Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

answered

Rate this question


petr702

Question

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

First, I do not see why you shouldn't file for IU if you feel you can't work. Do you feel you can work with the Neuropathy going on? Only you can answer this.

Second, It doesn't make a difference if your using Chapter 31 but the VA will try to utilize your college graduate status as weight for them not to give you UI, this is where an IMO/IME comes into play.

You and me are very similar,except our issues. In 1996 I was given SC'd at 0% for neck and lower back. I walked away from my appointment back then but I didn't want anything to do with the VA nor did I want their money, I just wanted to make sure I was SC'd. I was warned about getting this from service members before I got out. Well I am glad I did that because in 2010 both of those issue severly got worse and I finally gave in and filed for an increase.

To make a long story short, in 2011 I applied for Chapter 31 benefits and was approved. I have been in college since June 2011 but my issues are getting worse which caused me to finally quit work in May 2012. I couldn't go any longer because of the pain in my arms, chest, neck, mid back, lower back and legs. Now I have pain in my toes. I filed for IU in June 2012 and they are just now moving the claim forward. I currently have a NOD for things they denied but I have a IMO/IME that connected the dots the VA didn't want to do. My Voc Rehab Counselor stated that she doesn't believe I can go back to work but she knows I am not working and she has not stopped my Chapter 31 benefits. I think she is waiting to see if the VA awards my IU and/or makes a decision with my NOD I currently have. Eitheway, the VA is now stuck like chuck with that IMO/IME that was done on my issues. They know that eitherway I am 100% but which one is cheaper for them is the IU.

Anyway, what I am tyring to say is that only you know if you can keep working. Do you feel you can work? My advice is that it won't hurt to file for IU but you need a doctor stating you can't work. In my IMO/IME report the doctor stated it was his opinion I can't go back to work with these issues and the meds I am on. This same letter was used for LTD insurance and they are using it for SSDI. I personally didn't want to go this route, I didn't but I have to look out for my family. That was my only reason why I am going this route, FAMILY.....Like you said "stuff got worse"...How worse will they be lets say in two years from now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If one of your ratings is not at least 40% the VA will give you a technical struggle for TDIU. If you cannot work due solely to SC conditions you are eligible to file for TDIU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Today, we proudly usher in a new era for hardworking Americans with disabilities."

These words were spoken by American Diabetes Association Chair of the Board Stewart Perry upon the September 25, 2008 signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA).

Because of the ADAAA people with diabetes will no longer face a Catch 22 in which they can be denied a job explicitly because of their diabetes – but then told they don't have the right to fight this discrimination in court because they take such good care of themselves that they don't have a "disability" as defined by federal law.

Under the ADAAA people with diabetes and other chronic illnesses – people that Congress clearly intended to cover when it passed the original Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990 – are once again within the law's umbrella of protection.

http://www.diabetes.org/living-with-diabetes/know-your-rights/discrimination/employment-discrimination/americans-with-disabilities-act-amendments-act/

I would not tolerate someone denying me a job due to my need for refrigeration. You lose nothing by filing for IU, If they deny you then you are in the same position you are today. But don't wait to do it. You only get paid from the day of filing and they have a back log. You should check out my blog.

http://vabenefitawareness.wordpress.com/ be sure to use the search tool because some of my posts go into archive but they are full of important information. Search for filing a claim or claims, or appeals. If you already filed for IU you can appeal DO NOT FILE A NEW CLAIM unless you missed the appeal cut off date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Go ahead and file for IU, sooner rather than later. If you do get it, the earlier you apply the earlier will be your effective date. It is true, you dont currently meet the schedular minimum requirements of at least one disability rated at 40%. However, there is another route to TDIU, and that is the "extra-schedular IU" for precisely when you do not meet the schedular minimums.

LIkely best is to ask for an increase and simultaneously request IU, both schedular and extra schedular. You may well get an increase and meet the schedular requirements and be awarded IU at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Whether or not you get IU will largely depend on your evidence. For example, if your doc states that you can not work because of sc conditions such as DM or PN, then you should eventually get IU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one of your ratings is not at least 40% the VA will give you a technical struggle for TDIU. If you cannot work due solely to SC conditions you are eligible to file for TDIU.

I believe the DM and the upper and lower extremities neuropathy would be lumped together as all caused by the DM in order to reach the 40% if I read things correctly in the reg.

It's Hell to get old...things hurt, things quit working, BUT, it sure beats the alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use