Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Set Back For Vets

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

While I agree this is a set back for vets, including myself, I must say that I agree. Without bringing politics into this discussion, we all pledged to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, and I believe the courts have this correct. Yes, this is painful for me to admit, but instead of putting our hope into the courts, it still all falls into the hands of the legislative and executive branches. There are many issues which surround us Veterans, but a major issue is finances and effeciency. These are realms of Congress, and we have to focus our attention and whatever resources we have as individuals and groups towards the 535 members of Congress to fund this beast, and the executive branch to appoint and install people who are competent and capable.

Semper Fi my friends!!

Sgt. Wilky

BOHICA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree this is a set back for vets, including myself, I must say that I agree. Without bringing politics into this discussion, we all pledged to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, and I believe the courts have this correct. Yes, this is painful for me to admit, but instead of putting our hope into the courts, it still all falls into the hands of the legislative and executive branches. There are many issues which surround us Veterans, but a major issue is finances and effeciency. These are realms of Congress, and we have to focus our attention and whatever resources we have as individuals and groups towards the 535 members of Congress to fund this beast, and the executive branch to appoint and install people who are competent and capable.

Semper Fi my friends!!

Sgt. Wilky

Well I disagree with you .. for years The VA, and congress have screwed veterans. Of course the courts have the right and I dare say the responsibility and duty to make departments of the government to do their jobs correctly. The courts have decided in a number of cases (bradley v Peake is a good example) that the va is wrong in many cases. If anyone thinks that Congress or the va are going to fix anything on their own, I have a bridge to sell you. If not the courts then who.... everyone answers to a higher power....

Edited by Teac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Yea, right...like Congress "could" fix the VA. If congress could "fix" the VA, why then did they fail to do so over the past 50 years or so? So that Vets have to rely upon the courts? Now, this is the ultimate "pass the buck" philosophy of our government with each agency wanting to put the blame on someone else.

Now, the VA can say, "Gee, Mr. Veteran, I would like to get your claim done in less than a decade, but this is Congress' fault".

If "pro" is the opposite of "con", then what is the opposite of progress?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If blacks in the South were as quite and disorganized as veterans they would still be living under Jim Crow. I am not betting money on the VA changing in my life time. Save at least 10% of your checks each month and start your escape plan to some more friendly country. Most vets are Vietnam era vets and you know what the nation thinks of us.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The way things are, (and have been for decades) Congress has the authority and responsibility to "fix" the VA. Unfortunately, virtually everything that needs to be done will cost more money. This translates into less money available for other more popular uses. Since there is never enough money available, the VA has been shortchanged ever since the end of WWII. VA's use of what it has can also be questioned. Congress, for example might enact and impose time limits on the VA. Under current rules, this would require a "how much is this gonna cost excercise", and the results will not be to the liking of many. The time limit problem must be addressed in a way that points out the moral and real responsibility of Congress and the VA to correct things.

Yea, right...like Congress "could" fix the VA. If congress could "fix" the VA, why then did they fail to do so over the past 50 years or so? So that Vets have to rely upon the courts? Now, this is the ultimate "pass the buck" philosophy of our government with each agency wanting to put the blame on someone else.

Now, the VA can say, "Gee, Mr. Veteran, I would like to get your claim done in less than a decade, but this is Congress' fault".

If "pro" is the opposite of "con", then what is the opposite of progress?

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I disagree with you .. for years The VA, and congress have screwed veterans. Of course the courts have the right and I dare say the responsibility and duty to make departments of the government to do their jobs correctly. The courts have decided in a number of cases (bradley v Peake is a good example) that the va is wrong in many cases. If anyone thinks that Congress or the va are going to fix anything on their own, I have a bridge to sell you. If not the courts then who.... everyone answers to a higher power....

I agree with you that the VA and Congress have screwed veterans. I'm not disputing that. The courts though, have extremely limited ENFORCEMENT authority! What are they going to do? Send the Marshall's to the chambers of Congress or to the VA? Ridiculous. I understand this is an emotional issue for many veterans, myself included. But putting emotions aside, and looking at the Constitiution, the dispersement of money to the various agencies falls only on Congress. The courts may pass whatever ruling they please, but Congress can tell them (the courts) to go screw themselves. I'm not saying that we should give up our fight, and we can and should fight for our cause in whatever venue we can, and yes, that includes the courts, but if Congress refuses to act and force the VA to make the changes, and give the VA the funds to do it, it will not happen. The courts' higher power is the legislatures of the States and Federal Government, and rarely are any courts censored or judges impeached. So, the highest "power" in America is Congress, and that's the way it was set up; and it was set up that way for a reason. Congress answers to 'we the people.' If we can get the public on our side, and force the issue on Congress, changes will be made, and more importantly, they will be made within rules that govern our country.

BOHICA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use