Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Plans Massive Death Study

Rate this question


Berta

Question

This study will sure be enlightening. I wonder who is paying for it.

Courtesy Colonel Dan the www.nextgov.com link he gave doesnt work or me.....maybe he has better access to the Nextgov site...

"February 1,
2013


The Veterans A ffairs Department has kicked off
a massive study in cooperation with the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Defense Department to determine the cause of veterans’ deaths
since 1979, an effort that requires matching records of 34 million service
personnel with death certificates.


Aaron Schneiderman, acting director of VA’s
epidemiology program, said the National Mortality Study will first focus on
roughly 1 million veterans who served on active duty during the Afghanistan and
Iraq wars from 2001 through 2010, which among other things will help the VA
determine the scope of veteran suicides on a national basis. These matches only
will include personal information such as name, date of birth and Social
Security number; they will not include Defense health records.


A veteran commits suicide every 80 minutes,
according to recent estimates from the VA . Suicides by active duty military
personnel in 2012 hit 349, more than the 295 Americans who died in combat in
Afghanistan.


CDC’s Division of Vital Statistics at the
National Center for Health Statistics will match records provided by Defense
with death certificate information from all 50 states contained in the National Death
Index
, said NDI director Lillian Ingster. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/ndi/about_ndi.htm


The NDI is a computerized index of death record
information on file in state vital statistics offices and is used by
epidemiologists and other health and medical investigators to help determine
causes of death. Ingster said the 34 million records include everyone who has
served in the military since 1979 -- w hen the NDI went into operation. The
study will involve the largest matching exercise in which she has ever
engaged.


“This is enormous,” Ingster said. Her division
has been grinding through the data since the end of 2012, with completion of the
34 million matches expected in a matter of months. She said the veteran matching
process encountered a few hiccups as the NDI was switched from a mainframe to a
server-based environment.


Schneiderman said death certificates include
standardized sources of information on causes of deaths, including drug
overdoses and chronic diseases. Once the matches are completed, the results will
help VA determine “how to care for veterans.”


Schneiderman said once VA receives the data
match file from CDC its first task will be to conduct a mortality study of
Afghanistan a nd Iraq veterans that will include an evaluation of traumatic
injury deaths (suicides and car crashes) and poisonings (drug overdose).


He added that the study also will help VA
determine if there are factors that result in a higher number of veteran deaths
than in the general population. VA can then use information to “drive down”
particular causes of death, he said.


Ingster agreed, and said the medical research
community and VA can use the study to improve care.


Dr. Remington Nevin, a former Army
epidemiologist who left the service this fall to pursue a degree in public
health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, said
Defense and VA have made a good start in developing a national veteran mortality
database, but cautioned that death certificates prepared by local coroners ̶
0;can be pretty sloppy and there is no quality control.”


Nevin said VA could get better insight into
veteran suicides if it also tapped into the CDC’s National Violent Death
Reporting System
, which covers only 18 states. Ingster said CDC is not using
this system for the VA national mortality study.


If all 50 states signed on to the National
Violent Death Reporting System it would be a valuable resource to help VA
pinpoint veteran suicides, Nevin said."




By Bob
Brewin


February 1,
2013

(This will be an eye opener for sure)

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

And some of those RVN vets are within this timeframe :

"the cause of veterans’ deaths

since 1979, an effort that requires matching records of 34 million service

personnel with death certificates."

That involves most of us survivors here as far as their vet spouses deaths.........occuring after 1979. Wonder why they picked that specific date?????

The war was over in 1975. Maybe they found out Doctor Eliot was Right.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

2/3 of Vietnam vets are dead, so this to me is a high rate 40 some odd years after the end of the war.

I wonder how this compares with cohort of males age 60-68 who did not serve during Vietnam? We know that socioeconomic factors were at play because if you have money to go to college you could get out of serving during the worst years of the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly , I think it is a massive waste of money that could be put to benefit the living veterans and their families. Just think how many more raters could be hired to clear up the backlog with these funds... I guess there are not enough government jobs for this administration now they have to create more....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Another study that the VA already knows the answer too.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, I think you know the answer to your own question. I believe that we as taxpayers will be footing the bill. I agree with Teac, this is a complete waste of money. Money that could be used in a more proficient manner in deleting this claim backlog that is hovering around and going no where....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use