Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Benefits For Being Married If You Are Legally Seperated

Rate this question


oldman273

Question

Hey got a question If a disabled veteran is not fully disabled at the 100% rating and gets legally seperated how does the VA handle the payments for the wife or husband who is not a veteran? I ask as I am looking at how the VA stipulates payment. I have no idea if any how they fight it out I just want to have the right ammount of money coming in and going out. Thanks and have a good day. I am not wanting to start a flame war or anything just hear what others have done or had done to them. Thanks again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Interesting question..........lodgic would dictate that the amount the VA paid on the spouse would go to the spouse until a divorce was final and then she gets squat........From the VA funds of course.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When I divorced, in 2000, I notified the VA when we no longer lived together and were seeking a divorce. They deducted the amount they would have paid, for my spouse, from my check (about $130 a month). I notified them to prevent me being over paid and having to reimburse them for the overpayment. She got nothing. Technically, I probably could have collected, for her, as we were still married, but I chose not to.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Im pretty sure VA benefits checks, including the amount(s) applicable for dependents are made out to the Veteran. If you are married, then you are entiltled to additional dependent compensation if you are at least 30% SC or are getting NSC pension.

Further, you are legally still married even if you have signed seperation papers and/or have filed for divorce until a judge "signs off" that you are divorced. I take this to mean that the VA has a "presumption" that you will provide for your spouse/dependents until/unless there is another contrary court order, such as a divorce order or custody order, where the judge often specifies who will "take the tax deduction" for dependents.

If you are seperated by an agreement between the parties, then the courts will usually not get involved..they have plenty of divorces where court intervention is needed to not get involved where there is an agreement of parties, especially if there are no children involved, or any kind of abuse. If the court finds evidence of abuse, then that will change things usually in the interests of the abused.

When I got my divorce, the court made this clear: They want us to work out our own resolutions to our differences. They also explained that if we can not resolve our differences together the court WILL intervene but that neither of us will likely be satisfied with the outcome, so we are far better off to resolve our differences outside the court system. The court always has limited resourcess and they dont want to use limited time to resolve differences that could be resolved by the parties.

In summary, best is to work out an acceptable arraingement agreeable to both parties. If this is impossible, for example, if one person is too greedy, then you can expect the court to also take "a piece of the pie" because if the court has to administer forced child support, for example, then it is highly likely the "greedy party" will have to not only pay child support, but also court fees, for administering it and collecting it.

Do what you think is right, but if the court intervenes, it probably wont be pretty, so I recommend a rather generous attitude will save you from a lot of grief, and a lot of expensive court battles.

The VA has something called an "apportionment". If a court order decrees that a spouse is entitled to a portion of the Veterans benefits, then they can send that amount of money to the spouse. It is largely a myth that an ex spouse cant get at the benefits...the protections in place are from creditors and do not prohibit the VA from forcing the Veteran to pay child support. Lincoln's promise was to the Veteran AND HIS WIDOW, so the Va takes care of children and "injured" spouses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA has something called an "apportionment". If a court order decrees that a spouse is entitled to a portion of the Veterans benefits, then they can send that amount of money to the spouse. It is largely a myth that an ex spouse cant get at the benefits...the protections in place are from creditors and do not prohibit the VA from forcing the Veteran to pay child support. Lincoln's promise was to the Veteran AND HIS WIDOW, so the Va takes care of children and "injured" spouses.

The EX is not getting it, the child is! We all need to keep that in mind!! I paid mine and was happy to even when the bitch would not let me see him due to the as$$%e she met and said the "I do" to. Yes the laws do say that VA come can be used to pay CS. Anyone not paying CS needs to go to jail.

Edited by Gulfvet45

James A. Bunker

Executive Director

National Gulf War Resource Center

Phone: 785-925-9887

Email: Do not post your email address.

Join us on Facebook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until a veteran is divorced he is entitle to the "little" spousal pay that he receives.

From what I understand, the va doesn't even get involved in child support issues. The only time I have ever seen the va garnish va compensation is when the veteran owes the va for an overpayment, or defaulted home loan. The money the va pays a veteran for children, or spouse belongs to the veteran. It is up to the courts and the parties concerned to determine child support. My understanding is that VA disability is protected from any garnishment to include court ordered child support payments.

Remember va disability is not community property and the ex has no legal right to it regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Did not see anything where the OP was refering to child support, and we have beat the ex spouse BS to death.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use