Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Married Ex-Spouse


john999

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Can a married ex-spouse have any claim to DIC, or any other death benefit of a vet who dies from SC condition? My wife's ex-husband finally did something good and died. I am pretty sure the bastard died from an AO condition. Some private investigator called my wife to try and track down her ex's children. I was taking a nap or I would have told her to ask that he send her a letter making all these requests. She was in shock to an extent so she gave out a lot of information to a stranger over the phone.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0


John, I think that is very concerning ......did the PI's phone number pop up on the caller ID? That might be a way to find out if they were legit by googling the phone number..

There is something to consider....perhaps the ex spouse had a AO claim pending when he died.

In that case VA is supposed to seek the beneficiarys for any retro involved.

Depending on many factors , (the age of any children he had, and whether there he had another spouse by now)

, the VA could possibly seek your wife as his ex spouse. to see if there were children of that marriage who should get the retro.

In part:
"(f) Payment of Benefits to Survivors or Estates of Deceased Beneficiaries—
(1) General. If a Nehmer class member entitled to retroactive benefits pursuant to paragraphs ©(1) through ©(3) or (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section dies prior to receiving payment of any such benefits, VA shall pay such unpaid retroactive benefits to the first individual or entity listed below that is in existence at the time of payment:
(i) The class member's spouse, regardless of current marital status.

Note to paragraph (f)(1)(i):
For purposes of this paragraph, a spouse is the person who was legally married to the class member at the time of the class member's death.
(ii) The class member's child(ren), regardless of age or marital status (if more than one child exists, payment will be made in equal shares, accompanied by an explanation of the division).



http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.816

There is a lot more to Nehmer on this matter but it appears to me from above, that if there is retro under Nehmer due the vet and he died before he got the retro, the
children of that past marriage (with your wife) could be eligible for the Nehmer award. .

But the VA sure doesnt hire PIs to find beneficiarys, as far as I know, and would only know of many of them when they did the socalled Nehmer review of all past decision prior to the 2010 regs of Vietnam vets, to see if an AO presumptive was listed as NSC.( Of course they didnt find all potential AO claims ,and survivors still show up from time to time at vet sites asking Nehmer questions.

But the PI knew the veteran had died....or did he really die? When did he die? VA doesnt move fast even if this was a Nehmer matter.

If your wife knows the county and state where he died and the exact date , perhaps she could get a copy of the death certificate because she would still know his SSA number.(and I bet the PI knows it too.)

I never post my birthday on the internet, nor the actual date of my husband's death and some other things....because I learned these are ways scammers can get into ones personal identity stuff.

Vets used to be urged to register their DD 214 with the county court house,in the county they live in, as a good way to always know where the DD 214 is.

That alone set up vets for identity problems many years ago.

Then again, anyone can present themselves with info that the PI had, to get even more info for a nefarious purpose.

I wonder if this vet really has died.




GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

I was also suspicious when I heard that PI's were trying to track down survivors of my wife's deadbeat EX. This guy never had a dime to his name. They have two daughters together. The so-called PI said there were remains of some fund that needed to be distributed to survivors. My wife took no notes nor did she get the PI to send her a letter before she spoke to them. I told her they could have been bill collectors not PI's looking for survivors. She got no phone number or even the name of the PI outfit. The "PI" mentioned SSA money that was left in an account, but I never heard of the SSA hiring PI's to track down survivors. Her Ex had no will nor estate as far as I know except maybe bad debts.

So you think my wife and/or her kids might have a claim under Nehmer? I know so few facts and my wife does not understand or care. Her Ex was SC for a AO condition and I bet he died from either lung cancer or heart disease.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I think the kids would have a potential Nehmer claim. I am not sure about your wife.....

"The "PI" mentioned SSA money that was left in an account, but I never heard of the SSA hiring PI's to track down survivors"

Me either.

SSA would know if that is the fact.

This smells like a scam to me.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use