Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claims For Secondary Conditions And Tdiu

Rate this question


Married to a Vet

Question

Hi to all,

I'm new here, as a member and this is my first post. I'm looking for your opinions on how best to help my husband handle his pending claim.

My husband is a USAF Gulf War veteran and was originally rated 0% for his back in 1996. He filed for an increase in 2006 and was granted 10% for DJD. He again filed in 2007 and was denied. The current claim was filed in Nov. 2010. He did not list individual symptoms but filed for the knee, hip and ankle in an effort to receive consideration of the entire right leg and foot. His V.A. medical records and the report from his C&P exam extensively document significant changes in the Service Connected DJD as well as Depression, Pain Disorder, and Radiculopathy which are all related (secondary) to the Service Connected DJD. At the time he filed the 2010 claim he did not know all of these medical terms and in some cases there was not yet a specific diagnoses.

So maybe a bit more to the point...

When filing claims which are secondary to an already existing SC condition are ALL secondary conditions found through the C&P exam or as a matter of record (V.A. medical records) considered and rated or will they be disregarded because he did not specifically file for those conditions?

I ask the next question because after reading the VA TRAINING LETTER 10-07

Adjudication of Claims for Total Disability Based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) I think he could qualify because it states under the Background heading (see bold type)...

"VA has a longstanding and well-established policy of granting total disability

ratings to Veterans who, due to service-connected disability(ies), are unable to

secure and maintain substantially gainful employment even if a Veteran’s

combined disability evaluation does not result in a total schedular evaluation. The

provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a) provide the minimal schedular standards for

TDIU consideration: if there is one disability, this disability shall be ratable at 60

percent or more; and, if there are two or more disabilities, there must be at least

one disability ratable at 40 percent or more and additional disability to bring the

combined rating to 70 percent or more. Alternatively, if these schedular

requirements are not met, but the evidence shows the Veteran is unemployable

due to service-connected disabilities, 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b) authorizes VA to grant a

TDIU evaluation on an extra-schedular basis upon approval by the Director,

Compensation and Pension Service."

Should he file a VAF 21-8940 and submit a second copy of his letter from SSA granting his disability or wait and use it in an appeal if they 'overlook' the inferred TDIU? The letter would show that another Government agency has deemed him unable to maintain employment (based on his VA medical records). Our tax record could also show his earned wages to be less than the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, poverty threshold for one person for at least the last 12 months.

Note: I found a link to the VA TRAINING LETTER 10-07 on this site. If I've done this right you can click here to find it. The file is in PDF format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

When filing for a secondary condition you need a doctor's letter to draw the nexus between the primary SC condition and the secondary condition you are trying to get SC'ed. For instance, I have arteriosclerosis(spelling), and I have DMII. I wanted to get the artery disease secondary to the DMII. It is quite common for this to be the case but you still need a doctor who is qualifed to say it is at least as likely as not for it to be seconday. Even after I went for the C&P exam the exam doctor said I had just a 0% rating for artry secondary to dmii. I had to appeal and then I got 60% rating after taking two more tests. You have to establish something is secondary unless it is presumptive and then you have to show what the rating should be. I have never gotten a break that I did not have to prove.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use