Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Court Blasts Va Mental Health Care

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks boomer2,

My hubby mentioned it was on the news but I wasn't able to watch. Glad to read what it is about. I will check to see if VBN has this posted. If not will give them the article.

Appreciate your finding of this because I had intended to look myself. Now I don't have to do so. :)

fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YOU BET!

Accusing Congress and the president of neglecting to take appropriate action to save veterans' lives, a federal appeals court called for drastic improvements to the Department of Veterans' Affairs mental health care system.

The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, in a 104-page decision issued on Tuesday, cited the failure of the political branches to address what it called the VA's "egregious problems" and "unchecked incompetence" in delivering mental health services to veterans.

That failure, the three-judge panel held, violated the veterans' due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/10/us-veterans-mental-health-idUSTRE7497KP20110510?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

This is a class action suit filed by Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans United for Truth.

The US Court of Appeals decision is here:

http://www.vawatchdogtoday.org/uploads/2011-05-10_9th_Circuit_decision.pdf

more info at

http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta

Thanks for posting the actual decision. I am sending this to my congressman and senator. I recommend that everyone else do the same. WE need to get their attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

VA's "egregious problems" and "unchecked incompetence" in delivering mental health services to veterans

Can't get any more clear than that

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Why are not DAV, VFW and AL marching on Washington in protest? I understand this was VCS that got this going. They are claiming it anyway. It is a scandal and where are out million man VSO's in all this? They are worried about Tricare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes-VCS Veterans for Common Sense (Paul Sullivan), Veterans United for Truth , and an entire class of adversely affected veterans were the Plaintiffs.

This lawsuit has had quite an ordeal and has been WON!

“The United States Constitution confers upon veterans and their surviving relatives a right to the effective provision of mental health care and to the just and timely adjudication of their claims for health care and service-connected death and disability,” Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote for the majority. “

I wonder what the VA is going to do about this decision.

I also wonder how many veterans might be able to use this decision to warrant an earlier entitlement date for their PTSD if the diagnosis and treatment of it was delayed!

Between this decision and the Freeman decision, the VA is getting shoved down their throats that veterans have Constitutional Rights !!!!!---and the very system that has been created due to their service and sacrifice-

has crapped on veterans over and over again and this suit is bound to put a stop to some of that.

I dont think,since the defeated San Francisco case about 2 years ago regarding the same issue - that the DAV, AL, VFW etc etc ever thought this case would fly.

They treated it like a claim-if they don't believe in a vet's claim, they don't support it.

Gordon Espamner one of the finest Vets attorneys around- made front page at the LA times on this case.

http://www.latimes.com/health/la-me-0511-veterans-ptsd-20110511,0,1731423.story

I have not had time to fully read over this important decision.The language of the court was VERY strong and VA has not responded publicly yet to this.

My concern is what will this really mean for veterans with MH issues and how can this decision affect the claims process?

How will this impact on the families of veterans who committed suicide while waiting for VA health care?

Will this decision cause more FTCA and 1151 claims to be filed?

Could this support a better EED for some SC MH veterans who can prove their diagnosis and treatment was delayed?

Maybe we should start sending the VA the US Constitution as evidence in support of our claims!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use