Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Spinal Cord Stimulator

Rate this question


cooter

Question

My Pain Dr is suggesting I try out a Spinal Cord Stimulator. The trial would be an external device to see if it will work for me, and if it does, they'll surgically implant the device. Sort of like a pacemaker. Anyone here experienced this device before, and your thoughts.

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As far as the effectiveness of the device, I have had about 90% reduction of pain in my neck and lower back. I took tramadol since 2010 on a daily basis and have stopped altogether. The stimulator and an occasional NSAID are all that is needed to make it through.

That being said, it is for symptom/pain remediation and IS NOT A FIX! Don't go out and try to lift like before any injuries.

I do recommend it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have 60% disability for my prostate and bladder and urinary problems.  they are going to put a MEDTRONIC stimulator  On my spine.  I cath my self seven more time today and I change pads 6 to 7 times. The stimulator is supposed to help me from having to leak so much and reduce me changing pads. The most for the disability is 60%   Is there an increase or separate disability secondary for the implant I can get The stimulator is supposed to help me from having to leak so much and reduce me changing pads. The most for the disability is 60% is there an increase of a separate disability secondary for the implant neural stimulator neurostimulator. 

Edited by ywrw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

YOU Need to ask the surgeon that is going to implant this devise as to the stimulations on the pain areas  if the leads are going to be long enough to reach your pain area?

  because I don't think the leads  will reach from upper back to lower back, this is a good device if you just have pain in one or the other parts of your Back  either upper back or lower back not good...if its in-between  this might help  but as for as any pain in the upper as well in the lower parts of your Back  you will only receive the stimulation where the leads will be long enough   to stimulate the nerves ,this is something to need to bring up to the surgeon.

They may place the leads on your pain area and you wear the device on your hip  belt loops  ect,,ect,, before the implant takes place,  because if it don't work you sure don't need to go through with this device implanted in your back, they will place it on your back and ask you to lay down to see if its in the way with the position you sleep in.  ect,,ect,, temporary.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

ywrw I'm not saying you should be inventing disabilities; that would be fraud. But, if I were you, I am absolutely positive that your current disablity, would be affecting mentally. Anxiety, depression, etc. If I were you I would look up MH symptoms for those,at minimum, and see if you have any. If so, get a through exam from a specialist and diagnosis and a IMO/dbq that supports the new disability. If your symptoms are affecting you in normal social and working activities, you may have some MH issues. Example, leakage prevents you from working/employment. Don't socialize because your embarrassed you may have an accident. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use