Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Odd C&p Exam

Rate this question


ntyler0341

Question

I had my C&P Exam this morning. A couple of things I found odd. First things first, the examiner told me I HAVE to be seen by the VA, pertaining to my claims of GWI. Am I missing something here? I have my own Primary Care Provider, and submitted documented evidence. #2 he questioned my rash claim, as if it seemed like he was trying to discount my claims. Granted, I had no irashes during my appointment. Once again, this is documented through my Primary Care Provider.

I had an awkward feeling, so I had asked him for a copy of my Gulf War Registry Exam I had taken almost 4 years ago. So I go to med records and get them. My claims arent any different today than what they were 4 years ago. What I had come across was very high white blood cell counts every time I drew blood, meaning my body is fighting an infection. Also, this guy had diagnosed me with PTSD. At no time, was I notified of this. Odd.

So, whats the opinion on HAVING to be seen by a VA doctor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

It's generally NOT a requirement. Having said that, the VA C&P examiner was probably miffed due to the lack of VA medical records, and easy access to them.

After all, it might be that you don't live in a location that has easy access to VA medical facilities.

You mentioned "High White Cell counts" as a persistent problem. I certainly hope that your private provider has tried to find out why, and if necessary, referred you to those able to determine the cause.

The PTSD bit gets into a contentious area, and may have been behind the "have to be seen" statement. The VA claims that they are the only ones (by VA regulation) able to diagnose PTSD.

This is in opposition to past practice, court rulings, and language in the laws that govern the VA. The validity of the new VA PTSD regs, to my limited knowledge, has not yet been tested in federal courts.

Years ago, the VSOs often advised veterans to at least utilize the "veteran's drug act", in order to have at least minimal VA medical records of treatment on file.

Personally, I usually darken the VA's doorstep once or twice a year, although the benefits and the hassles are about equal. At least, the VA in my case, provides "free" prescriptions. When I started this practice, with no SC'd conditions, I was paying a co-pay of $2.50, much less than my insurance co-pay. At one point, I got into a small "fight" when the VA was trying to charge a "visit" co-pay. I successfully challenged that, based on the fact that the VA was not "treating" me, just reviewing and re-issuing prescriptions originated by my private physicians. An issue I never investigated or totally resolved was that all the conditions I take prescription drugs for were retroactively SC'd. But, the EDD was later than when I started taking the drugs, first using the usual insurance route, then as available, from the VA. To this day, I don't know if the VA refunded the drug co-pays back to the EDD date, or back to the date the VA originally started providing them subject to co-pay. The VA's accounting statements did not have enough detail to determine what dates they used. I also never found out what if anything, the VA refunded to the insurance companies.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apologies. I did tell this doctor that it took me over 5 hours to get here. I am as remote as it gets, guaranteed. The documents i received from the VA, past visits, show all my blood work. So I will be bringing these documents to my PCP.

This doctors exact words, after my visit, "compensation isnt as important as getting care. You need to see a VA doctor for your illnesses."

It was as if it were a threat, the compensation part. I have a doctor. It just so happens he isnt a VA doctor. He is 5 minutes from my house. Not over 6 hours and a ferry ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doc would be correct IF the VA doctors had a friggin' clue as to how to treat GWI. I saw my neurologist yesterday and gave him a handful of recent GWI research reports. The first thing he did was look for treatment recommendations because he basically admitted that he didn't know what to do other than treat my symptoms. As far as I can tell, for now anyway, an outside doc is just as good as a VA doc in the level of care and expertise they can provide.

Sometimes I think that the docs that are relegated to doing C&P exams full time are there because they aren't up to snuff to treat patients or they screwed up somehow and that is the only position they will let them have. Regardless, not a one of my C&P docs have ever had a clue what I was talking about when I brought up toxic exposures and GWI. Its pretty sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The doctor who did my GWI exam at the waco va, told me they are seeing alot of patterns in the ilnesses among gulf war vets, and she would be very surprized, if alot more presumptive ilnesses were not added to the list in the coming years. Kidney cancer is one of the more prevelant ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use