Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Peripheral Neuropathy Question

Rate this question


JeffSoCal

Question

I'm currently 90% SC and have a claim in for increase since Dec 2010. Most of my issues for increase are for spine, and associated problems that come with that i.e. radiculopathy both legs, suspected peripheral neuroathy, DDD, scoliosis etc. I have read some of the AO cases that have posted on some of the boards on Hadit and there seems to be evidence that Peripheral Neuropathy can occur after more than one year. I served in VietNam two tours 1968 and 1970. When I filed for my increase

I filed for peripheral neuropathy because it can be from my spine condition. Should I have mentioned that it's possible it could be from exposure to AO in Vietnam?

Since I'm still in developmental stage should I contact my Rep DAV and ask them. I figure if I don't mention the VietNam stuff the rating board won't consider it when

considering the claim for PN. Anythoughts would be appreciated. Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

PN on a direct basis has to be acute or subacute and within a year from separation. Otherwise PN should be looked at as a seconday I.e. Secondary to dm or some other condition.

g.  Definition:  Acute and Subacute Peripheral Neuropathy

Acute peripheral neuropathy and subacute peripheral neuropathy are transient peripheral neuropathies that

 

• appeared within one year of last exposure to an herbicide agent

• resolved within two years of the date of onset, and

• do not include chronic peripheral neuropathy.  

38 CFR 3.309(e)

 

(e) Disease associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents. If a veteran was exposed to an herbicide agent during active military, naval, or air service, the following diseases shall be service-connected if the requirements of §3.307(a)(6) are met even though there is no record of such disease during service, provided further that the rebuttable presumption provisions of §3.307(d) are also satisfied.

 

AL amyloidosis

​Chloracne or other acneform disease consistent with chloracne

​Type 2 diabetes (also known as Type II diabetes mellitus or adult-onset diabetes)

​Hodgkin’s disease

Ischemic heart disease (including, but not limited to, acute, subacute, and old myocardial infarction; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease (including coronary spasm) and coronary bypass surgery; and stable, unstable and Prinzmetal’s angina)

All chronic B-cell leukemias (including, but not limited to, hairy-cell leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia)​

Multiple myeloma

​Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

​Parkinson’s disease

​Acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy

​Porphyria cutanea tarda

​Prostate cancer

​Respiratory cancers (cancer of the lung, bronchus, larynx, or trachea)

Soft-tissue sarcoma (other than osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma, or mesothelioma)

 

Note 1: The term soft-tissue sarcoma includes the following:

 

​Adult fibrosarcoma

​Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

​Malignant fibrous histiocytoma

​Liposarcoma

​Leiomyosarcoma

​Epithelioid leiomyosarcoma (malignant leiomyoblastoma)

​Rhabdomyosarcoma

​Ectomesenchymoma

​Angiosarcoma (hemangiosarcoma and lymphangiosarcoma)

​Proliferating (systemic) angioendotheliomatosis

​Malignant glomus tumor

​Malignant hemangiopericytoma

​Synovial sarcoma (malignant synovioma)

​Malignant giant cell tumor of tendon sheath

Malignant schwannoma, including malignant schwannoma with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation (malignant Triton tumor), glandular and epithelioid ​malignant schwannomas

​Malignant mesenchymoma

​Malignant granular cell tumor

​Alveolar soft part sarcoma

​Epithelioid sarcoma

​Clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses

​Extraskeletal Ewing’s sarcoma

​Congenital and infantile fibrosarcoma

​Malignant ganglioneuroma

 

Note 2: For purposes of this section, the term acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy means transient peripheral neuropathy that appears within weeks or months of exposure to an herbicide agent and resolves within two years of the date of onset.  

 

Note 3: For purposes of this section, the term ischemic heart disease does not include hypertension or peripheral manifestations of arteriosclerosis such as peripheral vascular disease or stroke, or any other condition that does not qualify within the generally accepted medical definition of Ischemic heart disease.

Edited by T8r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having been service connected @ 90%....to get to 100% with individual diseases you will have to be another 50% service connected...(VA Math) if you are not working, file for unemployability...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Regarding the Vietnam AO thing unless you have DMII I don't think that will help with PN compensation. Under existing rules it is almost impossible to get compensated for PN direct SC to AO. How are your glucose levels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by some remote chance, you ever, ever become service-connected for neuropathy presumptive to AO, I'm not sure that you would receive any additional financial benefit from it.

In an earlier post, you stated that you already were service connected for RLL and LLL radiculopathy, correct? If so, you would not receive a separate evaluation for lower extremity neuropathy s/p AO exposure because that would be an example of pyramiding (38 CFR 4.14 http://www.benefits....PART4/S4_14.DOC .)

I'm currently 90% SC and have a claim in for increase since Dec 2010. Most of my issues for increase are for spine, and associated problems that come with that i.e. radiculopathy both legs, suspected peripheral neuroathy, DDD, scoliosis etc. I have read some of the AO cases that have posted on some of the boards on Hadit and there seems to be evidence that Peripheral Neuropathy can occur after more than one year. I served in VietNam two tours 1968 and 1970. When I filed for my increase

I filed for peripheral neuropathy because it can be from my spine condition. Should I have mentioned that it's possible it could be from exposure to AO in Vietnam?

Since I'm still in developmental stage should I contact my Rep DAV and ask them. I figure if I don't mention the VietNam stuff the rating board won't consider it when

considering the claim for PN. Anythoughts would be appreciated. Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i hoping you are seeing a privite Neuro. You should be at 100 % +. Yes Vietnam should be at the tip of your tongue with any conversation! Don't be like me, when the first doctor you see at VA, and they ask you do you think about Vietnam and how does it effect you. Say Hell yes, I can't watch TV! The War's and the history! I did not say that, and it diid :sad: This Agent Orange is a terrible thing and PN should not be a secondary conditions , If you IHD, or DMII,I hope the best. Mine is getting bad, it takes me and hour to do this text. God Bless

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest terrysturgis

Like Buick said, if you are not working file for TDIU. Also don't forget Social Security Disability. If you can get SSD it is excellent evidence for TDIU. To go from 90% to 100% is difficult at best. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use