Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Reviews

Rate this question


Papa

Question

At the moment I can not recall if I decided to have a DRO review or BVA, but I do not think that I have the capability to represent myself, so I do have a Law Firm representing me. Will I still have to do all the talking, or will my lawyer do the talking. No date has been set, but it makes me very nervous.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Generally speaking, I think it's better for the veteran to do the talking.

If you have a hearing, whether DRO or BVA, it's likely that your lawyer will offer suggestions as how to answer the questions.

Answer the questions asked. Don't volunteer information. .

At the moment I can not recall if I decided to have a DRO review or BVA, but I do not think that I have the capability to represent myself, so I do have a Law Firm representing me. Will I still have to do all the talking, or will my lawyer do the talking. No date has been set, but it makes me very nervous.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you need to find out if you have a DRO, if not get that first then the BVA. most time a good DRO will grant you the claim faster at your RO.

You and your rep should be there. you may need to do some talking, but he should present your cases as to the points of the law and just what is wrong and why you should be granted your claim. It is his years of working theses types of claim that will win your claim.

James A. Bunker

Executive Director

National Gulf War Resource Center

Phone: 785-925-9887

Email: Do not post your email address.

Join us on Facebook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you need to find out if you have a DRO, if not get that first then the BVA.

most time a good DRO will grant you the claim faster at your RO.

You and your rep should be there. you may need to do some talking,

but he should present your cases as to the points of the law and just what is wrong and why you should be granted your claim.

It is his years of working theses types of claim that will win your claim.

A good DRO that actually meets their responsibility's will take the time required

to review the prior denial (or whatever the issues are) factor in and consider all

evidence of record, request any additional medical test that might need to be scheduled.

A good DRO will ask specific questions to clarify or help resolve any prior negative findings,

or conclusions.

A good DRO will correctly apply the laws and regs to the evidence of record for just adjudication.

Claims are won by having probable and credible evidence of record, that meets the requirements

and criteria of the laws and regs.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Carlie,

I really like what you posted and wish I could have found a good DRO. It seems that some of the RO's have good DROs. Houston has been rated for a number of years as being the worst Regional Office in the group of 57.

I was really hoping that the DRO I had would have caught the record , but they failed. Yes they did rated me at 30 percent COPD and Restricted Lung disease but the Progress reports from June 23 , 2010 and the Fee Basis Cardio Doctor show that the Pulmonary Hypertension is there and undeniable.

According to the Diagnostic code of 6604 , Pulmonary Hypertension is 100 Percent P and T. I hope to get a good DRO and not complaining about what they did find , but they did miss alot also.

I think that smaller RO s will also have better DROS who are not worked at hard as others.

I don't know what to think at this point but I can say the IHD, HYPERTENSION and PN are going to the BVA because of the failure to see AO in the evidence and the DRO copied and pasted the denial from the first one and did it again on the IHD and PN on the NOD .

Do you have any thoughts on this problem? As always I will NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless. C.C.

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would like to find a DRO that would grant a CUE even if it cost the VA 40 years of retro at the 100% rate.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use