Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mishandle Service Medical Records At Va

Rate this question


add55p

Question

Has anyone on this site or know of someone that had their claim awarded in accordance with Secretary Peake's Mishandled claim Fast Letter 08-41 based on missing service medical records that were in the possession of the VA, but subsequent misplaced or lost?

In my case, I submitted three pieces of evidence documenation to the Department of Veterans Affairs that state that my SMRs were sent to their agency in 2007.

The VA denied my claim in 2008 stating that service medical records were not available for review, therefore their is no proof of in service incurrence of my current claimed condition.

Just before the Novemeber 2009 deadline for submitting mishandled documents contentions, I requested reconsideration of my denied claim under the fast letter instructions.

VA is reconsidering the claim. In response to their VACC Notice for this special claim for reconsideration under fast letter 08-41, I sent in the confirmation notice that I had received the VCAA notice and resent the 3 evidence documents showing that my now missing SMRs were sent to their agency in 2007.

The 2007 claim is back in the review of evidence status on ebenefis and has been there since 2009. No movement what so ever. I read that VA sometimes closes claims after one year of inactivity, but I have checked and this is not the case with mine. I am not sure what the are doing.

The VSO rep that I had was dismissed by me because he stated that despite me having the fact documents showing that the SMRs were shipped to VA, until they find the SMRs and prove the condition was noted in service, I was wasting my time submitting a request for reconsideration under the fast letter. The VSO stated that he would not assist in the fast letter reconsideration becasue it was a waste of time.

Unfortunately, the way I read the Fast Letter 08-41 instructions, I truly believe that I have a chance.

Could it be that the evidence documents that showed my SMRs being sent to thier agency trigerred VA to conduct an all out search of their facility for the missing SMRs?

If the SMRs are found, all of the evidence to support my in service incurrence evidence would be in them. This is the only reason that they give for the denial.

I have also sent alternative evidence (letter from sister, my in service company commander, and the name of the Army doctor and various Army hospitals that treated me during service).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You need to closely look at the following. Title 38 CFR 3.156 C.

Your answer lies in t here.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jbasser

I read Title 38 CFR 3.146 C and it states that if SMRs are located at a later date, the effective date can be the date of the original claim.

My problem is that while I have 3 factual evidence documents to support that my service medical records were sent to the Department of Veterans Affairs, there is no indication that the SMRs will surface support me even getting an award.

I am hoping that the Department of Veteran Affairs finds my records that were shown to be in their possesion in 2007.

Would this paricular situation be hinges on The Construction Notice Rule".

It is very unfortuenate that the burden of proof is on the Veteran to prove in service occurence when the VA had and lost the SMR that would prove the veteran's case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Even when the VA has lost or excluded either medical evidence or medical records and you can prove it you don't always win a CUE. The lost or excluded evidence must undeniably prove that you deserve a higher raring or service connection. So you lost records say you have severe PTSD and the VA says you don't have it. Those lost records must undeniably prove to reasonable minds you deserve a higher rating or SC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John

I understand that the service medical records are essentional to certifying in service ocuurence of a claimed condition and you have a very narow chance of getting an award without the in service proof.

The problem that I am having is that the VA is ignoring my alternative evidence, pr their regulation.

According the 38 CFR, VA/BVA has a heightened duty to assist when the Vetran's records were in the custody of a government agency and subsequently lost.

Are you suggesting that there is no way that an award can be granted absent the Service Medical Records?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jbasser

I read Title 38 CFR 3.146 C and it states that if SMRs are located at a later date, the effective date can be the date of the original claim.

My problem is that while I have 3 factual evidence documents to support that my service medical records were sent to the Department of Veterans Affairs, there is no indication that the SMRs will surface support me even getting an award.

I am hoping that the Department of Veteran Affairs finds my records that were shown to be in their possesion in 2007.

Would this paricular situation be hinges on The Construction Notice Rule".

It is very unfortuenate that the burden of proof is on the Veteran to prove in service occurence when the VA had and lost the SMR that would prove the veteran's case.

It may be time to call the RO and your VSO and plan a trip to view your claims folder. That activity often gets things jump started.

You have that right to do so.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use