Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

% Needed To Appeal

Rate this question


Cavman

Question

Concerning my appeal to the DRO that I just sent in along with the IU form they sent with decision letter. I was rated 50% SC for PTSD. I appealed for a higher percentage and filled out the IU form they sent for unemployability. Doctor states I`m unemployable. My question is I`m only 50%, does that mean I will be denied because of low percentage for filing the appeal for IU or could I be given a 70% rate along with IU at the same time?

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

When a veteran submits an application for IU, it also acts as a claim for increased evaluation. Further, when a veteran sends in an IU application and that veteran doesn't meet the schedular requirements of §4.16, the VA will first see if the veteran qualifies for an increase in evaluation that would bring their disability percentage inline with the schedular requirements. If the increase is warranted and it brings the veteran to the schedular requiements, then the VA would consider the issue of IU. If the veteran doesn't meet the schedluar criteria for IU after being evaluated for an increase, then the RVSR or DRO must decide in their judgment whether or not the veteran can obtain a substantial gainful occupation due to their service-connected disabilities. If the RVSR or DRO is convince that the veteran is unable to work because of the sevice-connected condition(s), then they would submit your IU application to the Director of Compensation in Washington, D.C. for extra schedular approval. If the RVSR or DRO isn't convince that you are unable to obatin a substantial gainful occupation due to your service-connected disabilities, then they will simply deny the IU.

One must remember the rating schedule, for the most part, has the rating percentage for any given condition that will reflect the schedular requirments for IU if that disability is severe enough to prevent a veteran from obtaining and maintaining a substantial gainful occupation. For example, the lower back, if a veteran has forward flexion of let's say 80 degress, that warrants a 10% rating. If the veteran can move that much they're probably able to work. Now let's say that veteran has been put on bed rest by his doctor for a total of 10 weeks over the past year. That is a pretty severe back disability and any employer probably wouldn't keep that employee around for any substantial length of time. Due to the incapacitating episodes, this situation would call for a 60% evaluation, thus quailifying the veteran under the schedular requirements for IU. Another good example of this is mental conditions rated at 70% or 100%. There it states

"Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work," or "Total occupational and social impairment."

Now, there are some certain disabilities that have a maximim award, according to the rating schedule, that would not qualify a veteran for IU under its schedular requirments. One condition that comes to mind is migrains, which have a maximum of I think 50%. This is where sub paragraph b of §4.16 comes in to the picture. If most veterans that are on IU would look on their rating decisoins, I'm willing to bet that their disability(ies) were raised to meet the schedular requirements first and then awarded IU on that basis. It is very, very, very rare to have a veteran rated IU without meeting the schedular requirements. For the most part, if the disability prevents the veteran from working, there is a rating percentage in the rating schedule that reflects that.

Vike 17

Edited by Vike17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest terrysturgis

Vike17, That was very well written and even with my slight case of CRS I would be able to steer other veterans to your answer to help clarify the TDIU question. Thanks again! Terry Sturgis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, the easy way to do it if the VA intends to award IU is to bump you up to 60-70% and then award it.

If that happens, whats next, file for 100% p & t? What if my doctor`s letter states I am 100% p & t in his opinion?

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cavman

If you ask for IU and get it then you get paid at the 100% rate. You can cross the other bridges when you come to them. Get 100% schedular or IU and then worry about the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use