Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dh Got Notice Of Ptsd Comp & Pen Appt - Worried Sick!

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

Okay, not worried sick just yet, but I don't think he's slept at all since he got the letter Saturday. I'm the one who's sick over it (I have IBS and it's been extra wicked :P )

I'm not sure if this is in the right forum, maybe it should be in PTSD?

I'm worried because when I filed my claim for PTSD, I wrote a long, very detailed stressor letter. I just sat down one night and poured it all out, just me and the computer. (I still haven't told my therapist most of the things...) And I got a letter from a family member and my ex-husband.

But my husband hasn't done that. He submitted his 4138 and the 761 (the special one for PTSD) through a VA representative and a VSO. None of the stuff he's submitted has much detail, just that he was in an accident, badly injured and burned, long time recovering and a few other sentences about the pain of the recovery and his isolation and nightmares and flashbacks now.

His MH records show a lot of detail, and his psychiatrist even wrote in her notes that his PTSD stems from the accident he had while in the service (great nexus, if they read it!!).

I feel like throwing up. One of the big worries is that my darling has rages. He doesn't have a short fuse, exactly, but he will very suddenly be overwhelmed by rage, even when you can't readily see what sparked it. Most of the time he's able to suppress it, or he leaves the area and goes for a long walk. He's lucky he can do that at work, and his supervisor is understanding (though I think they're praying for the day he retires).

He's afraid about the C & P interview because he's afraid the examiner will ask something or say something and he will go off. Being able to escape is core to his sense of safety, and he's afraid he'll blow up at the examiner or will burst out of the room and escape.

I'm worried about that too.

Sorry if I'm not being very coherent. I'm tired and kerfutzeled.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

He submitted his 4138 and the 761 (the special one for PTSD) through a VA representative and a VSO.

None of the stuff he's submitted has much detail,

just that he was in an accident, badly injured and burned, long time recovering and a few other sentences about the pain of the recovery and his isolation and nightmares and flashbacks now.

His MH records show a lot of detail, and his psychiatrist even wrote in her notes that his PTSD stems from the accident he had while in the service (great nexus, if they read it!!).

He's afraid about the C & P interview because he's afraid the examiner will ask something or say something and he will go off.

he's afraid he'll blow up at the examiner or will burst out of the room and escape.

I'm worried about that too.

hedgey,

Sit your DH down at the computer and have him read this.

DH - your child hood was average and OK - no problems.

You went into the military - a horrible event happend - you were burned - long recovery, etc...

you might even still experience pain and discomfort as a residual effect of the injuries.

Your psychiatrist has stated - you have a diagnosis of PTSD and related this to be a result

of the accident (stressor event) on active duty.

It is important that the C&P examiner pretty much come to this same conclusion (so they will most

likely try to find out through your records and talking to you) in regards to diagnosis of PTSD

and it's nexus.

Diagnostic criteria for PTSD include a history of exposure to a traumatic event meeting two criteria and symptoms from each of three symptom clusters: intrusive recollections, avoidant/numbing symptoms, and hyper-arousal symptoms. A fifth criterion concerns duration of symptoms and a sixth assesses functioning.

* * * Below is the criteria they consider for an actual DIAGNOSIS of PTSD

Criterion A: stressor

The person has been exposed to a traumatic event in which both of the following have been present:

  • The person has experienced, witnessed, or been confronted with an event or events that involve actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of oneself or others.
  • The person's response involved intense fear,helplessness, or horror. Note: in children, it may be expressed instead by disorganized or agitated behavior.

    Criterion B: intrusive recollection


    The traumatic event is persistently re-experienced in at least one of the following ways:

    • Recurrent and intrusive distressing recollections of the event, including images, thoughts, or perceptions. Note: in young children, repetitive play may occur in which themes or aspects of the trauma are expressed.
    • Recurrent distressing dreams of the event. Note: in children, there may be frightening dreams without recognizable content
    • Acting or feeling as if the traumatic event were recurring (includes a sense of reliving the experience, illusions, hallucinations, and dissociative flashback episodes,including those that occur upon awakening or when intoxicated). Note: in children, trauma-specific reenactment may occur.
    • Intense psychological distress at exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event.
    • Physiologic reactivity upon exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event

      Criterion C: avoidant/numbing


      Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma and numbing of general responsiveness (not present before the trauma), as indicated by at least three of the following:

