Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can U Believe This. ?

Rate this question


63SIERRA

Question

Saw this on another site. basically extorting a vet out of filing a claim, with a VSO involved.

My IU claim disappeared in the afternoon after a morning call from my VSO (who I can never contact or hear from). I'm 70% (60,10,10) and VSO said the RO was going to reduce my 60 to 0% if I didn't withdraw my IU claim. I just got awarded CRDP last year and filed for IU a month later since I met the criteria. Since I'm retired military I would not receive CRDP if reduced to 20%.
I asked what do I need to do? VSO said they'd draft a letter and take it to RO and that RO said they wouldn't reduce if I withdrew the IU claim. That afternoon I had no open claims even though I had a couple more than the IU claim. Guess that's one way to reduce the backlog...
I'll let you know what comes in the mail when I get it, Cheffy! Good luck with yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

What reasons did the RO give for the proposed decrease? Filing for IU, while possibly triggering C&Ps for different things doesn't have anything to do with them proposing a reduction, unless a C&P showed some kind of alleged improvement in a condition.

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

well the fact is, they arent supposed to try to intimidate people into dropping claims by threatening to lower existing claims. If a claim is valid, its valid Period. Evidently if they said they would leave the existing claims alone if he dropped TDUI they were valid. This isnt LETS MAKE A DEAL. It is supposed to be a system of laws and regulations.

It looks to me like they used the service rep to do thier dirty work., They didnt deal with him directly. No wonder they like service orgs.

Edited by 63SIERRA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What if the VSO had talked to the rater and they saw that his conditioned had improved while reviewing private medical submitted by veteran? They then told the VSO and notified the vet. I've seen many of these while working here

One a guy was two weeks away from ten year mark for 100%. Came in filed ed secondary to 100% condition. Rvsr saw that in Vamc notes veterans 100% had improved. Rvsr brought this to poa and said maybe to withdraw Ed for now. Vet opted to proceed and was reduced. Had the rvsr overlooked the 100% quality would have hit him for it.

Another the veteran was pyramided. I took to rvsr for a separate question and she saw that and said that his 100% would be lower after

Pyramiding was taken out. I took it to poa and let them know. Vet again wanted to proceed. He was reduced. Always two sides. Jmho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If a vet has been 100% for over five years the VA must show by more than one exam that he has improved. The VA has to show a definite improvement over time to reduce a 100% vet and get away with it. They can reduce anyone but they can't get away with it. I do agree that if you are 100% and you want an extra 10% that might be a little crazy. However, every 10% leads somewhere like Housebound maybe. If my DMII gets worse I am going to file for an increase even though I have been TDIU for 12 years. Anything to do with agent orange and I am going to file. The army poisoned me and I want them to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Maybe I didn't say it right (I' apologize). My point was that believe it or not some of us vacemployees who are veterans do look out for our fellow brothers and sisters. We can only go so far, like a phone call, to try and help but we do try. I was just showing to Sierra there can be two sides. By all means file john999 and get you just deserved. I pray you do. Good luck to ya.

This is all just my humble meager opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use