claims because at that time 2 things happened the law changed on PTSD and a lot of troops were going to and returning from Afgahnistan and Iraq and a lot of troops were going to counseling seesions like mine and those sessions the out patient vet PTSD group sessions i went to were completely filled up.

In the intrem of this mess i met a viet nam friend in one of my vet sessions and he looks over the new decision i got he tells me the va is way off base in fact the VA did not look at the whole picture in regard to my PTSD and in fact because i cant go back to work because of my PTSD plus having a GAF of 40 not only should the VA have awarded me 100% for PTSD but in fact should have considered and awarded SMC because also the law changed on vets who got and approached 100% scs in regard to SMC

so now i have re-applied again for 100% PTSD and the SMC denial is on appeal timely appealed form 9 @ the BVA

The issue here is actually three things as i see it maybe im wrong correct me if i am

first PTSD was on the TV a lot in 2000 not only for the military but work in general,

then the VA started giving extremely high awards for PTSD then a directive got sent to all VARO's to stop awarding 100% PTSD awards

then after that happened the law changed on PTSD and the VA based on the complete medical record and new law that if only one of the conditions is met in my case not able to

substantially secure gainfull employment and its because of PTSD then the veteran is awarded 100% PTSD but that did not happen to me i got 70% BO BO BO

Of course chronic pain FROM MY APPROVED STRESSOR causes high blood pressure which in turn causes depression but thats only one small part of my PTSD picture va failed to catch the fact i cannot "SECURE GAINFULL EMPLOYMENT" its my opinion I have met the standard for 100% PTSD

so now i have to wait but its based on federal law and continuity of cases if you do it for one you have to do it for all

but to comment further most service organizations and veterans i have talked to feel that if only one of the conditions is met for 100% then the veteran is should be awarded 100% PTSD

if not then the whole psychological record should be re- evaluated to see if the veteran can still qualify for 100% PTSD and then if that happens then the question is because the law changed

on smc awards

then the VA would have to consider elegibility for smc after the decision was made to grant 100% PTSD i think now law changed va has to consider smc on all award s even approaching or definately at 100% either tdiu or schedular here again correct me if im wrong

thats how i see the PTSD issue on 100% PTSD awards but here again i could be completely wrong and off base no problem correct me if i am

but i would like to see more articles and hear what other veterans are going through or have gone through with PTSD awards I try to read as much as i can on PTSD and try to piece together how the rating law applies to me.

thks

grt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the va mis diagnosed me and said i have mood disorder then later down the road they re-classified my mood as PTSD and gave me 70% when in fact based on my not being able to obtain gainfull employment because of my PTSD the va should have given me 100% PTSD THAT DIDNT HAPPEN I GOT 70% PTSD THATS ABOUT TO CHANGE !!

now the laws changed once they give me 100% Ptsd they will have to consider smc but going back when i was removed from TDIU and granted 100% P and T (70% PTSD included) the VA should have considered SMC and going back even further if i read the law right when I was placed on TDIU at that point VA should have considered SMC THAT DIDNT HAPPEN EITHER

it s really nothing major everyone i talked TO tells me just to keep re-filing for the 100% PTSD and eventually i will get it JUST LIKE ALL MY OTHER VET FRIENDS DID THEY WENT THROUGH THE SAME THING

The reason why i will get is because of "CONTINUITY OF CASES."

THE REASONING HERE IS IF YOU DO IT FOR ONE YOU DO IT FOR ALL

I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT IT I KNOW AT SOME POINT I WILL GET IT JUST LIKE I KNOW I WILL GET SMC

ITS NOT A QUESTION OF HOW OR WHY ITS JUST A MATTER OF WHEN

I CAN WAIT THEM OUT THATS ALL !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

grent - you've really lost me. Please quote the regs you're talking about. Some vietnam vet friend said doesn't cut it. In '89, I believe, 4.16c became effective and was rescinded on 10/8/96. It required anyone w/a single disability of PTSD rated at 70%, unable to work due to that disability, to be rated at 100% A schedular rating of 100% requires the VA to infer HB or A&A. Were you rated during that period?? You're just confusing me.

pr

Phillip, he is confusing me, also. But, I have decided that I have not enough time in the day to try and figure out some of these postings. Especially in cases such as this, when the poster has already convinced themselves of the righteousness of their cause. It also is disconcerting when I read repetitions of self-encouragement.

If I feel that I can help someone, I will try very hard to do so, but, I will not become entangled in someone else's thought processes, which I see that this has the possibility of becoming..............

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you add Bradley v Peake to it then should not the VA consider IU and 100% schedular as equal in all but name. They are equal regarding SMC potential in most cases as I read the long and confusing Bradley 2008. So how are they different for a mental disability? There is almost no difference. If you extrapolate from Bradley then when a vet gets IU for a single disability that would be almost exactly the same as 100% schedular. Read Bradley and see if you agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you add Bradley v Peake to it then should not the VA consider IU and 100% schedular as equal in all but name. They are equal regarding SMC potential in most cases as I read the long and confusing Bradley 2008. So how are they different for a mental disability? There is almost no difference. If you extrapolate from Bradley then when a vet gets IU for a single disability that would be almost exactly the same as 100% schedular. Read Bradley and see if you agree.

HERES WHAT WILL HAPPEN THE VA WILL HAVE TO AWARD ME 100% PTSD BASED ON MY SOCIAL SITUATION WHEN THAT HAPPENS BRADLEY V PEAK AND THE OTHER NEW LAWS REGARDING SMC SHOULD KICK IN

AND I WILL BE REVIEWED FOR SMC BASED ON MY SMC ISSUES WHICH I WILL HOPEFULLY GRANTED

AFTER YOU ARE REMOVED FROM TDIU AND GRANTED 100% P AND T THEIR ARE ONLY CERTAIN CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH YOU ARE GRANTED SMC

I FEEL CONFIDENT IN READING ALL THE OTHER POSTS THAT FOLLOW ALONG THE SAME AREAS AS MINE

FOR ME ITS NOT A QUESTION OF HOW ITS JUST A MATTER OF WHEN

THANKS I CAN SEE WHERE I AM HEADING NOW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use