Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Agent Orange Information Fort Dietrich Maryland

Rate this question


Capt.

Question

Hello All,

Thru a post from member Ronin2033 on information on Fort Detrick , he has a great link to more DOD , US Army and other agencies. There are a number of other important sites that are listed and much research for those interested in obtaining more specific reports to help in their claims process.

Thank you Ronin and hope you can post any other AO documents finds. Remember that this is now ARCHIVED here at HADIT.COM ,,,,,,which boast the largest Veteran library of archived material to use for the veteran.

I still have not found any Beaumont News articles from the period you asked in another post but am still trying to find it.

Thanks again for your help for our Veterans . NEVER GIVE UP . God Bless, C.C.

http://www.detrick.army.mil/responsible/ArchivalReport2012.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you think that only 30%-40% of RVN vets have ever had AO exam it is sad since many will die from AO diseases. I think of their spouses who could have DIC if the Nam vet dies from IHD,CAD,prostate cancer, lung cancer, DMII complications etc. 850000 "boots on the ground" Nam vets left alive and all will probably die from AO exposure. I preach to every Nam vet I meet to get checked out for AO disease presumptives. The US government has put a death sentence on the head of everyone who served in Vietnam and probably surrounding areas at sea or on land. Kill millions of American servicemen and women and even more millions of South Vietnamese farmers. We were supposed to be saving them, but we had to kill them to save them. Better dead than red.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
When you think that only 30%-40% of RVN vets have ever had AO exam it is sad since many will die from AO diseases. I think of their spouses who could have DIC if the Nam vet dies from IHD,CAD,prostate cancer, lung cancer, DMII complications etc. 850000 "boots on the ground" Nam vets left alive and all will probably die from AO exposure. I preach to every Nam vet I meet to get checked out for AO disease presumptives. The US government has put a death sentence on the head of everyone who served in Vietnam and probably surrounding areas at sea or on land. Kill millions of American servicemen and women and even more millions of South Vietnamese farmers. We were supposed to be saving them, but we had to kill them to save them. Better dead than red.

John

It's that high?

From my own experience, the VA often said that the "A/O exam" was no different than the usual VA entrance exam given many veterans when they applied for such things as drug act benefits. I actually was awarded a claim for DMII, based upon A/O presumption, and the VA failed repeatedly to add me (and others) to the A/O "list". At one point, the "local" VAMC had a "person" with a fancy title, that was assigned to be the specialist for such matters, unbeknownst to the person. I had to go to the class action lawyers, and get them to ask the VA why I and thousands of others were not on the list furnished by court order to the Nehmer lawyers. Everyone had hoped that the issue would contribute to a contempt of court citation, but that hasn't happened to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You have to consider all the career military who were in Vietnam at one time or other. They many have been in the 30's or even 40's when they served. I think most of the 19 year olds are probably still alive, but I wonder when I read obits in my town. The 850,000 number is for "boots on the ground" Nam vets that I have heard often. I could be wrong and would not be unhappy if someone proves me wrong. The AO exam I got was pretty good. The doctor acted almost like an advocate. He wrote down three conditions he said were probably related to exposure to AO: DMII, PN and chronic pain from nerve damage. I still have the note he sent me If I can find it. I got it done in 2001 I think just for the hell of it.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to consider all the career military who were in Vietnam at one time or other. They many have been in the 30's or even 40's when they served. I think most of the 19 year olds are probably still alive, but I wonder when I read obits in my town. The 850,000 number is for "boots on the ground" Nam vets that I have heard often. I could be wrong and would not be unhappy if someone proves me wrong. The AO exam I got was pretty good. The doctor acted almost like an advocate. He wrote down three conditions he said were probably related to exposure to AO: DMII, PN and chronic pain from nerve damage. I still have the note he sent me If I can find it. I got it done in 2001 I think just for the hell of it.

John

The 850,000 number was the original number the DVA originally used for the number of Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans to inflate the cost of a restoration of presumption and benefits due to Agent Orange exposure. They used the 850,000 number with 100% still alive, 100% submitting claims, 100% approved at a 100% rating and a 1st year cost of about $28 Billion and a 10 year cost of about $203 Trillion. The number was later dropped to 512,000 which was still too high. Last session the two restoration acts used the number of 253,000 and while still too high is an acceptable number as long as the VA accounts for the number of Veterans who became presumed due to being on a Blue Water Vessel that traveled into brown water and the death rate. Using that number of 253,000 and using the standard percentages of claimants, approvals and ratings as well as the death rate and those who are deemed exposed due to brown water service, the 1st year cost, including any Nehmer claims is under $2.75 Billion with a 10 year cost of about $940 Billion.

Here are the numbers from the DoD

TOTAL ARMY AIR FORCE MARINES NAVY

NUMBER SERVING SOUTHEAST ASIA** 3,403,000 2,276,000 385,000 513,000 229,000

NUMBER SERVING SOUTH VIETNAM** 2,594,000 1,736,000 293,000 391,000 174,000

Blue Water Sailors of the Vietnam War

I don't bother with the junk science and anything factual I've read.... Steam Jockey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuck said:

"the VA often said that the "A/O exam" was no different than the usual VA entrance exam given many veterans"

I knew our deceased inhouse veteran's lawyer, Alex Humphrey, who was at hadit for many years ,from the Prodigy vets BBS. I am talking late 1980s? 1990s...

I said there and here that the socalled AO registry exam was a farce. Alex always agreed with me.........

Vets who had been in the AO settlement fund ( my husband was and then I was as his widow, had rove of exposure from the Judge ...regardless of the disability tey had, yet had to be considered 100% disabled by it.

The AO settlement fund did not even consider any VA AO registry exam as evidence . Because it was a crock.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called up and was scheduled for mine on Sept. 23, 1993 since I had PCT. When I arrived, I got the deer in the headlights look from the nurse in charge. They swore up and down that there was no way I had an appt. that day. They did the labs and promised me a sit down face to face with a real MD "soon". Still waiting lo these 20 years for the callback. In the meantime I filed and got my 40%.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use