Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Udorn Thailand Presumptive Approved .........yes

Rate this question


jcolwell

Question

This was the first group I wanted to share great new with. Several of you know of the struggle of the Thailand veteran to get recognized for herbicide exposure by VA.

Today my husband got 20 % approval for something, we are pretty sure it is DM2. He will get retro for one year. Claim filed 10/2012.This claim was being pushed to complete by Oct 1.

He got this because he was a perimeter guard in Udorn in 1970 for USAF. He job was jet engine mechanic but they pulled him for 30days to be a tower guard. He had nothing in his file to support this claim. However the VSPA had him listed on their website as a augmentee and we also lucked out and located a former colonel who signed his evaluation in 1970 and he provided written letter that he frequently sent guys to the perimeter to help out in 1970.

Here is the Icing: He is still in a 2 year appeal post DRO interview for IHD, GERD and Renal disease. They originally denied his IHD but with DM2 approved as presumptive we expect the others will follow suit.

You guys have allways been supportive in your comments and it made this easier. Will keep you posted.

Jc :ohmy::biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It looks like they do have to at least develop the evidence.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp13/Files1/1300594.txt

"The provisions of the VA Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1MR provide the specific steps necessary in verifying herbicide exposure on a factual basis in locations other than the Republic of Vietnam. Specifically, Part IV, subpart ii.2.C.10.o. states that if a veteran alleges exposure in other locations, the RO must ask the veteran for the approximate dates, location, and nature of the alleged exposure. See VA Manual M21-1MR, Part IV, subpart ii, 2.C.10.o. If such information is received, the RO must furnish the Veteran's detailed description of exposure to Compensation Service via e-mail at VAVBAWAS/CO/211/AGENTORANGE, and request a review of the DoD's inventory of herbicide operations to determine whether herbicides were used as alleged. Id. If the Compensation Service's review does not confirm that herbicides were used as alleged, the RO must refer the case to the U.S. Army and Joint Services Records Research Center ("JSRRC") coordinator to make a formal finding that sufficient information required to verify herbicides exposure does not exist. Id."

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harleyman....I discussed this with Kurt Priessman (the very first AO Thailand veteran) and we determined some time ago that Thailand vets do not fall under the Nehmer criteria as to favorable EEDs,because Nehmer focused on Vietnam in country service.

Of course a stop over in the Nam, even just a refueling pit stop and/ or visit to a head on a base in Vietnam, is ":boots on the ground" that some Thailand vets forgot they had done, and then checking their records ,they found they in fact had "visitation" in country....even if just for a short period of time.

Our discussions however were quite some time ago. Let me double check Nehmer 2010 for that...and also I can double check with Nehmer NVLSP Lawyer Rick Spataro.....better yet maybe I should call Kurt.......as soon as I get some time later....

You made a Great point. I try to update the Korea AO regs here as well as Thailand and I think our info is current but VA will post any changes at their web site and also they (VA) have been good about posting the Ships list updates.

Those updates have primarily come from info from Blue Waters themselves, explaining to VA in claims , where their ships were in the Pacific during the war.

Brown Waters ,unlike Blue Waters, shoudn't have problems with any AO claim but I had a doozy of one with a vet here about 8 years ago.....

It was a proposed reduction.....for a 100% SC P & T AO disability and his college age kids were eligible for Chap 35, with one ready for their first semester and the VA suddenly sent him the proposal to reduce due to no boots on ground.!!!!!! stress up the ying yangs.

We put our heads together and the VA revoked the proposal!!

As we talked about his service,(and we went off on many tangents talking about Vietnam) trying to see how he could present a good argument at the hearing, he casually mentioned that one time he had helped a Vietnamese officer into the boat or sampan in a brown water tributary, to take him to the main ship.

I said Say What???? How did you help him get into the boat, ,,,,,,didn't you need to put your foot (boot) on the bank?

He then paused and said" Holy S---T Berta!"

One boot on ground is just as good as two feet on Vietnamese soil!

He proved the above regarding the officer , I think maybe with a buddy statement and collected even more evidence as fast as he could and sent it to the VA.

VA dropped the hearing very quickly and reversed their proposed reduction.(and I sure thanked God a lot! He did too)

Like you said sometimes it only takes one piece of evidence to turn the tide and sometimes, I have found, that a veteran's memories need to be jolted, particularly for stressor places and dates or other events that they might have overlooked, when they first filed their claims.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I wonder if the USA ever used AO in Cambodia and Laos since we had secret wars going on their for years during Vietnam War? They will never admit it unless someone has absolute proof. The average age of RVN vet is probably 65-68 nowdays.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You stated you have a two year old appeal. When was your husband diagnosed with IHD and when was your original claim filed for these AO related conditions? You could be eligible for an earlier effective date on those issues depending on when he was diagnosed as these conditions would fall under the NEHMER quidelines.

If Berta would chime in on this, as she is the NEHMER expert along with many other issues. :)

I would like to add, KOREA WAR veterans exposure to AO LIST is also ever expanding, based on perimeter guard duty, or military police MOS. Any orders or military records either medical and/or personnel, showing service in either in Thailand and Korea, and a Veterans MOS should be looked at very closely. The VA frequently adds more and more units to the list of exposure to herbicides in these two countries. This list is ever changing, the same as the ships list they add to the RVN list for AO exposure, for the blue water Veterans.

A Veteran's statement of perimeter duty, combined with a buddy statement or supporting MOS, CIB badge,Infantry MOS, etc. and/or confirmation by commandng NCO or COs is enough to get SC for AO conditions, even if the records don't specifically say you stood guard on the perimeter. The benefit of the doubt goes to the Veteran. One piece of supporting evidence may be enough to show exposure.- Harleyman

IHD first diagnosed in 1999. Claim filed 4/2011 when we became aware of new VA regs on AO and Thailand. No claims ever filed at VA till 2011. We just did not know. JC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JOHN999- There were alot of Veteran's sent to Cambodia and Laos as "advisors", prior to our big involvment in the country of Vietnam. Those Veteran's called "advisors" would be in their mid 70's some of them. The advisor NCO's that I knew about and some I have met peronally where, NCO's ranked as E-5,6,7s , which made them a bit older than the 1960s guys going into RVN who were 6-7 years their junior in age.

BERTA- Veterans many times overlook important information in their records. Even a letter that thier parents may have saved while they were in the military, my be considered important evidence insupport of a claim. It would be wise for the Veteran to attend an outreach and see if they can hook up with someone who is used to reviewing records to see if they have missed a condition for a potential claim.

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Harleyman

Yes, I have met some older vets who were in Vietnam in 1961-62. I think these advisors were whatever special forces were called at the time. I am thinking of average age of RVN vets. I was 19 years old when I got there in 1970 so I am at the younger part of the curve. Largest number of vets were there in 67-69, so figure they are probably 65-66. USA began to withdraw after TET 1968. I could google that and probably get an answer. Vast majority of RVN vets were young men, but I know there were career soldiers there for multiple tours. I am sure there will be plenty of RVN vets who live into their 90's or even older. WW11 vet obits are usually for guys 88-90 something these days. 20 years old in 1945 would make a vet about 88. I check obits for Nam vets and most are in mid to late 60's. Yes, I need a life.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use