Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

3 Out Of 4 Appealed Claims To Bva - Success!

Rate this topic


Troy Spurlock

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Troy,

Big shout out of congrats to you on these victories.

Remember that service org that didn't accept you ?

This just proves they missed the boat.

Are you repping these vets via a 21-22a ?

Never mind the question above as I found the answer.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp12/files1/1204107.txt

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Troy,

Big shout out of congrats to you on these victories.

Remember that service org that didn't accept you ?

This just proves they missed the boat.

Are you repping these vets via a 21-22a ?

Never mind the question above as I found the answer.

http://www.va.gov/ve...es1/1204107.txt

What's really sad about that ruling is the misdiagnosis of a general medical practitioner as "acne vulgaris with boils" and the lay statements from his wife and second wife, in addition to friends and family (as well as the veteran), that detailed in sickening detail of the puss and smell and pain he went through due to 'chloracne,' a skin condition that medically shown in my argument that even the most expert of dermatologists admit that they have difficulty in differentiating between acne and chloracne.

Notwithstanding, it was was a win nonetheless; sadly the RO is dragging its feet since Feb. 2012 when the BVA ruled on this to give him a S/C % rating. That's all we're waiting on right now.

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Troy......This is a huge win......and look at the timeframe. Not nearly the long time frame that normally happens. Maybe the VARO you are dealing with is one of the better ones but it also helped to the accuracy of the information you supplied. Well done Troy. I wonder what that VSO would say now. Your claim shows specifically that the Veteran is the only one that really can make his claim understandable. And it helps when you have brothers and sisters here to help cover your back. Your 1151 claim is very interesting to me also as well as others here. Please keep us posted. CONGRATS and you proved that the Veteran can .....NEVER GIVE UP . God Bless, C.C.

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all...

And thank you all for your service and continued service in helping other veterans yourself. Even the discussions herein help those of us either advocating for ourselves or for others.

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use