Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Smc

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

New to the board....Need to know if I meet requirements for SMC S? Im 100% TDIU permanant and tota sine 2004l...other ratings Hysterectomy 30

Endometriosis 50

PTSD 70

If so, what are my next steps. If not, thanks very much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

New to the board....Need to know if I meet requirements for SMC S? Im 100% TDIU permanant and tota sine 2004l...other ratings Hysterectomy 30

Endometriosis 50

PTSD 70

If so, what are my next steps. If not, thanks very much.

New to the board....Need to know if I meet requirements for SMC S? Im 100% TDIU permanant and tota sine 2004l...other ratings Hysterectomy 30

Endometriosis 50

PTSD 70

If so, what are my next steps. If not, thanks very much.

Do your docs state in writing that you are housebound or in need of

A&A due solely to your SC'd disabilities ?

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

New to the board....Need to know if I meet requirements for SMC S? Im 100% TDIU permanant and tota sine 2004l...other ratings Hysterectomy 30

Endometriosis 50

PTSD 70

If so, what are my next steps. If not, thanks very much.

If your PTSD, solely, makes you TDIU, then I would say "yes." If not, then "no." jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Based on what you posted, yes. To start off, send it a 21-4138 to your regional office, requesting SMC S, under Bradley Vs Peake

AND OR housebound in fact.

If you do not qualify under Bradley, you can still get "housebound in fact", but you would likely have to have a C and P exam, unless there is already evidence in your med records that you are housebound.

I suggest you also ask for retro to the date of your most recent ratings, since SMC S is automatically inferred if you meet Bradley Peake criteria, and, it would appear you do. You can read up on Bradley vs Peake, there is much on it. Without reviewing your medical records and c file, along with your decisions, however, we dont know for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses. My PTSD is why Im getting the TDIU. AT this time I have not been told that I am housebound by a doctor but my psych Dr. is recommending for the TeleMental Program?

I have done as suggested and requested my c-file. However, the benefits counselor said that I do not qualify because I have no LOSS of USE of legs, arms, etc....I didn't qant to question anymore since I didn't have a good understanding of Bradley Peake

Oh yeah I do get SMC K for loss of creative organs...ovary and uterus. Oh yeah, I was just inpatient again for PTSD....would trying to get it raised do anything to help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Mizz

Your benefits couselor is dead wrong. I think you qualify for HB by virtue of Bradley v Peake. I would file a claim for HB. I was TDIU for a couple of mental conditions. About 7 years later I got 60% for a heart condition. I was not automatically granted HB. Thanks to Teac, Phil, Pete, Carlie and others here I filed for HB and got 2 years retro. The VA called a CUE on themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use