Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Brown Envelope Just Arrived

Rate this topic


COOL BREEZE

Recommended Posts

Now I just received the official brown envelope, the fax copy they send you doesn't list the reasons why they deny you at all

I went from 20-50%

Approval 1.Special K for sexual dysfunction

2. Dependency

3. Functional heart murmur Nd cardiomegaly-30%

Denied 1 Arthherosclerotic vascular disease

2.Nocturia(nighttime urinary frequency0

Following haven't changed 1. Cervical strain

2. Bilateral hearing loss

Claim left out-NP

Just read the back page-how dumb can I get!! It said you spoke of chronic fatigue, dribbling of urine,drowsiness and tiredness but you didn't make it clear that you were seeking service connection for those conditions. During your VA examination, you also complained of tinnius. If you wish to file a form-yeh, here we go again. How clear must I be that I am filing a claim when is listed on the contention list.

And the big surprise was my cervical-denied for increase even though the doctor wrote a good response-0-10 degrees flex-helicopter crash. All those rear in accidents that made it worst-you have suffered intercurrent injuries not related with your military service. Therefore your increased symptomatology is not part of the in-service injury, but aggrevated by the more recent injuries which occured after separation from service as noted by comparing the baseline manifestation in the VA examination done in 1996 and the findings subsequent to the post service injuries

No diagnosis for coronary during active service. I have that now, but I think because of my blood pressure this could be secondary as I have diagnosed been with arterosclerotic vascular disease.

Finally-the 30% for cardiomegaly failed to note from the results of the heart hospital that I have 50% for left ventricular dysfunction-it states 60-50% required to get the higher 60%.

Now I am very pleased that i got up to the 50% to give me most of my military pension. Now it looks like a have a rather long road to travel. I suppose I need to file a notice of disagreement and file a new claim again.

Last but not least, I need to apologize for acting like a jerk on this forum, I understand the object of this forum is to help others and I feel some of the things I may have done or stated were probably out of line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Cool Breeze, Goood for you. Yes put in more claims for your other issues, and NOD for those you got denied. CHANGE YOUR AVATAR TO REFLECT YOUR NEW 50% TOO! GAME PLAYING IS UNFORTUNATELY WHAT THE VA ENJOY DOING. Just keep submitting your evidence along with your claims too. Hang in there it could take yrs to get what you ultimately are seeking.:smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool Breeze, Goood for you. Yes put in more claims for your other issues, and NOD for those you got denied. CHANGE YOUR AVATAR TO REFLECT YOUR NEW 50% TOO! GAME PLAYING IS UNFORTUNATELY WHAT THE VA ENJOY DOING. Just keep submitting your evidence along with your claims too. Hang in there it could take yrs to get what you ultimately are seeking.:smile:

I just don't understand why they deny some claims when the evidence is starring right at them, so I just NOD the claims they denied-then file separate claims on all the other issues-this will be a never ending cycle. But what the heck-this is my own hobby now, the pay off is any increase that I may get. Thanks for the response-and yes I'll change my rating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) I just don't understand why they deny some claims when the evidence is starring right at them,

2) so I just NOD the claims they denied-then file separate claims on all the other issues-this will be a never ending cycle.

CB,

Congrats, another step up the ladder for you.

1) Study and post if you can - the Evidence and Reasons and Bases Sections,

that is where your answers to understanding are.

2) Yes, NOD what you don't agree with.

No, I personally would NOT "file separate claims on all the other issues".

This is referred to as piece-meal type work, VBA is NOT supposed to do it

and we as claimants shouldn't either.

It just adds more confusion and clogs the wheels.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use