Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Ao Blue Waters Sue Secretary Shinseki

Rate this question


Berta

Question

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/august032013/blue-water-suit-jpr.php

The Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association, (BWNVVA) (our president John Rossie has done many SVR shows here as well as Commander Wells too, I think , who is the attorney quoted below) and Military-Veterans Advocacy (MVA) , have sued Eric Shinseki.

Blue Water Navy Veterans Sue Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki for Failure to Grant Disability Benefits

In part:

“Attorney John Wells, who brought the suit, is a retired Navy Commander and served as Chief Engineer on three Navy ships. “I am very familiar with the naval operations at the time and the distillation equipment that enriched the dioxin.” Wells said. “We have taken this evidence to two separate committees of the Institute of Medicine, and they agree that the distillation process, based on Henry’s law of thermodynamics, would have co-distilled and enriched the dioxin. This confirmed an earlier study by the University of Queensland.” Wells is the Executive Director of MVA and previously serves as Director of Legal and Legislative Affairs for the BWNVVA. After retiring as a surface warfare officer he opened a law practice in Slidell Louisiana with emphasis on military and veterans law. “

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I agree with you Berta but I also agree with Carlie! Remember it took over 40 years for agent orange to prevail!

Now if I do the math I would doubt very much that any of us would be alive. Also looking at how they say the served on board ships or in country. I wear my Vietnam veteran hat proudly now because we will all be gone soon.

Stillhere (I think)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I personally don't see this going anywhere or IF ever very far down the road when there a few left to benefit. The supposed numbers just do not show that Navy personal have an out of whack to the general public in cases of DBll, and heart disease or cancer. He is going to have to use that they do and that is going to be very hard when the numbers are not there.

We all know that the Army and Marine boots on ground had supporting evidence by the numbers to show that DBll and a lot of the presumptive were more prevalent in the boots on ground veterans that served in Vietnam than the Vietnam era vets that did not serve in country.

Brings in mind that old saying numbers don't lie.

Stillhere

And, the VA would likely deny anyway, saying that the statistical evidence is not enough, much as they did with many A/O related cases for decades. Remember that it was congress that started the process to get the VA going on A/O. It's gonna take congress again to make much further progress. The current economic situation is less than favorable. It's also worthy of mentioning that Mideast veterans have and are having similar VA problems, just with slightly different pollutants and environmental conditions. We will be lucky to get some of the newer benefits granted to them to apply to older/all veterans.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still believe blue water veterans need to stick together and file their claims. Whether Blue water vets get recognized as Veterans who were exposed to AO or not, the numbers of claims speak for themselves. To me, not filing a claim for AO conditions if you have them , is like the person who complains about the elected official but they did not Vote. No vote = no voice. If you file your claim you are speaking to those who will ultimately make the decision.- JMO

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It might be wise for all vets who were in RVN to file now for all conditions that have a shred of evidence of connection to AO. You get denied today but if you are still alive in ten years who knows? This would be for benefit of survivors mostly. There may be more Nehmers down the road. Of course, the road is getting shorter, but there are RVN vets who are 60 years old and could live another 30 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still believe blue water veterans need to stick together and file their claims. Whether Blue water vets get recognized as Veterans who were exposed to AO or not, the numbers of claims speak for themselves. To me, not filing a claim for AO conditions if you have them , is like the person who complains about the elected official but they did not Vote. No vote = no voice. If you file your claim you are speaking to those who will ultimately make the decision.- JMO

Harleyman, Are not these claims adding to the back up and causing Veterans of today with legit claims suffering even longer to get their deserved benefits.

If BW vets want to go on record as having made a claim then fine but to actually have the VA working them is a waste of time!

These claims of throw it on the wall and see if it sticks hurts all of us! Almost like being an investor in stock market future!

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use