Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Re-Consideration Claim Not Decided Within 1 Year

Rate this question


COOL BREEZE

Question

Deleted

Edited by COOL BREEZE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It appears that the odds of having a re-consideration claim decided within 1 year are slim to none. With that said, what should a Veteran do?. I have a claim already for a NOD with several claims. Now if this current re-consideration is not decided by October it has been discussed here that a NOD must be done. By doing so will this void the reconsideration claim by upgrading to a NOD, and if so will they merge it with the other NOD? This was a simple CUE claim(by notes in the C-file). And how should this new upgraded NOD to be worded in such a manner that it won't take several years. A re-consideration claim was supposed to be the quickest claim to file when it has been shown that certain medical evidence was with held that would have rated a higher claim. I have 4 months left before the 1 year mark-need to start preparing another NOD.

Thanks for any input!

CB,

You will only confuse yourself and new members with this terminology

your tossing around.

There is no such process as upgrading a request for reconsideration to a NOD.

A claimant either files or does not file,a timely NOD.

A request for reconsideration and a NOD are two completely separate things.

A RforR has additional evidence submitted with it.

A NOD doesn't need to have anything additional submitted with it.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in Phoenix, and I have no idea why claim detertimation is SO SLOW. I have at least five claims in since August/September of last year. All is done.........exam, evidence, etc. There is just no more action on them. All they tell me is that they are awaiting decision and final determination that they can be rated. I have one or two of the vets are in hurt city but like I said they just will not issue a determination. There is just nothing you can do and I am sure they hate me calling EVERY week. ?????????

bobbyq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cool

I think you should file a NOD. You are banking on what the 800# people told you. You have a effective date to lose. We have been over the reconsideration vs NOD argument and time clock many times here at Hadit. If you file a NOD I think the VA will just go ahead and finish your reconsideration, but you will cover your ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

NOD on a Form 9 is required to be filed within 1 year of denial. No Form 9 than your claim is dead.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a link that may help this resolve this:

http://www.veteransr...de-part-ii.html

"Reopened claims and NOD's are not worked by the same people nor by the same administrative procedures. If one requests a "reconsideration" with the one year appeals period and then file a NOD before the one year elapses because VA hasn't made a decision on the "new" evidence, then one is asking that VA go through all the administrative procedures for a "reopened" claim up to and including a review by a Rating Specialist and then if the claim cannot be granted to just stop without a formal decision and send it back out to start reprocessing as an NOD. This would create an Administrative nightmare and simply cannot be done. If after requesting a "re-opening" of the claim you then file an NOD, the "re-opened" claim is no longer valid and whatever evidence you submitted with it will be considered as part of the NOD. As soon as the NOD is received on that particular issue, whatever it is, it MUST be worked under the appeal procedures. One cannot have both a reopened claim and an NOD on the same issue at the same time. In short, one must keep an eye on the expiration date for the appeal period so you could convert the "reopened" claim to a Notice of Disagreement (NOD) in the event a decision was not rendered before the appeal period expired. If you disagree with the decision and you aren't 100% certain that the new evidence will result in a grant, you cannot let that original appeal period run out. If the reopened claim is not granted and you don't submit an NOD within the appeal period for the first decision, you have lost the date of claim on that decision as a potential effective date. There are a limited number of situations where one should "re-open" the claim instead of filing an NOD, but these are few and far between and one must really, really know what they're doing when they make the decision to do this. The overwhelming majority of cases a Notice of Disagreement is the best path to take."

Can someone please put this in an easier way to understand. I am not sure if I correctly posted this-I put a link-and the part that I would like to understand in the part above-thanks-. This doesn't say you you need to to this-just says if you do it.

"

Edited by COOL BREEZE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a link that may help this resolve this:

http://www.veteransr...de-part-ii.html

"Reopened claims and NOD's are not worked by the same people nor by the same administrative procedures. If one requests a "reconsideration" with the one year appeals period and then file a NOD before the one year elapses because VA hasn't made a decision on the "new" evidence, then one is asking that VA go through all the administrative procedures for a "reopened" claim up to and including a review by a Rating Specialist and then if the claim cannot be granted to just stop without a formal decision and send it back out to start reprocessing as an NOD. This would create an Administrative nightmare and simply cannot be done. If after requesting a "re-opening" of the claim you then file an NOD, the "re-opened" claim is no longer valid and whatever evidence you submitted with it will be considered as part of the NOD. As soon as the NOD is received on that particular issue, whatever it is, it MUST be worked under the appeal procedures. One cannot have both a reopened claim and an NOD on the same issue at the same time. In short, one must keep an eye on the expiration date for the appeal period so you could convert the "reopened" claim to a Notice of Disagreement (NOD) in the event a decision was not rendered before the appeal period expired. If you disagree with the decision and you aren't 100% certain that the new evidence will result in a grant, you cannot let that original appeal period run out. If the reopened claim is not granted and you don't submit an NOD within the appeal period for the first decision, you have lost the date of claim on that decision as a potential effective date. There are a limited number of situations where one should "re-open" the claim instead of filing an NOD, but these are few and far between and one must really, really know what they're doing when they make the decision to do this. The overwhelming majority of cases a Notice of Disagreement is the best path to take."

Can someone please put this in an easier way to understand. I am not sure if I correctly posted this-I put a link-and the part that I would like to understand in the part above-thanks-. This doesn't say you you need to to this-just says if you do it.

"

CB,

Now you're talking about 3 different processes.

1) Request for Reconsideration

2) NOD

3) Re-open

If you haven't received an answer on your Request for Reconsideration

by XX/XX/XXXX date then just file your danged NOD on time - quit driving yourself nutty.

Between this and the Monday Morning Workload reports you will go bonkers.

It's all really not as difficult as you are making it become.

Analyzing the heck out of everything - checking ebenefits and calling 1-800

will not provide you accurate answers or make the adjudication process go any faster

for you.

Get a hobby.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use