Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Awarded For Depressive Disorder, But Diagnosed With Ptsd

Rate this question


sevensees

Question

Hello Veterans,

First and foremost, thank you all for your service. You are all heroes to me and I always find it special when I am speaking with a vet.

I am here seeking help for my father's claim. In a nutshell, he has been in a battle since 2005 with the VA and his disability. He filed for his disability with the VA in 2005 for PTSD. He was diagnosed by two different VA doctors and was determined completely disabled and unable to work by those doctors. His man VA psychologist sent a letter to the Dept. of Education in 2007 stating that he was "completely and totally disabled with a diagnoses of PTSD and unable to work". He also was awarded SSD in 2005.

He was finally awarded disability benefits by the VA in 2012 but for "Major Depressive Disorder (claimed as PTSD)", as the claims examiner stated he doesn't meet the symptomology of PTSD and awarded him instead for service connection with major depressive disorder (claimed as PTSD) at a 50% disability.

He has not worked since 2000 due to his disability. His latest visit to his doctor indication no improvement with poor prognosis. He also had a GAF rating of 45, but the VA listed it as 50 on his award letter. He filed an appeal in a timely manner.

His doctor stated yesterday that he feels he should be 100%.

My question after all of that is: Would fighting for the diagnoses of service connected PTSD help his rating in any way, or should we simply pursue a higher rating based on the currently assigned service connected disability?

Thank you very much for your time, it is much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Appeal and point out the errors. I would ask for a Hearing. Meanwhile gather evidence to show why should be 100%. Give them coppies of his SSD award and show when they considered him disabled.

Good luck don't give up.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I would just go with what you have and try to get the increase to 100%. PTSD is another type of anxiety disorder. Depression can disable people just as badly as PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you both. I am in the middle of helping him with a statement to support his NOD, and request that they reconsider the rating and add TDIU before it gets to the appeal tribunal. The reason I'm helping him with a statement to support his NOD is because on his original NOD is only said: "I wish to appeal your decision on 04/26/12 mostly based on amounts, the dates and the number of dependents."

His intention with that was to not "say the wrong thing" and have them find a way to take away his service connection. He almost didn't want to even appeal out of fear.

We still (since 04/13) hadn't received a letter from them stating that they got the NOD until I called them last week and they sent a letter out saying "thank you for your inquiry regarding a NOD. According to our records, we have received your NOD. Please be aware that the Appeals department has experienced a significant increase in its workload. There are a large number of NODs and yours will be processed asap. We will send you a letter after the NOD has been processed.

Anyway, since he didn't provide any details for the appeal people to consider, I'm helping him clarify that NOD by stating that his conditions are more severe than the 50% rating he was given, doctor has deemed him disabled, the SSA has declared him disabled. He hasn't worked in over a decade. His GAF is 45. We're requesting that they reconsider his claim and assign a 100% rating and TDIU effective on the date of his original claim.

I hope things haven't been too far messed up to at least get the TDIU that he deserves. They knew about the SSD because its listed as evidence in the award letter in 2011.

Oh.. I also have a form that his doctor filled out in 2009 and sent to the Dept. of Education declaring him permanently and totally disabled, and the doctor had to certify that he is unable to work and earn money because of a condition that is expected to continue indefinitely or result in death. Unable to earn money in any capacity in any field of work". It doesn't state anything about before 2009 though, unfortunately.

So, since TDIU wasn't stated in the original NOD (nothing was really), do you feel he has lost out on it since 2005 even though he has SSD and hasn't worked since 2001?

I'm sorry to flood you guys with all of this, but I've literally had 4 hours of sleep in the last two days trying to get this clarification letter in on time before he loses out on EVERYTHING. Thanks so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use