      • Efforts to avoid thoughts, feelings, or conversations associated with the trauma
      • Efforts to avoid activities, places, or people that arouse recollections of the trauma
      • Inability to recall an important aspect of the trauma
      • Markedly diminished interest or participation in significant activities
      • Feeling of detachment or estrangement from others
      • Restricted range of affect (e.g., unable to have loving feelings)
      • Sense of foreshortened future (e.g., does not expect to have a career, marriage, children, or a normal life span)
      • Criterion D: hyper-arousal

        Persistent symptoms of increasing arousal (not present before the trauma), indicated by at least two of the following:

          [*]Difficulty falling or staying asleep

          [*]Irritability or outbursts of anger

          [*]Difficulty concentrating

          [*]Hyper-vigilance

          [*]Exaggerated startle response

          Criterion E: duration

          Duration of the disturbance (symptoms in B, C, and D) is more than one month.

          Criterion F: functional significance

          The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

          Specify if:

          Acute: if duration of symptoms is less than three months

          Chronic: if duration of symptoms is three months or more

          Specify if:

          With or Without delay onset: Onset of symptoms at least six months after the stressor.

          * * * Below is the VA's criteria for the evaluation of the percentage level to assign once service connection has been

          established.

          General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders: Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name 100

          Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, due to such symptoms as: suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; speech intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant; near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a worklike setting); inability to establish and maintain effective relationships

          70

          Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships

          50

          Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and conversation normal), due to such symptoms as: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, recent events)

          30

          Occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only during periods of significant stress, or; symptoms controlled by continuous medication

          10

          A mental condition has been formally diagnosed, but symptoms are not severe enough either to interfere with occupational and social functioning or to require continuous medication

          0

          You will be OK - ou will not go off on the examiner or storm out of the

          exam - these are just things we feel and things we worry about and it these feelings

          and fears are due to our PTSD.

          Good luck - you will be OK - just stick to how your PTSD and any associated pain effects you.

          JMHO - carlie

          Editing to add :

          BE SURE TO TAKE A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE - to leave with the C&P examiner.

          The examiner doesn't have to allow you to leave it - so just real easy say I brought this TO LEAVE with you

          because I don't think it's in my records yet.

          " His MH records show a lot of detail, and his psychiatrist even wrote in her notes that his PTSD stems from the accident he had while in the service (great nexus, if they read it!!)."

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie, you're the best. DH is taking tomorrow off and I'll have him read this then. He had a therapy session today and came out very tense. He's been prowling the house like a caged puma all evening. If I thought he could settle his mind enough I'd have him read this now, but he's pretty keyed up. The lorazepam doesn't seem to be doing much... He's okay, not bouncing off the walls, but just can't sit still.

I'm pooped, but anxious at the same time. Playing chess on the computer like a robot. I have to get the 180 signed & faxed in the morning.

Carlie, thanks. I think your message to him will really help. It'll inform him, plus he'll see he's not alone in this. I'm here for him, but seeing someone else care enough to write all you did will mean a lot to him. Thank you. cyber huggy thank you.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Good Luck and be happy you are closer to finish line now

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Pete.

I still haven't gotten the poor guy to sit still long enough to read this message. I pull it up, with my laptop on the kitchen table and he keeps jumping up to wash a cup, let the dog out, let the dog in.

He's a wreck. At this rate I'm going to wheeling him into the exam in a shopping cart, gnawing on a chew toy.

I've never seen him this bad. Thankfully he sees the psychiatrist next week, maybe she can prescribe something stronger than lorazepam, or at least let him take a little more of it.

I'm already at my daily limit of 4, just because he's so rattled and I'm feeling so helpless to comfort him.

But I checked his MyhealtheVet account and the appointment is listed, so it's definite.

I called the Release of Information guy at the VAMC to ask best way to get his MH records quickly. See, DH only has on hand up to October last year. The VSO recommends having as current as possible.

The ROI guy said don't worry, the examiner will have all the latest notes right at his fingertips, it'll be all in the computer.

I'm still worried.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hedgey,

Tell him to sit down and read it now - there isn't anything to be wigged out

about - and if he will go ahead and sit down and read it -

he could save me a trip to Buffalo !

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie, I think the only way I'm going to get him to read this is to plop the laptop on his tummy and force him. He's like a ferret in a jewelry store, running every direction.

Oh, no!! Don't go to Buffalo!! We're 6 hours away! I'll tell him you will send some one.... a nun!! He went to catholic school... nuns are all-powerful. Yes, that would do it, if he won't read it you will send a nun to see that he does. Not one of the nice ones, a good old fashioned one in a penguin habit. And a big one at that!

We will get him through this.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use