Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

‘Treat The Root’ Of Va Claims Backlog"

Rate this question


JHawks

Question

Legion: ‘Treat the root’ of VA claims backlog

By Marty Callaghan - March 3, 2011tetz_030311_p1_1.jpg

Legislative Director Tim Tetz testifies before the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Photo by Craig RobertsTestifying before a March 2 congressional hearing on the Department of Veterans Affairs fiscal 2012 budget proposal, The American Legion called upon VA to “treat the root” of the disability claims backlog problem.

At the hearing, American Legion Legislative Director Tim Tetz told members of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs that VA’s disability claims system “is broken because VA places undue stress on the number of claims processed, and minimal stress on accuracy.”

Referring to VA’s new Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS), Tetz said, “IT tools that are only used to implement the old system will just allow VA to make the same old mistakes faster.

“This budget gives VA quite a bit of money to implement IT programs and initiatives – but does it fix it all the way?” Tetz asked. “VA must build a system that tracks individual error and holds stations accountable for not only the volume of work done, but also the accuracy of the work.”

Repeating concerns expressed at a House hearing last week, Tetz urged Congress to “at least meet the previous levels of funding.” While The American Legion has recommended $2 billion for major and minor VA construction projects, the fiscal 2012 budget calls for about $1.2 billion.

Despite The American Legion’s concerns about the claims backlog and the construction budget, Tetz said the organization “remains cautiously optimistic that the fiscal 2012 budget proposal will meet the needs of our nation’s veterans. We appreciate the efforts VA has made towards addressing the symptoms and issues that currently face our nation’s veterans.”

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Simply put those who make bad decisions that tie claims up for years and than reversed need to go. Old school is that decision makers need to be accountable. I do think that any one at VARO should have the right to escalate a complicated claim without being hurt but the claims that are escalated should meet the criteria of a complicated claim.

Also the more training and the harder the claims the higher the reward should be for those who step up.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There should be a time limit that if the VA goes past that limit due to their own fault the claim is automatically approved. Interest should also be paid to the vet when the VA denies a claim due to incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There should be a time limit that if the VA goes past that limit due to their own fault the claim is automatically approved. Interest should also be paid to the vet when the VA denies a claim due to incompetence.

Think about what you are saying, John. That if the claim goes past a deadline then that claim is automatically approved. We have VA employees now, at this point, that are afraid to rate a multi-thousand dollar claim, so, if they just casually put the c-file over in the corner somewhere then after 2 or 3 years........it's approved.......by nobody......no harm done............except for the veteran who has now, after this extended waiting period......lost his wife, home, car, self-esteem.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Now, I must say, the VA's form #21-526EZ is certainly a step in the right direction.

And, this claim, properly used and properly completed, is where a good VSO can be "worth their weight in gold", for a good VSO should be able to look at this claim form and the required paper work and be able to tell whether this claim is gonna fly, BEFORE clogging up the system with useless paper work.

I'm getting decisions back in less than a month.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'd agree that the VA system is broken, and has been so for decades.

How to fix it is the big question. Bureaucrats will just stumble along in the same old ways, until something major forces change.

In other-words, the system needs radical change/replacement.

The problem is that no one can agree as to how the system should be changed or replaced.

Different factions that might drive change do not see eye to eye.

There are factions that, if any major change is made, that the change must reduce the costs to the government at the expense of veterans.

Others insist that any changes not disturb the present system, or benefits.

Some think, (As I do) that SSA (Who is far from the ideal) might be able to better process veterans claims as an alternate, and perhaps a replacement for the VA claims system.

(Obviously, this gets back to factions not agreeing, etc.)

Another possible cost saving has to do with Medicare, and the limited availability of "local" VA medical services.

Again, in my opinion, the VA is poorly setup to provide Urgent and Emergency medical care. Such care needs to be available to veterans in a time frame that is often less than hours,

and within a reasonable distance of much less than an hours travel. Critical Care often needs to start and be effective within "Golden Time" frames. This may be within minutes, or as long as three hours.

A short time frame example might be a Stroke, and a longer time frame certain kinds of heart attacks. In both cases, the potential damage and chance of death increases with time before treatment.

It would be more efficient and less expensive to use the medicare system to provide such care, and have the VA pay the Medicare deductibles and

monthly "B" plan costs. For the "average" veteran, the conventional medical care system has many advantages- - usually such things as local facilities and capabilities, private doctors

who generally know the patient, and take the time to review the patients history, and so forth.

I believe the VA has several areas that it might and should concentrate on, instead of trying to provide for all. Most of these areas deal with things that are very unique to disabled veterans.

Currently the VA's practices/proceedures related to coverage for emergency treatment are utterly insane, and actually are intended to drastically limit the VA's costs, rather than benefit a veteran needing immediate care.

In the case of a veteran that is entitled to no cost care from the VA, the VA should pay all costs when they cannot provide the needed care in a timely manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There should be some carrot and stick in the claims process for the VA. I have felt the stick on my back as a vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use