Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Cue On Original Claim

Rate this question


saxman

Question

Hello everybody! I'm knew to this form so please bare with me if I am posting in the wrong form.

First some of the details on my CUE claim: I filed my original claim back in 1992 for Sarcoidosis and Ulnar nerve entrapment, I was awarded 30% for my Sarcoidosis but they never mention or adjudicated the Ulnar nerve entrapment. I took the 30% and never looked back until years later I started having problems with my wrist again. So I was told to file another claim and I did and this time they granted SC with a effective date of the second claim. After I was awarded for my wrist I filed a CUE for an effective date of the original claim.

Do I have a CUE for an effective date of the original claim?

Thanks,

saxman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Zoomies helping Zoomies, sir. Remember the AF motto- Why march, paddle or wade through a swamp when you can fly there. That's why we invented airplanes. Regardless of the branch of service, we help one another get there by the shortest path. Leave no one behind...

Joe Fenderson's case taught us that once you win, you can begin a discussion of what the appropriate date of claim is-be it 1992 or 2012. You have one year to file a NOD to that effect. After that, you acquiesce to VA's decision as being correct. You can fight this for years and years but you have to take that important first step and put down your marker after you win.

When you ask for an increase in your rating, you can only go back a year before your claim to examine pertinent info that might prove you were entitled to it earlier (but not more than a year earlier). With an initial claim, once you win, the whole enchilada is opened up and a long-winded discussion (and adjudication) can ensue from it. At no other time will you be able to influence or change the effective date of entitlement other than by a CUE. Granted there is the 38 CFR 3.156© avenue, but that isn't pertinent to this discussion. You had what you needed to prevail in 1992. VA just had a brain fart and let it slip. Unfortunately, they will now try to cement it in 2012 and forbid revisiting 1992. Be very careful with suspense dates. Best of luck.

Clear prop. Clear six.

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks again! I wasted no time filing a NOD for an earlier EED of 1992 once they awarded me on the claim that i filed last year. i know you have a year to file a NOD, but way wait? I filed one month after my decision.

saxman

Edited by saxman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks again! I wasted not time filing a NOD for an earlier EED of 1992 once they awarded me on the claim that i filed last year. i know you have a year to file a NOD, but way wait? I filed one month after my decision.

saxman

You absolutely must get the VBA to see that - although they just SC'd and provided compensation for your (ulnar nerve - wrist)

on their decision dated XX/XX/XXXX - this issue has clearly been open awaiting a decision since XX/XX/1992.

It was claimed in 1992 (send them a copy of that submission) and NO DECISION WAS EVER MADE, until now.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Roger that, Carlie. I was assuming he inputted that contention into the NOD. If not, he needs to file an addendum to the NOD reiterating why he feels the ED is 1992 and why- listing each and every piece of evidence which was in constructive possession of the VA (PEB/MEB). Bell v. Derwinski was decided July 21, 1992 so the theorem of constructive possession doesn't attach before that day. I'm hoping his filing was during or after that timeframe.

a

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Asknod, Yes I did mention on the NOD that my condition was on my 1992 claim and the VA never mention anything about it. I still have a copy of my original claim just in case they lost the original from 1992. My claim was filed late 1992, and was effective Jan 1993 the first day I was a civilian.

saxman

Edited by saxman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use