Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Please Help-Time Is Running Out

Rate this question


warren

Question

My RO denied my NOD that they received 01/10/2012..I disagreed with their 10% award for IHD, stating that i should have received 30%, this is nehmer claim back to sept 11, 2002, I did receive retroactive pay on the 10%. I received their denial letter on the 30%, Nov 15, 2013, telling me i had 60 days from the date of their letter to appeal their decision. They sent me a VA form 9 to appeal to the BVA. They said i could have a hearing before they sent my case to the BVA. They told me not to delay filing my appeal if i request a hearing, because my request for a hearing does not extend the 60 days. If i request a hearing before RO and they agree with me, does my appeal still have to go to the BVA? The reason i'm asking, is that i don't want my appeal to go to BVA and sit their for 2 years, if the new info will change the ro's mind and they award me 30%. I had original C&P on Nov. 3, 2010 and NOD C&P on jan 28,2013. Today Dec. 3, 2013, i had exam with one of the best civilian cardiologists in my area. He spent quite a bit of time with me. gave me Electrocardiogram and other test. Got a big surprise, I have had a heart attack in the past (didn't know i had one), I have problems with electrical activity in my heart, heart beat is low, i have to wear heart monitor, and was giving nitro. Tomorrow i go in for stress test and i will walk the tread mill (VA wouldn't let me walk tread mill). In the year 2001, i had a heart cath showing two blockages of 55% and two of 40%. He says that most likely, from his 40 years of experience, I will have blockages needing open heart surgery or stents. I don't know why the VA didn't find this. Please, i need some advice on what to do since my 60 days will be up 1/15/2014. Is what the cardiologists has already found and if the stress test shows i need by-pass or stent is this considered IHD?

GOD BLESS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files1/0506011.txt

In this case they used diagnostic code 7005 for IHD in a 2002 BVA decision.

Can you tell us what diagnostic code VA used for your Nehmer claim?

The Nehmer RO people were well trained by NVLSP using the training letter or these claims that is posted at hadit.

The ROs made minimal mistakes, as a Nehmer lawyer told me, but that doesn't mean they were always correct, as my claim showed.

It was the worse error (of many my AOJ RO has made over the years) and I was shocked by it because it came from a different VARO.

But as I said above I got that fixed in a heartbeat...I was very angry. .VA had ruined enough of my Christmases and I made sure that Chrtistmas (2011) would be a good one.

NVLSP couldn't help with the error (it was a CUE within the recent decision ) but they reviewed the final award for me.to make sure my retro was correct.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical case of the VA playing GOD with a veterans disability. In the case of heart disease a mistake (hmm) by them could lead to an early departure from the land of grass under your feet.

I am 100% for my heart and if it was up to the VA I feel I would have been dead in 05! I put my money out for a private cardio dr. knowing he will do his very best to try and extent my life!

You are doing the right thing and as Jay says get cracking with a lawyer and follow through with everything your cardio doc says.

Hell i feel the stress just dealing with the VA and my heart makes everyday of my life shorter! Let the lawyer handle all the stress and set your sights on enjoying what you have left on this earth!

Goodluck!

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Your rating will be based on the strength of the heart either by Mets or Ejection Fraction.

That is how they do it.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

You asked if i contacted NVLSP when I filed this. claim.

on 9-11-2002, I filed for agent orange exposure and hearing loss on VA form 21-526, thru DAV. I didn't contact NVLSP at any time. They surprised me with a letter when i received the 10% for taking the blood pressure medicine Metoprolol. NVLSP, wanted to know if i had received the correct date concerning the retroactive pay and I did and the retro dollars were correct. Metoprolol was prescribed by civilian cardiologist and my pcp at va clinic started giving it to me in sep. 2002.

You stated that malpractice could be a potential result.

VA made my 10% award based on the following evidence:

a. All evidence contained in the claims file prior to sep 19, 2002, which is the earliest date a claim for nehmer purposes was received in va.

b. original disability claim, VA form 21-526, received on 9/11/2002.

c. VAMC treatment records received on 9/19/2002.

d. VA rating decisions dated 3/17/2003 and 10/28/2010, and all evidence contained therein..

e. Your claim, VA form 21-526 (VONAPP), received 6/18/2010.

f. duty to assist letter sent on 7/12/2010.

g. VAMC C&P exam dated 11/3/2010.

h. cardiologists treatment records dated 5/26/2005 to 7/13/2010, received on nov 19,2010.

i. hospital treatment records dated 12/5/2001, received on 11/19/2010. this the one that shows the blockages. i guess i was late getting it to them.

j. an electronic review of VAMC treatment records dated 8/9/2002 to 2/4/2010

yes i have copies of the actual C&P results of 11/3/10 and 1/28/13.

under reasons for decision: pursuant to the authority granted by the agent orange act of 1991, etc.

this statement too: va conducted a de novo review of your entire claims file to determine the earliest date of claim per 38 code of federal regulations 3.816 pertaining to awards under the nehmer court order.

Berta, i'm sorry i'm getting very tired, i will continue later.

GOD BLESS YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Warren, lets help folks understand. It is obvious that the VA has you rated between 7 and 10 mets. That is basically an EF of 70 to 100.

You have blockages, Those may require angioplasty unless one is in an area that cant be reached by the catheter. Then they would have to open you up. Now for the percentages of blockages, They may wait on a 55 percent blockage.But then again they may do it. Now for Surgery the VA has to 100 percent the rating for a convalescence period then re examine you later to get your stabilized rating.

Get your latest Echo or Heart Cath and look at the LVEF. That alone will tell you where you stand.

Hang in there.

Basser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basser,

Thank you, I realize i panicked but i don't like the VAMC playing games with my life. I'll find out tomorrow when I walk the tread mill for a civilian cardiologists what my mets and lvef are. Maybe the VAMC is correct. I can't see how they missed the heart attack, electric problem and low heart beat.

GOD BLESS YOU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use