Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Spine

Rate this question


Inthewind

Question

Ok, I'm confused. So any advice or comments will be greatly appreciated.

I went for my initial C&P in 2004 for my C-spine and L-spine. I wasn't familiar with the process, and I'm still not. I pre-medicated before the C&P but STILL had very painful ROM and told the Doc that during the exam. I now know better then to take 40mg of Oxycodone before I go this time.

I was rated at 10% for my neck and 0% for lumbar strain and it seems like it was all based on my ROM's. It's like they didn't even consider the x-rays and MRI's, because there's clearly evidence in the findings.

C4-C5 Central disc protrusion indenting the ventral thecal sac causing moderate stenosis of the spinal canal. Central annular tear.

C5-C6 Mild loss of disc height and a diffuse disc bulge indenting the ventral thecal sac causing moderate stenosis of the spinal canal. Bilateral uncovertebral hypertrophy leading to moderate right and mild left neural foriminal stenosis. Central annular tear.

C6-C7 Disc bulge indenting the ventral thecal sac.

T3-T4 Small central disc protrusion indenting the ventral thecal sac causing moderate stenosis.

L3-L4 No significant disc bulge. Mild facet hypertrophy is seen.

L4-L5 Mild disc bulge is seen with bilateral facet hypertrophy and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy resulting in mild spinal canal stenosis and moderate bilateral foraminal stenosis.

L5-S1 Disc bulge is seen along with bilateral facet hypertrophy. This results in moderate bilateral foraminal stenosis.

I currently have a claim in for increase. I should have appealed when I got the rating but due to the disarray of my life it wasn't important at the time.

I'm in constant pain, regardless of any movement at all. I've been on pain management, epidural steriod injections and narcotics since 2002. My fear is that I'll go into another C&P and do the same thing. I can move because I'm not fused but it's EXTREMELY painful. Am I supposed to move only to the point of pain? If thats the case I wouldn't move PERIOD!

Any advice is welcomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Range of motion of the neck for 1 segment and the back for the other segment. This is 2 rateable issues. I would have to see your award letter to advise you.

The regs state ROM regardless of pain. That sucks.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Range of motion of the neck for 1 segment and the back for the other segment. This is 2 rateable issues. I would have to see your award letter to advise you.

The regs state ROM regardless of pain. That sucks.

J

the way the va determines ratings for the spine is criminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1323913023' post=265926]

Range of motion of the neck for 1 segment and the back for the other segment. This is 2 rateable issues. I would have to see your award letter to advise you.

The regs state ROM regardless of pain. That sucks.

J

I'll scan it and stick it up in here. I seriously need some help. Does anyone know where to find some IMO verbiage examples??

Thanks brothers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

inthewind, Am I supposed to move only to the point of pain? Yes this where you stop, I had an exam i told the dr i couldnt bend backward,or side to side,

just forward flexion to 10 degrees my service officer says you should ask for a new c&p because va wont accept this, i told her i could not bend because

of the pain I have & dont ask for another c&p. I got 40%, they mostly look at forward flexion for your rating. jmho

Edited by tmoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use