Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Smc You Have To Ask?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Ok all, I need a good head slapping! I know better, but STILL I had to call the 800# (duh). Philip, I sooooooooo feel your pain! Here we go....

When I have called, they would tell me that I am 90% combined. I've been 100%TDIU P&T since 1993 (granted P&T in 2008, dated back to 93, according to the 800#). Today, when I questioned why I am being shown as 90% combined, instead of 100% plus the additional disabilities, I was told that I am not 100%, I'm 90% combined. I questioned the TDIU, and it was agreed I was 100% TDIU, so I asked why the other disabilities weren't considered for SMC. I was told because I didn't have a 100% rating! I was then told that the 100% TDIU was a SEPARATE rating, and that in addition to the 100% TDIU, I have a combined rating of 90%! UGH!! When I questioned WHY I did not receive, or was even informed eligibility to SMC was possible, I was informed that I had to ASK for it! I questioned that the 70% that was used for the 100% TDIU, and was informed (a number of times in the conversation), I was told that the TDIU is another rating, separated from the 70% (for which it was based). My ratings, as of 1997, are 10%+10% bilateral, 70% (used for TDIU), 20%, 10%, 10%, 10%, 0%. Erroneously combining (as the VA has been doing), would give me the 100% TDIU (based on single disability of 70%) with an additional 54%. The correct rating should be (according to 38 USC 3.350, 38 USC 1114) 100% plus an additional 70%. Yes, the additional disabilities are separate and distinct. So, the 800# insists that I HAD to ask for the SMC, that it is not the responsibility of the rater to either notify you, or to address the issue UNLESS you ask for it! How do you ask for something you have no idea exists? Back in 1993, 1997, I had no idea that you could be eligible for something called SMC?

The 800# had a difficult time understanding that my present claim is for Aid and Attendance, telling me that is for pension. He informed me that my claim, that is pending, could rate me at the housebound rate (SMC s) for the A&A,. Housebound rate is A&A? My 1993 rating, should have been housebound, considering the letter I sent (and the reason I was granted TDIU) back in 1993, stated that I was housebound, could only leave the home with assistance (when I was able to leave the house). I do believe, that would have been considered an inferred claim (correct me if I'm wrong), an unadjudicated claim.

So, who will be the first to offer the well deserved head slapping?! Philip, I'm right there with you brother!!!!!

Edited by WAC-Vet75

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

"was even informed eligibility to SMC was possible, I was informed that I had to ASK for it!"

This is VA Bull Sh-t plain and simple and one tactic VA tried to pull on me for my SMC CUE claim.

I responded to that same statement that the fact remains the VA caused my husband's untimely death (documented FTCA/1151)

and therefore he could not ask for SMC as he didnt live long enough (due to VA health care) to even see his award for 100% P & T PTSD in his lifetime and also he expired before his 1151 claim became my claim,as a re-open , and I proved what he said in his 1151 claim- that the VA would cause his death.

My still unacknowledged legal evidence includes BVA decisions and 2 OGC Pres ops that prove 1151 disabilities can warrant SMC.

These disabilities however all became direct SC ones last year by BVA award so they still have to consider SMC for accrued purposes now under Nehmer.

I also reminded VA that 38 USC 1114 does not require any veteran to have to ask for SMC.

This benefit is a statuatory Mandate that- whenever the evidence warrants SMC should be considered- they will consider it.

Bradley V Peake expanded the definition of 100% to include TDIU for SMC purposes.

"My 1993 rating, should have been housebound, considering the letter I sent (and the reason I was granted TDIU) back in 1993, stated that I was housebound, could only leave the home with assistance (when I was able to leave the house). I do believe, that would have been considered an inferred claim (correct me if I'm wrong), an unadjudicated claim."

Do you have the award letter? I think you should file a CUE on that decision if the established medical evidence they had at that time warranted a HB award.

That bears repeating- if the VA had established medical evidence that indicated HB or A & A was warranted and they did NOT consider SMC at all, that is a CUE.

For example my husband could not drive and the VA van had to pick him up for VA Day Treatment.He needed Day treatment as he could not be left alone and I had a farm to run.There were other reasons too - not for this discussion.

That alone should have triggered them to consider the SMC HB or A & A award.They also overlooked completely the "S" award for 100% plus 60 % or more.

A & A is often misunderstood. The criteria is here at hadit.

A veteran does not have to fit into every part of the criteria.

But they need evidence of what parts they fit into. Spousal statements can also be considered for A & A awards.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, I really think I should get a swift kick for even calling the 800#, as I KNOW better!!!

I can only find the last page of my 100% TDIU from 1993 (I went through that, "I'm tired of this sh*t" stage, and unfortunately trashed a few things I shouldn't have many years ago). The last page does state, "In reaching this decision we considered the following evidence: your outpatient treatment records from the VA medical center in Martinsburg from January 7, 1992 to May 22, 1993: the hospital summary from April 26, 1993 to April 27, 1993; the VA examination from June 24, 1993 to June 29, 1993: the VA Form 21-8940 dated May 4, 1993; VA Form 21-4192 dated July 15, 1993 and July 19, 1993." I am in possession of a copy of the letter, dated 6 Aug 93, sent to the Adjudication Officer, himself (mentioned in first post here). On the last page that I have, it shows enclosures(s) VA Form 4107, so I am assuming this actually is the last page of the decision. I need to get a copy of my C file, but want to wait until after my other two issues are adjudicated.

It's also funny that they call one of my disabilities a "stomach condition", when in reality, I was diagnosed with a gastric ulcer, esophagitis, and reflux within 3 months of military discharge. Not once have they rated the GERD (another CUE in the works). In 2009, I was given another endoscopy, and was told I had a hiatus hernia (apparently it's a slipping one and hence was never noticed before?). During my hospitalization in 76, they even made me part of a study for a new drug for GERD......

Sorry, I digress..... The A&A is presently being adjudicated. Though the Doctor listed that eyesight was 5/200 each, I am not service connected for my eyes, and figure they will disallow that portion. I have MS, and have great difficulty performing certain tasks, many times I am totally unable to perform certain tasks. I had paid someone, for a year, to assist me, but now my daughter has taken over as my caregiver. She has to wash my hair, helps me dress (damn buttons have gotten tricky over the years), prepares meals, I even go through periods that I can not turn a damn door knob (I'm planning on getting them all replaced with levers!). I informed the C&P Doctor of my difficulties, and his report noted it. That's also when I read that horrible word referenced to me...."frail"!

So, don't you agree that I need a slap in the head for calling the 800#?!

Edited by WAC-Vet75

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are able go to the VARO and look over your C File. Anything you need a copy of they will usually make on the spot for you. After all they are your records

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA is "supposed" to consider any additional ratings/SMC without the claimant having to ask. But, as we all know, sadly, it usually doesn't happen, so it's up to the claimant to be proactive, in their claims process. "K," I think they owe you some sizable retro payments.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not once have they rated the GERD (another CUE in the works).

So, don't you agree that I need a slap in the head for calling the 800#?!

WAC-Vet75,

An issue that has never been rated (adjudicated) does not meet the CUE criteria.

A CUE is filed on a unappealed claim that has become final.

Yes - you need to be slapped for the rest of this entire day :-)

post-60-0-93226800-1300194667_thumb.jpg

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use