Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Yay! Awarded 70% But Wait....

Rate this topic


chrome_305

Recommended Posts

A diagnosis is only one step.

Until a condition is rated as SC by the VA - it is not really SC'd.

In 2006 the C&P examiner may have opined a diagnosis but were these

two adjudicated as SC'd ?

I forgot all about the C&P report from 2006 until recently. I ask for all my C&P exams from VA clinic (which i have done plenty of times blink.png ). I went to my Va rep filled a claim send VA proof of the C&P from 2006 and also follow up lab results which they can produce themselves since I have been a blood bank to the VA since 2006.

Then Va added the condition to my appeal as "new". i just recently did this while the appeal was gathering evidence phase.

I never heard anything from the VA about a rating for the now "new" conditions after the C&P exam from 2006.

My secondary diagnosis of Thromboyctopia is connected to Neutropenia. The VA can even Google it if they want. Shouldn't that at least be rated 10% by VA law?

================

Also the Va has the "new" condition on E-bennies misspelleddry.png

Edited by chrome_305
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

My Current SC%
Last Rating Decision was in 2010
Currently awarded Va Non-service pension since Nov 2011
Rating(s)
1. Dysthymic disorder ( Not Service-Connected)
2. Chest wall syndrome, claimed as chest pain, tightness and difficulty breathing (0%)
3. Hearing loss, left ear (Not Service-Connected)
4. Tinnitus, claimed as ringing in the ears ( Not Service-Connected)
5. Residuals of fracture of the left ring finger with pinning, to include post traumatic arthritis with ankylosis of the distal interphalangeal joint (dominant) (0%)
6. rash on chest ( Not Service-Connected)
7. sycosis barbae, claimed as razor bumps of the face (0%)
8. PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) (Not Service-Connected)

======================================================================

*My claims
Date Opened: 6/24/11
Type of claim: Appeal
Est Completion Date:Done
1. PTSD (Reopen)
2. Tinnitus (Reopen)
3. Rash on Chest (Reopen)
4. Hearing Loss, Left Ear (Reopen)
5. Hearing Loss, Right Ear (New)
6. neutropenial leukopenia (New)
7. bilateral pes planus (New)
8. mitral valve (New)
9. thrombocytopenia 2nd to leukippenia (Secondary)
==========================================================================
That you everyone this site is awesome and very helpful. I check ebbenies today and my AB8 showed me rated at 70%, but it also show the pay rate as single. I also check the benefits explorer and it showed 70% on both and P&T. I currently still have a dependency claim thats open but pending decision approval.

The thing I was wondering is what to do next? I have been getting the VA pension since 2011 which would mean I am P&T so shouldn't I be rated at 100% and P&T and not 70%?

I don't have SSI or SSDI. It's been a long battle with the VA. I don't know what was rated what yet. I will keep you guys updated.

Congratulations, 'Crome_305'... and good luck on the remands. You mentioned, you recently checked e-benefits, and it came up with 70% P&T (Permanent and Total)

Is there an unemployability issue the VA has considered? Do you have a service rep?

Best wishes,

C.B.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My secondary diagnosis of Thromboyctopia is connected to Neutropenia. The VA can even Google it if they want. Shouldn't that at least be rated 10% by VA law?

================

Also the Va has the "new" condition on E-bennies misspelleddry.png

Just having a diagnosis - does not make a condition SC'd.

What medical evidence is of record / or do you have

that shows a connection of the two blood disorders above,

to either active duty - or medically related (secondary to) to an already SC'd disability ?

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just having a diagnosis - does not make a condition SC'd.

What medical evidence is of record / or do you have

that shows a connection of the two blood disorders above,

to either active duty - or medically related (secondary to) to an already SC'd disability ?

This is what I have. A C&P report which has neuropenia axis from May 2006. Report also has lab results in the C&P showing the blood levels and says the condition is due to military service. I was discharged Sept 2005. There is also VA lab reports (lots), metal health diagnosis reports, VA doc report that says "Neutropenia now with mild Thrombocytopenia" that I sent them during my appeal.

======================

I understand what your saying Berta. I filled for the "new" disibilities and secondary all at one time. VA added those items to the recent appeal. Shouldn't the VA have added those this long ago for me even if it was non service connected.

Edited by chrome_305
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations, 'Crome_305'... and good luck on the remands. You mentioned, you recently checked e-benefits, and it came up with 70% P&T (Permanent and Total)

Is there an unemployability issue the VA has considered? Do you have a service rep?

Best wishes,

C.B.

What is remands?

My latest DBQ for PTSD says issue with work and that I haven't had a gainful work since 2010. I have plenty of mental health records showing issue with work.

I do have a Rep but not a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

======================================================================

*My claims
Date Opened: 6/24/11
Type of claim: Appeal
Est Completion Date:Done
1. PTSD (Reopen)
2. Tinnitus (Reopen)
3. Rash on Chest (Reopen)
4. Hearing Loss, Left Ear (Reopen)
5. Hearing Loss, Right Ear (New)

Sorry I thought you had already been to the BVA and the disabilities you have listed as reopened were reopened (remanded) by the BVA.. I must say it's difficult to follow your claim.

Best Wishes

C.B.

6. neutropenial leukopenia (New)
7. bilateral pes planus (New)
8. mitral valve (New)
9. thrombocytopenia 2nd to leukippenia (Secondary)
==========================================================================
JMHO,.. Yes, if P&T is included in your tdiu.
Back in the day (Vietnam era) , It use to take a couple of decades of tdiu before you could get P&T. They use to hassle the TDIU vets around their 18th year, just when the vet's child was about to graduate from High school. It could really throw a monkey wrench into the collage plans.. Check with your Rep.
Again, jmho, Things are changing at a faster pace over at the VA. Every day, it seems like there is a new rule or program. Check it out.
Good luck on your homework.

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use