Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Who Hires/fires/oversees C&p Examiners

Rate this question


fanaticbooks

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is just pure curiosity....

I have read in here about a lot of incompetent C&P examiners. One of my hubby's was also not exactly on the mark (which I mentioned in his NOD info).

How are these people hired, evaluated for the position, and investigated/overseen on the job proficiency?

Do the raters inform anyone when multiple C&Ps come in that are badly done by that person?

Who does someone complain to about an examiner to try to change that incompetence.

As I said, I am just curious about this. Don't know if there is an answer, but thought I would ask. :)

fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Beoieve it or not C and P exam personnel as well as clerical staff work for the VBA. They work at the VA but for the VBA.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If I get a bad C&P I just go get some more evidence to refute it. Why argue with them when your best bet is to just outgun them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John999

Excellent position...this is the last bastion of the old regime, the flawed and adversarial C&P examiner, there is no regulation in Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 3, 4, or 17 in regard to attitude of the C&P examiner, although there should be. In my opinion such a regulation should be equal to, or more decriptive as 38 C.F.R. 4.23. Those examinations which are hostile to the veteran should be considered inadequate for rating purposes, and returned for a proper examination by a different examiner. The original examiner should be counseled, and practices be monotored to ensure HE or SHE remembers why they are there, and that the majority of claimant are honest veterans who are seeking benefits to which they feel they are entitled...that the reviewing examiner in any instance should not allow their feelings to intrude on either the objective findings or the etiology of the condition where a nexus opinion is requested.

Ne Desit Virtus-Let Valor Not Fail

"These fallen we verify, these fallen we venerate, until at last we form again".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

As a result of a really bad report written by a C&P examiner I researched this to great extent. Numerous service officers advised me to file complaints against C&P examiners with the director of the hospital that ordered the exam. The examiners work for or are contracted by the hospital.

I did find a department in the VA that took responsibility for reviewing C&P examiners. They claimed that their reviews were done randomly and that they did not react to complaints. However, about six months ago they were thinking about a trail program to use complaints from veterans as a requisite for reviewing an examiner. At that time they had developed a form for the veteran to fill out. However, the form had not yet passed an approval process. I will try to find the name of this organization and post it later.

There was a veteran who posted on hadit about five years ago that he complained to the director of the hospital and that they got him a new C&P.

A medical opinion based on

speculation, without supporting clinical data or other

rationale, does not provide the required degree of medical

certainty. Bloom v. West, 12 Vet. App. 185, 187 (1999).

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The URL below is for the C&P exam program. I pasted a couple paragraphs from their website. The veterans satisfaction survey form # I was talking about is VA Form 10-0480.

In the past I have shown up to C&P exams to find out my primary care doctor was doing the exam. I have had C&P's performed by department heads. I know a VA staff treating clinician who wrote a report for me and stated in the report that she has performed C&P exams when requested by the hospiltal administration.

http://www.va.gov/CBO/cbo/cpep.asp

Compensation & Pension Exam Program

CPEP is a joint national office of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) whose mission is to promote continuous quality improvement of the Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination process, which lies at the heart of VA's disability benefit programs for Veterans. This process begins when the VBA Regional Office (RO) determines that additional medical information is needed to resolve a Veteran's claim for benefits. It concludes when the exam facility prepares and releases the disability exam report to the RO.

Quality Measurement. CPEP reviews the quality of exam requests and exam reports of targeted C&P exam types. These Quality reviews are conducted and reported monthly. CPEP's quality indicators are designed to highlight specific quality factors, which allow concentration of quality improvement efforts where they are needed. Plans are in progress to increase the number of exam types subject to quality review.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use