Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Interesting Turn Of Events

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

Good morning crew -

Some history: filed a claim for GERD in 2009. Have all proof in my service records AND an IMO from the treating physician. Had the C&P which showed the reaction on screen during the test (had to swallow the awful thick chalky stuff -gross). Been sending emails to my VSO, using IRIS to check status and getting nowhere. I'm now approaching the one-year mark on a claim that should have been a "no-brainer", and forwarded a form 9 to my VSO in preparation for the issue going to appeal. The following email transaction happens (please be patient - it's long):

VSO: Why a form 9? You use a form 9 after a statement of a case. You have not had a statement of a case

Me: I thought I had to submit within a year of notification letter denying the claim. In reading the instructions, though, it says I have a year or 60 days from the SOC or SSOC date, whichever gives me the most time. Since I've not received a SOC I assume the 1-year from notification stands? I can only guess that since they've not responded, or consider this claim closed I will end up with another appeal. I wanted to make sure the document was ready to submit as I'm getting close to the 1 year mark from the date on the notification letter denying the claim - I don't have it with me, but my email traffic with your note re: reconsideration started mid-April 2010. Let me know if I need to go in a different direction, or if I need to submit a different form.

VSO: Has the reconsideration been denied?

Me: Don't know. They insist there's been no reconsideration, so I can only guess and follow the next step in the process.

VSO: Dr. letter we sent on the GERD reconsideration in March of 2010 and the 4142 that claim was denied?

Me: I've enclosed the latest response re: the claim: (Inserted the IRIS response here) I have nothing from the VA since the letter in April 2010, and was under the impression that reconsideration was progressing. Regardless, if this is what the VA insists is the status of this claim, I'm running out of time and don't want to lose the claim date.

VSO: I have reviewed your file and the GERD has not even been touched by the VA so I have placed it in the VA system thru the Coach and you will be hearing from them immediately. the claim will have a date of claim of 1 year as of 3/10/2010. They are a year behind on the claim already so they have to jump on the claim now. So you will be really busy getting your claim completed and the other claim which has been pending also. The appeal which is certified is on hold until these claims are completed. If they are not completed prior to the file going to DC your claims won't have a chance of completing fairly without your original claim file.

My first reaction was - this is a joke, right?? My VSO's been telling me for a year that everything was fine on their end, just be patient. NOW I see this response, and don't know what to make of it. I assume this is a good thing as the claim will finally see the light of day. Any suggestions on what to do next? They should have everything they need for the decision. HELP!!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Justriuk,

Something to think about....

When you file a NOD, you can request a Decision Review Officer to review your case. You don't need to file Form 9 at this time. By using a DRO it keeps the review process within your RO and thus maybe have less of a wait for review.

If you don't like the decision of a DRO, you can then file a Form 9 to put your claim into the traditional appeal process that includes all claims from all RO's. (You can't go back after Form 9-traditional and request a DRO, just before the traditional)

I would not rely on your VSO to submit in a timely manner. File your NOD personally so you KNOW that it is in. The VSO should have been on top of this before this. Sounds like he is very busy and your claim could slip through his notice.

Something else to think about....

Have you requested a copy of your C-File? It might pay for you to see what is actually in it and what has been received and/or done. I did this for my hubby when filing a NOD and it really helped to instruct me in the areas that needed to be addressed/corrected in their evaluations.

just possibilities.

fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justriuk,

Something to think about....

When you file a NOD, you can request a Decision Review Officer to review your case. You don't need to file Form 9 at this time. By using a DRO it keeps the review process within your RO and thus maybe have less of a wait for review.

If you don't like the decision of a DRO, you can then file a Form 9 to put your claim into the traditional appeal process that includes all claims from all RO's. (You can't go back after Form 9-traditional and request a DRO, just before the traditional)

I would not rely on your VSO to submit in a timely manner. File your NOD personally so you KNOW that it is in. The VSO should have been on top of this before this. Sounds like he is very busy and your claim could slip through his notice.

Something else to think about....

Have you requested a copy of your C-File? It might pay for you to see what is actually in it and what has been received and/or done. I did this for my hubby when filing a NOD and it really helped to instruct me in the areas that needed to be addressed/corrected in their evaluations.

just possibilities.

fanaticbooks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you do this, do you have to worry about the 1 year you have to appeal, or is this included as you didn't like the DRO decision and its just another step in the appeal process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You better hurry up and check your dates on everything! You must not be late with any of the information/forms/appeals/NOD/DeNovo's...not anything!! Check them all as it seems you are on the Merry-Go-Round now. We want you to win, so get off and work hard on your own claim. Your VSO has too many vets to deal with, and someone's might not be timely, DON'T LET IT BE YOURS !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to all - really need your support this week (bad week health-wise on top of the stress of this claim). My question is: I plan to file the NOD for DRO review (thanks to your advise). Do I use a specific form? I've only had to do this via faxed document to my VSO, so I'm not quite sure here. Then, when I've filed the document, am I still limited to the one-year-from-notification date to file the appeal? If so, I'd end up with both in the works at the same time. Please help me clear this up (I have no doubt you all will). I'm taking Monday off to deal with this in person, and need to get it right.

THANKS TO ALL!!!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Just file the NOD, not the Form 9. If you file Form 9 you are sending it into the Traditional appeal system and bypassing the DRO. That can wait until after the DRO has seen your claim and made its SOC.

There is a form you can use to file the NOD (can't remember the number) BUT you can just write a letter also.

Mention in the letter:

1. Your Name/Address

2. Your Claim Number/SS number

3. Subject: Notice of Disagreement

4. Mention All decisions with which you disagree. Take from the VA decision letter.

5. Mention you would like a Decision Review Officer to conduct a deNovo review of the prior decision.

6. Sign it

7. Make a copy

8. Deliver it and get a date stamp receipt or send Certified, Return Receipt.

You then have time to gather additional evidence or make your case and submit it later. You do not have to submit it with the NOD.

To help you understand what process you are starting, here is a link to a topic I created on the VBN website. It covers

DRO Review Process, De Novo Review, Hearings, Informal Conference Procedures, Notice of Disagreement

DRO Review Process, De Novo Review, Hearings, Informal Conference Procedures, Notice of Disagreement in C&P - Compensation & Pension Exams and Appeals. Forum

I wish you good journey

fanaticbooks

Edited by fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use