Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

House Committee On Vet Affairs Webcast


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Listened to the June 2 House hearing. The VA reps admitted to problems (how could they not!) But failed to really address the causes and possible solutions.

When all is said and done, the VSO reps really pointed out some of the major issues and discussed possible remedies.

The VA seemed to propose grandiose schemes and patches, rather than any real solutions.

What was not said in so many words - -The problems are ultimately a result of the morass of laws and regulations, with a VA attitude that the veterans are trying to "game the system".

Production and quality were discussed. It was mentioned that the VA had a high error rate, and that the accounting for such things was not what it should be.

It was not mentioned that the VA has had a high error rate and poor production for many decades, regardless of the number of claims.

A really good one was a reps pointing out that the VA fails to give "combat" veterans the evidence relaxation that the law requires.

(I have had personal experience with that problem!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listened to the June 2 House hearing. The VA reps admitted to problems (how could they not!) But failed to really address the causes and possible solutions.

When all is said and done, the VSO reps really pointed out some of the major issues and discussed possible remedies.

The VA seemed to propose grandiose schemes and patches, rather than any real solutions.

What was not said in so many words - -The problems are ultimately a result of the morass of laws and regulations, with a VA attitude that the veterans are trying to "game the system".

Production and quality were discussed. It was mentioned that the VA had a high error rate, and that the accounting for such things was not what it should be.

It was not mentioned that the VA has had a high error rate and poor production for many decades, regardless of the number of claims.

A really good one was a reps pointing out that the VA fails to give "combat" veterans the evidence relaxation that the law requires.

(I have had personal experience with that problem!)

Very good video, highly recommend everyone to watch this. The part about the 8oo# using scripting, 3 minutes to get the VET of the phone(elderly 80 year old calling in for status) , inadequate computer systems,ect,ect. I work in a call center-all call centers have stats. Talk time, how long you are on the call with the customer vs what is the standard. Low and behold if you have high stats.

Also the part about the few below standard sites with the most errors.

And of course the VA refusing to allow outside medical reports as a substitute for Compensation exams as Congress hasn't change the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

According to VA thinking the only vet who is not gaming the system is a dead vet. Then they accuse the survivor of trying to game the system. A vet in a nursing home is taking too long to die and is very inconsiderate of the tax payers. You have the medical side and you have the bean counters on both the medical side and the benefit side. They have the final say most of the time. Active military is both a asset and a liability. Vets are a liability on the

government books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If anyone is gaming the system its the damn VA.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Pete

I bet for every vet who is correctly compensated there are ten vets who get nothing. For every 100% SC vet there are ten vets who get by on a pension or SSD or who are homeless. Has the VA ever sent out a letter to all vets saying something like "You may be entitled to VA compensation and other benefits. Contact your local VA hospital or regional office to find out"? Hell, no, they don't. To me not communicating the benefits due to vets is gaming the the vet population. Almost every veteran has a benefit be it a VA mortgage or medical care that they could use, but I don't see the VA doing outreach. They do outreach to certain small populations such as suicidal vets, but that is just because of bad publicity when a vet kills themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use