Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Wife Called About This Big Brown Envelope

Rate this topic


71M10

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

congrats on the SC for heart disease now just make sure it keeps beating my ejection fraction is less than 30% and has been since Oct 2002 so the meds do work there isn't any surgeon that will touch me anymore for anything so I keep taking the meds and keep hoping I wake up tomorrow it has worked so far keep your doc appts and listen to the spousal unit not listening could be hazardous to your health I don't care how good your heart is rofl

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Greetings all:

The Spousal Unit called me at work(AKA she who must be obeyed), a large big brown envelope was in the mail. I had her open it. She read - I listened - I smiled.

They have approved the hypertensive heart disease at 60%

Cervical Spine is service connected at 0% (wrong but I need to read to see if it is worth appealing).

It only took three years for an initial decision, but they didn't try to lowball me on the hypertensive heart disease. I was worried because they say 50% LVEF and the regs read 30 to 50 not through 50.

Thank you all for the encouragement!

Best regards,

Tyler

Congrat as well-this is exactly what I am appealing. Sent in a reconsideration with letter from a heart hospital stating mine was estimated at 50%, should have been given a 60%, not a 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is Good news!

Three years- that is awful and many even wait longer than that.

Was the cervical a SC Zero?

Yes, they gave the cervical spine a 0%. The follow up medical opinion they requested the doctor said full range of motion (never checked). I had already put them on notice that an exam on the cervical spine was not completed and pointed out they cannot accept "full range of motion" without the measurements. They SC it and list it as an immediate exam requested for ROM. They differed almost all of my secondary claims for my thoracic spine - so after three years it looks like they might ask for exams for them.

All in all I am pleased with where it is at right now, not done but the biggest (and strongest evidence) items are rated properly.

Thanks for all you do for Vets.

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Great news but I am wondering if all these recent awards and denials were a puch to clear the decks before October 1st

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read your SOC and see how to advance with your claim. The reasons they decided and all the other evidence too. Keep plugging along till you get what you want. Don't stop believing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use