Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Notice Of Disagreement?

Rate this question


SSGmajik

Question

I wanted to get some thoughts on how I should approach my disagreement with the VA's decision on my rating. I filed 10/2010 for TDIU. I received a rating decision in 04/2012 and my TDIU was deferred. All ratings below are all service connected.

In my rating decision for both my neck and lower back were lowered, because of the C&P doctor statement from my exam in 11/2010. My lower back was lowered from 40% to 20%, because C&P examiner said I had a forward flexion of 60 degrees, but he did not even do a ROM exam! Also, in 03/2010 my Neurosurgeon did a ROM exam a said I was limited to 10 degrees due to increased pain! Again, C&P examiner said that he did a ROM and I performed all movements and he stated "Physical examined revealed no objective evidence of painful motion, spasms, or weakness". I'm in constant pain and have a lot of spasms, especially when being put through a ROM exam, and my sciatic nerve is damaged and causes weakness in my right leg! All documented in my medical file. I am also on strong pain medication! My neurosurgeon also stated in his notes that my condition will only deteriorate and get worse. The VA has all this documentation as well.

Same exact scenario happened with my neck. No ROM exam, but C&P examiner put same BS as above and said I had a forward flexion of 35 degrees and it lowered my neck from 20% to 10%.

So, last week I saw a physical therapist at the VA who performed a ROM exam with a goniometer by request from my PCP. He measured each movement 3 times. Relevant measurements were on average, Lumbar Flexion 11 degrees, and cervical flexion 29 degrees. According to the CFR 38 part 4.71a my lumbar should have stayed at 40% as well as my neck at 20%.

I'm not sure what to do from here. I saw my VSO and he showed me my TDIU claim has not even been looked at since a rating decision was made in April. Plus, he thought it was unusual for a claim to be this old and complex that there was only 6 notes in the system on my claim.

Should I file a notice of disagreement now and add this new ROM as new evidence and ask why the ROM performed by my neurosurgeon in 03/2010 was overruled by the C&P examiner?

What other proof due I need that shows that the C&P examiner lied or to discredit him?

Does anyone have a good format for a Notice Of Disagreement letter?

Any help, info, & opinions is always appreciated!

Thanks,

SSGmajik

Thank you to all who are serving or have served our great country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thank you Carlie! The evidence was current and was submitted with my claim in 10/2010 & an ROI was as well. They did not have it listed in the evidence page in the rating notification letter nor was it mentioned in their reasoning for lowering it. They only stated evidence from the C&P exam. Is there a form I need to send to reopen my claim with this evidence?

Sorry, but I do not know what R&B or N&M stands for.

New and Material (evidence)

Reasons and Bases (for the decision)

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New and Material (evidence)

Reasons and Bases (for the decision)

Thanks for letting me know!

Thank you to all who are serving or have served our great country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an interesting thread about C&P exams.

Wing's post #3 also shows part of a BVA decision where the Board found

:

"Given the fatal deficiency in the March 2008 examination report, as well as the inadequacy of the January 2008 examination report, there was no evidentiary basis to conclude that the Veteran's hearing loss had improved. 38 C.F.R. § 3.344©. There was no other evidence on file at the time of the reduction that suggested any improvement in the disorder. Consequently, there was no basis for the reduction, and the 20 percent rating is restored, effective from the date of the reduction."

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you 71M10! The VA only used the C&P examiner's measurements and did not even say anything about my neurosurgeons measurements. I do have a copy of the C&P exam and the examiner did not state that he measured each movement 3 times. I got a copy of it 2 months after the exam and sent a letter to the VA asking for a new one stating that a ROM was never performed. The VA does have my Neurosurgeon documentation, but did not list it as evidence in my rating decision. Any advice on how I should word and format a NOD? Currently my total rating is.....

Depression- 50%

Lumbar- 20% (Was 40%)

Neck- 10% (Was 20%)

Radiculopathy/nerve damage- 10%

Residuals, Surgical Scar- 0% (Was 10%) C&P examiner also lied on this one too. Never touched my scar, which it has scar tissue attached to my nerve and burns & stings when touched!

How can they just randomly lower your rating like that? I have heard the horror stories but I am yet to experience it myself 1st hand. I have also heard people talk about not submitting a claim cause they might lower their overall rating. Is there that many mistakes and random variables in any one person's record that upon closer examination, they could find XYZ reasons to lower your rating?

Maybe i just dont "Get it" can someone explain?

Contentions:

Proposed rating of 90%

Non obstructive sleep apnea (6847)----30% --"actually rated for hypersomnolence"

Migraine (8100)--------------------------------30%

right bicipital tendonitis (5201) -----------20%

DDD Lumbo Spine (5243)------------------20%

Bulging lumbar L-5-S-1/sacral radiculopathy at S-1(8620)-----10%

Knee (Bi-Lat) (5261) ------------------------10% & 10%

Ankle (Bi-Lat) (5271)-----------------------10% & 10%

Planter Fascitis (Bi-Lat)(5284) ----------10% & 10%

Tinnitus (6260)-------------------------------10%

GERD (7399-7346)--------------------------10%

Carpal Tunnel (Bi-Lat) (8515)-------------10% & 10%

Insomnia (499-9433)------------------------10%

Allergic Rhinitis---------------------------------0%

Depression/Mood Disorder----------------DID NOT INCLUDE IN THE RATING! WTF?

Proposed that the following conditions are not related to your military service

Viral Gastroenteritis

Essential hypertrigly ceridermia

As of 27 July 2012..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an interesting thread about C&P exams.

Wing's post #3 also shows part of a BVA decision where the Board found

:

"Given the fatal deficiency in the March 2008 examination report, as well as the inadequacy of the January 2008 examination report, there was no evidentiary basis to conclude that the Veteran's hearing loss had improved. 38 C.F.R. § 3.344©. There was no other evidence on file at the time of the reduction that suggested any improvement in the disorder. Consequently, there was no basis for the reduction, and the 20 percent rating is restored, effective from the date of the reduction."

Wow! At least they admitted their mistake, but to put the veteran through all this trouble is ridiculous! It's unfair that we have to prove their mistake, but they can lower our rating or state our condition is improving without proof!

Thank you to all who are serving or have served our great country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can they just randomly lower your rating like that? I have heard the horror stories but I am yet to experience it myself 1st hand. I have also heard people talk about not submitting a claim cause they might lower their overall rating. Is there that many mistakes and random variables in any one person's record that upon closer examination, they could find XYZ reasons to lower your rating?

Maybe i just dont "Get it" can someone explain?

They simply went by my C&P examiner who apparently was disgruntled! He pretty much made up my whole C&P exam! All my medical evidence shows my back condition is deteriorating & will not improve, but only get worse! I was even approved for a medical retirement from government job right before I filed my claim! They do what they want & hope you just don't fight it, but if you do you have to prove them wrong!

Thank you to all who are serving or have served our great country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use