Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ssdi Reevaluation?

Rate this question


StreetWalker

Question

If you're receiving SSDI are you on a schedule to be reevaluated?

Member of the Church of the Enlighten Pistolero.

I may be out-manned but I'll never be outgunned.

Shoot to stop the threat or till the magazine is empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA can't use that fact to deny you TDIU, as TDIU can be awarded temporarily. There's a chance SSDI will waive that re-evaluation at 5-7 yrs. You need to appeal the VA's decision denying you TDIU. I suggest reviewing M-21 for how the VA should handle claims for TDIU. If your SSDI is for the same disabilities that you are SC for the TDIU should be awarded. jmo

pr

My paperwork tells me I'm scheduled for reevaluation in 5-7 years.

The VA used the fact that I'm scheduled for a reevaluation as one of the reasons to deny my TDIU claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to appeal it. I have an appointment for a IMO next week. Going to lay a DBQ on the VA.

My SSDI is based solely on my service connected back. The only medical records they reviewed were my VA medical records.

The VA contract doctor that did my C&P did not to a complete exam, that exam contradicted every exam I've had over the past 10 years. She filled out the DBQ like she had done the complete exam then said I could do sedentary work in which does not involve lifting, squatting, bending or frequent twisting movements. She totally glossed over the fact that I can't sit in a normal chair for more than 15-20 minutes.

Here's the wording from the denial about SSDI.

Although your records from the Social Security Administration (SSA) indicate you are currently receiving social security disability for your back and other osteoarthritic conditions, the SSA records note your disabilities are subject to reevaluation and as such are not considered permanent in nature.

That leads me to try and figure out how to word my NOD. How do I tactfully point out that the decision is moronic.

Member of the Church of the Enlighten Pistolero.

I may be out-manned but I'll never be outgunned.

Shoot to stop the threat or till the magazine is empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The VA used the fact that I'm scheduled for a reevaluation as one of the reasons to deny my TDIU claim." Geez I said WTF out loud when I read that. PR is right.

I think they committed a CUE by using that statement.

I would think many if not most SSA disabilities are re evaluated and not considered as permanent.

For example

I had an Army husband hospitalized for 2 years due to removal of a brain tumor.

SSA would check with the hospital every 2 months to see if he had improved.mad.gif Much of the time he was in a coma or hooked up to Intensive care machines.

When he died I called SSA within an hour to tell them but they already knew because, as the woman told me, they had checked that same day to see if he was still disabled and hospitalized and was told he had expired.

I am dumbfounded by the statement the VA made regarding your SSDI.

What medical rationale did the VA state, (if any) to suggest that your SC is not "permanent in nature" and what the hell has that to do with TDIU?

You also said:

"The VA used the fact that I'm scheduled for a reevaluation as one of the reasons to deny my TDIU claim."

One reason...what were the other reasons?

PR is right and made a great point....M21-1MR has all the info available as to how the VA is supposed to decide all types of claims.

I have used print outs from M21-1MR and sent them to VA with some of my claims issues, to show them how they are supposed to do this stuff.

I sent M21 printouts with my pending 1151 claim as well as my Oct request that they CUE themselves.

38 CFR contains the regulations.

38 USC is the laws in the United States Code

M21-1MR is the enormous VA handbook ,updated from time to time when regs change, as to how these regs and laws are supposed to be applied by the VA.

If they interpret M21- MR wrong, to a claimant;s detriment, the VA has committed a CUE.

But we need to see the other reasons for the denial.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing used was the opinion of a contract C&P examiner that never completed my lumbar exam, yet she completed the DBQ to show that she had. Her finding go completely against every other exam I've had in the past 20 years. I've had this same examiner in the past and she missed things on that exam too. However in that case the rated used my medical record and the C&P didn't count for much.

My PCP wrote a letter back in August stating I was unemployable. I had SSA say I was unemployable. But one bad C&P exam counted more than those.

Here's the complete paragraph. I finally got it scanned in and OCR'ed.

10. Entitlement to individual unemployability.

Entitlement to individual unemployability is denied because the claimant has not been found unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service connected disabilities.
Although your records from the Social Security Administration (SSA) indicate you are currently receiving social security disability for yotu back and other osteoarthritic conditions, the SSA records note your disabilities are subject to reevaluation and as such considered not permanent in nature. Based on the evidence received from your VA examinations, the examiner opined that you are capable of sustaining and gaining employment in a sedentary environment that does not involve lifting, squatting, bending or frequent twisting movements.

Totally ignored in that finding was that I'm unable to sit more than 15-20 minutes in a normal chair. After that my back starts to lock up and my legs hurt even more. After about 30-40 minutes in a normal chair I'm pretty much screwed for the rest of the day. Of course the examiner never asked me about that.

Any help you could give me with filing my NOD would be greatly appreciated.

There was no medical rational used to explain why my degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy are not "permanent in nature".

I've got my whole award letter scanned to a .txt file but haven't gotten it cleaned up yet. I can send it to you if you want.

Edited by StreetWalker

Member of the Church of the Enlighten Pistolero.

I may be out-manned but I'll never be outgunned.

Shoot to stop the threat or till the magazine is empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where I stand so far.

I have obtained a copy of my SSA-831-C3 which is the Disability determination at transmittal.

In section 17 I have the following codes. Diary type - MRP, mo/yr - 07/2019, reason 7.

According to https://secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0426510020 these codes show that I'm "Medical Improvement Not Expected".

This directly conflicts the wording in my TDIU denial. Does this make the cut for a CUE?

Member of the Church of the Enlighten Pistolero.

I may be out-manned but I'll never be outgunned.

Shoot to stop the threat or till the magazine is empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My first time was 2 years, 2ed 3 years and last time 5 years.

US Navy Vet 1983-1989
*** Won the fight.

Fought the VA 1988 - 1996
Fought the SSA 1994 - 2002


Hadit member since 1996


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use