Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Induced Anxiety Disorder

Rate this question


jbasser

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I often wonder if the perils of dealing with the claims process and the VA has ever been given a name. I think it should be called VA Induced Anxiety Disorder. or VAIAD.

I bet there is some validity to this term. What does the membership think?

Jbasser.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I would say if anyone ever feels like giving up -- they should go review Betty's claim. If anyone ever deserved an award for tenacity - it is Betty. She would NOT NOT NOT give up. She just kept on fighting when ALL odds were totally against her. She had to deal with the military destroying her records, the VA changing her diagnoses (When the C&P examiner correctly diagnosed her with anxiety disorder, they sent her to other doctors that would diagnose her with a personality disorder without so much as doing a psychological test), etc.etc. etc. When I first joined Hadit, Betty was in EVERY thread trying to get help in figuring out her claim. I think most of us thought she didn't have a chance. But she would NOT give up - She just kept fighting anyway. I think some of us finally started trying to help her, not because we thought she would win, but because she would not shut up, she would not be ignored, and she would not stop fighting for her right to veteran benefits. I kept thinking "OMG! Who IS this woman???" But once we really started listening to her story, we realized "Wow! Maybe she DOES have a claim." But she was still up against some horrifying odds in winning it. But she just kept fighting. She got a hold of an old military doctor who happened to keep a copy of her medical records (because he knew they were going to try to railroad her). She got an IMO that showed in no uncertain terms the VA examiners had misdiagnosed her with a personality disorder. In ALL her years of treatment the ONLY diagnose of PD was from those two doctors who didn't even do ONE test. So with her IMO and her newly discovered SMRs in hand - she was awarded retroactive benefits WAY back to when she first applied.

Her strength and tenacity were amazing! And she will always be one of my favorite people here at Hadit. Betty not only fought hard for her claim - she was always so supportive of everyone else fighting for theirs. After a long absence from Hadit -- the FIRST thing I did when I logged back in was looked for Betty. She is that special.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks Free,

I shall admit and plead guilty to all you said. I would not shut up. I was the biggest nuisance on Hadit.

You must admit, I did get attention.

It was called help me or kick me off the site.

Help did pour in from all directions and I still see myself headed to Washington, D.C to the Forsenic Psychiatrist for my final trial.

The trial of my life.

I remember at the top of the mountain, saying a prayer for each and everyone of you.

As I have said the names went on and on.

The long battle was finally over for me.

I know that I first filed in 1978, but cannot locate the records and left it at 1992.

I will answer John's question.

I allowed them to cheat me out of about $300,000.

Can I prove it. You better beleive I can, but I won't.

They gave me half and they took half.

Thanks to all.

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I shall admit and plead guilty to all you said. I would not shut up. I was the biggest nuisance on Hadit."

Okay! We will give you the most tenacious and biggest nuisance award! ;)

(((Big Hug)))

Oh.. I remember the trip you took to Washington and how scary that was for you. I think you were stressing about having to cross a bridge. But all your fighting made you brave enough to cross that bridge if you had to.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use